1 AFFIDAVIT I am uneducated

 

My 14 years research and actual experience with100% evidences read carefull a to z

 

I states that I am the author and authorized manager/operator/ provider/ and/or publisher of all web-site link I do hereby on solemn affirmation states and declare as under .my all website link- here are the findings of my 14 years research and actual experience with100% evidences like. While doing all these only I am alone involved nether my neither family members nor working staffs are involved.

 

 

I want to copy of this project to reduce the world crime.

 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN 7 Rulers UAE or Ministers of world

 

Petrol price has under lien the Ministers of the World

 

Petrol/Water price is same.


Mum Media, without shedding a single drop of blood will abolish slavery, and bring peace in the world.


All the seven Rulers of Emirates please check my website www.dayalmummedia.com  7 Rulers partner per 7 Billions of dollars income UAE

 

I am uneducated, but in good faith and interest I want to contribute my project in growth of UAE.

 


By Declaring 2013, UAE a Commercial media and tax free country more multi-national companies will come to UAE and competition will increase.


I want a meeting with anyone of the rulers or Police King of emirates.

There are only seven Rulers in emirates and within one day, they can unite together. Earlier the Seven Rulers were united. Seven rulers all are Muslims. They follow Sharia law. They administered UAE for a period of 40 years. When
the King asked them to give the kingdom, nobody was happy to give. Now E-system is encouraging English to come in force. In India there are 575 Rulers, it is very difficult to unite them.

I am an Indian. I have lived with in Dubai for 34 years and respect Dubai as my home country. Now I am 64 years of old and a heart patient and have invested all my life’s savings in this project so I have now decided to contribute it to UAE for the welfare of one and all, with good heart and clean hands. I wish the government run’s my project, for this reason I request meeting with anyone of the rulers of emirates. I would like to share my ideas to only the right concern, who can take decision. I want to discuss in person how I foresee growth of economy in Dubai and other emirates.

Checks http://www.dayalmummedia.com

Downloads Link: http://www.dayalmummedia.com/downloads/petition.doc


With Dhahi Khalfan’s judiciary legal power and my uneducated Duplicate Gandhi brain there will be a 100% win-win situation.

This device is a gift to the UAE government by an Indian national. It will save the government a large amount of capital expenses and will also generate substantial income to the treasury. I am Contributing to the government of the UAE a ‘Lamp of Aladdin’ that is a money making and job creating device which in conjunction with the governments backing  can make them a very significant revenue.


The petitioner understands that Sharia law has united the UAE and its seven rulers. The Sharia law is one of the best legal systems in the world. This system has united many Arab countries since they have the same legal system.

After the Sept 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S., the UAE was identified as a major financial center used by al-Qaeda in transferring money to the hijackers (two of the 9/11 hijackers were UAE citizens).

 

The nation immediately co-operated with the U.S., freezing accounts tied to suspected terrorists and strongly clamping down on money laundering.

That the UAE has been one of the most stable economies in the world. It is clear that there was a global economic crisis the struck the world’s leading banks but over 70 banks in the UAE survived this situation with little stress while other banks were losing billions overnight.

That the increase in consumer protection policy and export and import controls will protect human rights within the UAE.

With permission of God I am in Dubai 0507570737 and am sending this God’s message to all the Seven Rulers of Emirates.

In the name of God, the beneficent, the most merciful Grow Dubai

My appeal:

 

Over 2000 years, British ruled the world. Indian freedom fighter Mahatma Gandhi, by leading nationwide campaigns for easing the poverty, expanding women’s rights, built religious and ethnic peace, increased economic self reliance, and above all made India free from British Raj (rule) by non-violence. Gandhi strove to practice non-violence and truth in all circumstances.

 

Similarly my Gandhi brain and with permission of Allah, designed FAME Device and in my dream Allah ordered me to contribute this device to the Seven Rulers of Emirates for welfare of the Arab world.  FAME device is a device that will bring Dubai millions of dollars from tourists and residents and add to the glory of Dubai.

 

In exchange I plead the concerning Dubai Authorities to give all justice. I am innocent and an investor. I have suffered a lot, since 1998. With this constructive project I wanted to bring peace and harmony, all over Emirates. I have lived in Dubai for almost 34 years it is like my home. I have no criminal record in my life. I invested my entire life-savings in this project only to bring comfort and ease in the day to day life of a man to earn his bread. Educated professionals come to Dubai in search of employment. This project will feed millions of job-hunters on employment visas; on contract basis as well as part-time and for those who cannot work for various reasons can also work from the comfort of their home.

 

Enjoy Job Security, Earn salaries compatible with your qualification and experience. Live a Life Free of Job Pressure and Uncertainties.

 

The plight of NRIs- whether businessmen or employees- has touched my heart.   I came to a conclusion that the greatest service to Indians or Asian passport holder in general and NRI community in particular would be to provide them with cheap and quick legal help. Indians or Asian passport holder suffer torture, pains and losses because nobody comes to their rescue when they are in legal trouble. I decided that I must do something for changing the situation.  I have earned sufficient in my life and it is my turn to do something noble for the society.

 

Businessmen READ CAREFULLY CLICK www.dayalmummedia.com

 

See your business grow multifold at ZERO COST.

Employees LIFE TIME jobs. READ CAREFULLY Click http://www.dayalmummedia.com/update.htm

Enjoy Job Security, Earn salaries compatible with your qualification and experience. Live a Life Free of Job Pressure and Uncertainties

UAE millions Arab legal team for those who don’t know English, 99% lose job 2013 all Arab work eanglish and Arabic. No English no jobs

UAE passport local 200 square ft. place per month Dh 25,000  up to 50,000 click here!

One million building and UAE passport local is only 890,000 people. Local Dubai UAE one million building I want one million branches of franchises of Fame. I want UAE, locaI I will give all local citizen channel partner make each building near the home area 200 square ft. place easily making per month 10 to 15 % net income media 25,000 within the 1 to 2 years up to 50,000. All local happy, this grow its family membership within 10 years making more than 5 million. This project I offer HH. Dhahi Kalfan Sheikh of the Law. You all local please read our petition -click here!

Contact Mr. Dayal and read our website proper and grow Dubai UAE number 1. This law firm declares in February and 50% residence expense go down. If UAE local take order from Dubai court

7 King Who control my project DAYALMUMMEDIA.COM? Who Declare Commercial media free, who Grow  UAE .

WHO Rulers or Police meeting with Dayal 0507570737 Dubai

 

 

2 AFFIDAVIT PLAYS BRIBE WITH MY LIFE IS IN DANGER?

 My witness 5000 e-mail & 100 fax: address

My life is in danger why my duplicate Gandhi work has been attacked 11times. and I have made 1000 DVD copes of criminal evidences that  has done to me and I have distributed those to my friends, staffs and. if anything wrong happens with me, all my defendant, u a e lawbreakers,  wrong-doers are responsible. Even if one Indian dies then 100 cores Indian will be saved through my deed/services

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai for 14 years.

I talk 6 may with Dhahi Khalfan  meeting Captain Ahmed0506541188  6,10 &29  may I mete 24/5/2012 MY MEETING IS WITH human rights h h Shaikh mahmd,jasam, 046082660 & Mr. Majid Captain  050-1848228, 04-6082321 I mete 2692222 ,6099999 6096666  6096272   8004888, 2292222 ,6095555, 04-2036398,2036390 khalil CID MD every day I call and remind But no progress from six months till this day no help Why? & why no help u ae 7 Police King? Dubai, uae not united?

Now I am Dubai, Raj is here in Dubai and SCB is also here I need justice au a e 7 Rulers or 7 Police King give me?

My 14 years research and actual experience crime 100% evidences with me read carefull a to z

 

Why damage 99% Arab 22 country? Bribe Plays Arab IF Dubai not control Bribe 100% damage Arab all King Domy2013

 

Subject: After How many mafia in the world but no body show evident or picture about their mafia world but I m giving evidence with picture in their file It is a recognized fact that a Dubai lawbreaker can break the laws with influence once twice, however, if there is breaking of law every time, the same is possible only and only with Bribe power. The Dubai law breakers have to be put before I gave BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E or UNO human rights so that they are exposed BRIBE.

 

Police & LAW not control claim 100% damage Arab all King Domy2013

 

 

lawyer or ministers, Police King of world 99.99% fight for money only damage reputation own mum what do think u a e lawyers,ministers ?  I know that your mum gives you a sincere birth, a dignified birth, but are you sincere today? If yes then tomorrow you can rule the world, make Millions of dollars today.  CLICK http://www.needjustice.net/file23.doc & link: Click Here

BRIBE Same - Same big Mafia control Police BRIBE & LAW crime win-win 14 years?

 

UAE 7 Rulers or 7 Police King please Checks plays bribe with uae or Nat Checks Raj crime.

Dubai police cars damaged Bernard Raj, Keith intl LLC workers,

Checks Raj crime. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003980549_dubai29.html ?

Checks Raj crime.http://www.keralamonitor.com/suicidemedia.htm   Grow UAE?

Dhs.20 about five suicides one week, check

For an advance of Dhs. 20 a worker killed himself. Is this not a shame, how can this be tolerated by Dubai government

Checks Raj crime. http://moia.gov.in/writereaddata/pdf/PAC_LIST.pdf  Grow UAE?

BLACKLISTED FOREIGN 4 BESCO intl LLC. DUBAI UAE & Ukraine

Criminal Raj and this SC Bank is the world’s dominating BRIBE power into existence 99.99% UAE

 

lawyer or ministers of world 99.99% fight for money only damage reputation own mum what do think u a e lawyers,ministers ?  I know that your mum gives you a sincere birth, a dignified birth, but are you sincere today? If yes then tomorrow you can rule the world, make Millions of dollars today.  CLICK http://www.needjustice.net/file23.doc

Now any countries anybody fights own case without lawyer plus his wife can fight for his wife or his son or his daughter of his father.  But Indians or Asian fight for justice will be cheated injustice

All cases Raj Police BRIBE 2198/2012, 1246/99,658/2001, 827/2001,557/98,183/2000,157/2000 INJUSTICE

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E  LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/012,1246/99,1555/012?

PLAYS BRIBE WITH POLICE AND LAW, BANKS, AND LOCAL PARTNERS ETC WHO COME U A E

INJUSTICE BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E.Checks needjustice_Case_10

I even sent legal notices in 2006 and 2008 to Raj Bernard, Dar al Adallah, Haris Accounting and Auditing, Central bank of UAE and Standard chartered bank (UK London) for all the injustice I suffered.

Dubai Criminal Raj Cases No.899/98,2129/98,3046/99,4047/99,5125/99,2905/99,13021/99,

Criminal Cases against Ajman, Raj 10 days in jail 1998

17/6/98 Dubai Court Justice 4/8/98 S C Bank Crime Power Control Support Crime Dubai Court

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E ’S LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE

 JUSTICE IN THAT U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/012, 1246/99, 1555/012?

Stewart Hamond Nationality: British

According to the copy, we were sure that the cheque was forge and that was why we refused to fulfill the cheque.

10

3

Only Dubai Raffaa Police a agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents

7

Only Dubai Raffaa Police a agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents

8

clip_image001

 

http://www.needjustice.net/UAE_files/image001.jpghttp://www.needjustice.net/UAE_files/image002.jpg

 

Payments of Dhs. 1,408,124 term-insurance 1 GCC big damage billions of dollars claim

 

 

 

 

Only Dubai Raffaa Police a agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents.

Besco LLl. Letterhead Dhs. 1,408124. Criminal Raj Bernard  sign

A bank guarantee cheque is as good as a bank draft. Officers of Standard Chartered Bank committed a crime with support of Raj Bernard of Besco International by issuing two cheques to me totalling 300,000 and not honouring them when presented. In addition I have paid 1.4m aed in respect of GCC gulf damages (1998) to the same parties Now, it’s a big damage claim and that is the reason Insurance company S C Bank doesn’t want to pay the claim. Raj and this SC Bank is the world’s dominating power into existence. Anyone in the court, either lawyers or judges, can misuse it and defame

When SCB cannot pay Dhs 300,000 bank guarantee, how will they pay me this claim? Will they not buy the entire legal/ judicial system this time? I can prove Raj has back-up of SCB’s money power. How? On 5th August 1998 SCB on its own letterhead had written to Rafaa police that Besco llc. account has to pay a loan to bank in 5th paragraph, and on 4th August written statement is also given by SCB that two officers had certified cheques, this proves Raj bribed the SCB officers in this crime. If Raj now says anything SCB loses its reputation around the world so SCB plays with law be joining hands with Raj and with help of some officers of Dubai court even attempted to kill me.  Case no.2198/2012, case no 1246.99 many officers have been involved and illegally got involved and once bitten by Raj is bit by willingly or unwillingly by Raj. This is nature’s law he makes every one helpless by committing one mistake and later every time he has to be supporting Raj, with or without his wishes.

 

I am 64 years old now, and a heart patient. This amount will not do any good to me. And I do not want to give it to my family, because such a big amount will make my children lazy and they may misuse it too. So I have given a power of attorney and my passport as ID to the Dubai Court I want Justice.

WHO u a e lawyer or ministers or u a e 7 Rulers or 7 Police King sincere today 99.99%?

 

Make Police Criminal Complaint against Quick Make Millions of dollars damages today.

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS no help uae Police

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

Dubai Criminal Free investor Jail?

My Billions of dollars claim against millions of dollars Bribe Plays Dubai Police.

In 1991 the whole world could not control one Iraki Saddam Hussain.• In the same way one Criminal Raj Bernard   is controlling all of the ministry of Dubai .  Why have they given him so much power H.H . Police King Dhahi Khalfan ? PLAYS BRIBE WITH Police and LAW,

BANKS, AND LOCAL PARTNERS ETC

 

WHO Give Power Dubai Raffaa Police 100% damage reputation 7 King Why?

 

WHO Run Dubai court? H.H .Shaikh Maktoum or Raj Crime money power?

 

WHO Pay money Dubai Police Criminal Raj or H.H .Shaikh Maktoum?

 

In the name of God, the beneficent, the most merciful Grow Dubai

 

S C Bank   Each of these files is worth billions of dollars

 

4/8/98 UPTO TODAY BRIBE DOMINATING WITH PLAYS U A E 7RULERS OR 7POLICE KING

UAE mafia PLAYS WITH BRIBE?  100% evidence with picture100% damage 7 King

THE S C BANK ENSLAVED DUBAI (UAE) IN OUR ENSLAVED MUSLIM COUNTRY NO HINDU SLAVE CAN RULE OVER OUR EMPIRES.

WE ARE UNDOUBTEDLY THAT LITTLE ENGLAND S C BANK AS DECLARED BY FRANCE BUT HOWEVER BY CRIMES WE ARE GREAT BRITAIN.

S C BANK’S HAVE GIVEN SUCH CRIMINAL EVIDENCES IN UAE WHICH SHOULD BE RECORDED IN THE GUINESS BOOKS OF RECORDS.

S C BANK’ SOUR MIGHT IS RIGHT AND OUR MONEY CANS BY ANY CITIZEN ANY WHERE IN UAE. IN UAE EVERY WHERE WHERE S C BANK’ MONEY POWER IS THERE WE CAN MANIPULATE THE CIVIL LAW INTO CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST YOU AND WE WILL PROVE THAT WE ARE ALWAYS RIGHT EVEN IF WE INDEED WRONG OTHERWISE

BEING S C BANK  WE CANNOT AFFORD TO LOOSE OUR FACE. BESIDES THIS THE HINDU AND MUSLIM ARE OUR SLAVE AND BEING IN DUBAI (UAE) IN OUR ENSLAVED MUSLIM COUNTRY NO HINDU SLAVE CAN RULE OVER OUR EMPIRES.

THE SC BANK WAS FURIOUS AND THREATENED ME BY DECLARING THAT BY THE POLICE COMPLAINT YOU (DAYAL) HAVE INVITED YOUR TORTUROUS DEATH. THE BANK SAID INSTEAD OF GOING TO THE POLICE YOU COULD HAVE EXPLOITED US BY CLAIMING BILLIONS POUNDS IN DAMAGES BUT INSTEAD YOU ATTACKED US BUT NOW WE CAN ALSO CANNOT ACCEPT YOUR VERSION AND NOW IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU SHOULD BE KILLE DUBAI POLICE.

S C BANK’ SOUR MIGHT IS RIGHT AND OUR MILLIONS POUNDS CANS BY ANY CITIZEN POLICE ANY WHERE IN UAE.

BECAUSE BRIBE PLAYS DUBAI POLICE IT IS EASY TO FINISH YOU IN UAE

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

 Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS no help uae Police

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

 

SCB letterhead says they gave bank guarantee in 1996. Why and who would wait for 2 years to not collect money. It was not a small amount and for 2 cheques?

 

Copy of cheque 404976 in my favour for the amount of 200,000 which has a legal alteration with stamp and signature

Only In Dubai and UAE the bank returns the bank guarantee cheque refer to     drawer.

2)      Only in Dubai, Money and Power have more say than Law.

3)      Only Dubai Government can except that 15th October 1998 comes before 5th August 1998.

4)      Only in Dubai a Crime is committed by a Person for it’s own loss.

5)      Only Dubai Government agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents.

6)      Only Dubai Government believes that a Bank Guarantee cheque received by someone for

300,000 dirhams in 1996 and the person waits for 2 years for his own money, and recovers

the money after doing a crime.

7)      If an Indian Citizen’s Bank Guarantee cheque in Dubai is returned, then an Indian Citizen

has no right to take the matter to the court. If this is done then a Case will be filed against the

Indian Citizen. Pressure is being put on him to make him sit down and not to appeal against  this injustice

8)      Only in Dubai Hospital on 10th July 1999, Indian Citizen’s Heart Operation is cancelled  before 5 minutes it was supposed to be commenced.

9)     25 years Dubai Resident Indian Citizen does not get justice for 14 years from Dubai Court.

My Pleading: please re-open the above 5 cases and ask raj how did he get the 2 bank guarantee cheque and if he had paid the amounts via drydocks why did he issue more 3+12 pdc’s in 1998besco letterhead)

(Very importantly: I want to know how did he get bank certified cheques from standard chartered bank? ) read 5th Aug. 1998 see how many lies and discrepancies have been committed by Standard chartered bank and Dubai legal judiciary & police have all followed this one misleading statement)

if you will investigate see how many cases are registered but by bribing he finishes all the cases. check for his labor file see how he gets his employees bank loans of amounts of Dhs 200,000 – 300,000, sanctioned. min. one year salaries not paid to EMPLOYEES ( raj issues letter for employees loan to the bank)

( even though he was wanted he got 8 companies registered, even though his company Besco international was wanted- in the Dubai court at the time of filing case raj registers company address; which is not existing

, in 2010 there is a beauty parlour since 2005 in the  address mentioned in the court file )

Raj has taken loans from not one bank but several banks in the employees name, on behalf of the company, and later has deported them, further he makes for them new passports and get them back in Dubai on new passports, all such deeds only Raj can do, all cheating the law, civilian, poor or big businessmen is his trick of trade, he is a criminal not only in Dubai but is also wanted in Qatar, Ukraine and many other cities for similar crimes.

CRIMINAL FREE

اسم الشخص :  – YETES POTHY SEBASTIAN SEBASTIANرقم الجواز :  – H3447686اسم الشركة :  – KEITH INTERNATIONAL

 

اسم الشخص : – AVGUSTINE SEBASTIAN THAYYILرقم الجواز : – A7423312اسم الشركة : – BENTON INTERNATIONAL LLc.

 

In India his company is blacklisted. In Dubai Besco International is blacklisted. And then establishing new companies under same license is also a crime/fraud.

If you will check his back records of the 8 companies he registered since 1995 till date. You will see he was declared bankrupt in Besco international and later he registered the same bankrupt license in different new company names with different locals, he has committed crime and fraud by doing so, see how many officers have been involved in doing such acts... And how did he do all this? It means even Economic department has encouraged in helping him in doing these crimes. Minimum 1000 of people are involved in doing the above mentioned changing of name of bankrupt license, and min. 1000 of labour cases you will find in the name of Besco intl. and other formed company’s by Raj Bernard.

Criminal K L Bernard Raj 8  Company's 1Besco intl 2 Besco llc 3 Bintun international 4 Bintun llc 5 Ar99 trading llc 6 Kith international overseas7 Kith international  8 Kith international group

his local partners must be having all these information and is supporting crime.

Why Dubai locals don’t care for respect and reputation of Dubai?

Dubai, (with due respect) is land of Arab’s but is being cheated by Raj, and local departments are helping him in such illegal activities.

No one cares for Dubai’s reputation & respect?

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

Dubai Criminal Cases No 2189/2012 & Dubai Criminal Cases No 1246/99

Dubai King Dom Criminal Free .investor Jail

Case No: 903/98&557/98, was dismissed. PLAYS BRIBE WITH?  557/98

 

How many Law breaker help Crime

S C Bank   Each of these files is worth billions of dollars

Only Dubai Raffaa Police a agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents

Dubai Criminal Cases No 2189/2012

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

15/11/2011 Nieva release me without taking any statement 14th November I was in jail illegal I suffer night heartache check Rashid hospital record.  And 15th November criminal Raj went to HQ same my document and download my pen drive and HQ police made my against. Before 15 Novemeber no any complaint criminal Raj registered my against.  If any complain registered my against I am already at Police custody.  27 October 2011 Police not release me.  This conform thaqt no criminal complaint registered before 15 th November.

28/7/2011 This wrong statement declared if the brain was used 28 July, 2011 case number mentioned is 2012.  This case was built 23 January 2012.  Who made this statement public prosecutor you show me in the computr. Which computer registered this complaint 28 July 2011.  This way public prosecutor support crime.

Criminal Raj go public prosecutor and this pre plann  put me in the building no.3 cold room.Irequest 25th March my date court number but did not send me to Central Jail and 1st April also Nieva not send message in the Central Jail.  You check Jail record no my name record in the 1st April in the court date.  This prove Nieva misusing Central Jail.

I requesyt the jail to send me to the court and they were talking wrong that I will not goto court.. Central Jail asked to take my signature

No any information fame..ae against any Besco company or Raj against but headquarters of Police damged investors.

This statement Bernard Raj give Headquarters put my wife name Pooja illegal and damaged my multi-million dollar Dubai grow project Dayalmummedia.com

 

Exhibit no. 9. Hospital ID no. 7611331) Rashid hospital.

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS no help uae Police

I am fighting against injustice since 14 years but no one cares to even listen. I am not doing this for myself I am bringing to your kind attention the misconducts, misdemeanor, frauds and criminal actions that even were causes of suicides in the city due to Raj, Standard chartered bank, and other legal/judicial/ protective authorities in Dubai who support crime.

Such people are being helped and those who live in Dubai, respectfully for more than 34 years without any criminal record are being tortured.

To suppress / hide one crime 100’s of crimes are made, thereafter. For one case injustice I lost two big brothers, in heart failure. In 98, 99 I suffered heart attacks and was even tried to kill. Threat was given to pressure me, that I would die on the operation table.

 

1st July 1999, Doctor Redhwan gave an un-fair statement that stent was not available, and it was cancelled just 5 minutes before the time of operation. 1st July 1999If the record of hospital will be checked you will see the same stent was used for another operation on the same day. I had date of 18/10/2011 Rashid hospital cancelled my Heart operation I did not attend, why central jail Nut sent me Heart operation

1st July 1999, hospital called me and asked me to get admitted on 8th july 1999– and that the stent was available. Accordingly I was admitted in Dubai Hospital on 8th july 1999. On 9th july 1999 I received a call that I should take back all the cases against Raj Bernard and SCB and if I don’t do so then maybe during operation an accident can occur and I will be declared dead. When my arteries were blocked as you can read – all the 3 – one 100%, one 90% and one 65% and if someone in this state receives a call in this way – then you can understand what can happen – he can die on the spot. And the next day really it happened – my operation was cancelled – Dr Redhwan cancelled the operation. This proves that so big hospital was also under the SCB and Raj, they had powers and Dr Redhwan was good as he could not kill me but cancelled the operation.

My other brother also expired 1999 he received some Raj strange call

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

 

Civil case no. 157/2000 Khaleej Times

The case against the Khaleej Times started on 28 January 1999 - Alliance Insurance Company issued – coverage starting from 28/01/1999 to 27/01/2000  (Insurance Coverage).  It is clearly seen on the copy that 2000 it is over written but the starting date is genuine. I have a copy of this as proof.

The coverage was due to be paid on the death of my brother which was certified by Dubai Hospital. Time of death date 29/01/99. Why has this claim not been received to date?

Pur Dubai Police29/1/2012 even beaten I suffered heart pain, and my dentures were also damaged Check Cases no2198/2012

 

Central jail cancelled my Dubai Court 25th March 2012 Check Cases no2198/2012 I am Central jail building no. 3 for 5 days.22 to 26

 

For an advance of Dhs. 20 a worker killed himself. Is this not a shame, how can this be tolerated by Dubai government

Cases no2198/2012

Statement Bernard Raj give 5/12/2011

This statement Bernard Raj give Headquarters put my wife name Pooja illegal and damaged my multi-million dollar Dubai grow project Dayalmummedia.com

All the seven Rulers of Emirates please check my website www.dayalmummedia.com

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

?

CBI BANK 827/2001

1.      FDeposit on 3702020225 Deposit receipt in name of my wife, only. Pooja’s without my wife Pooja’s signature withdrawn how??

2.        Bank debited my wife’s FD of an amount Dhs 425,750 without  not Under Lien, and without I reported to Central Bank of Dubai Authorities for justice, but once again I failed.

Why are we facing so many injustices in Dubai? Who will stop this, without my wife’s signature this amount was debited by a bank; an institution and there is no one to justify such offenses. this is the public prosecutor and the courts letter – on 20th feb. 2000, he did not attend the hearing and court gave decision of Jail. His passport is till today in the police station. Bank was not taking action on High  Rose and I had to recover my amount as the bank was each time saying that I was the guarantor so I took action and filed a case against High Rose, at Bur Dubai police station and against dhs 150,000/ we do not get bail easily. But High Rose had banks support and don’t know how he was released by submitting 2 passports and was released on bail. His judgment was on 20th feb. 2001, if he pays me money or goes

SEEMS THAT THEY WERE PRESSURIZED BY OUR UAE MINISTRY Dubai courts and Honorable Judges all want to stress and kill a heart patient & BY THE BRITISH CONNECTION THEY DID NOT DO ANY THING FURTHER. NOT ONLY THAT I CAME IN TO FURTHER FINANCIAL LOSS AS

K.K. Sarachandra Bose take birth that make money easily and can easily cross the limits of integrity

(PARTNER) Dar Al-Adalah Advocates & Legal Consultants

BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E.2006

5Checks needjustice_Case_10

I even sent legal notices in 2006 and 2008 to Raj Bernard, Dar al Adallah, Haris Accounting and Auditing, Central bank of UAE and Standard chartered bank (UK London) for all the injustice I suffered.

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

My lawyers K.K. Bose email From Click http://www.needjustice.net/file20.doc

Like doings of SARACHANDRA Bose www.daraladalah.com

Mr. Dayal, you and your family travel on the right path). I have a better suggestion for you, spend your money

I will not have any hesitation to file a case against you in Australia  With Best Regards, Bose.

Boselaw (PARTNER) Dar Al-Adalah Dubai

Each of these files is worth billions of dollars

PLEASE Check AUSTRLIAN this link http://www.needjustice.net/file27.docx

AUSTRLIAN JUDGES CONSPIRE TO SELL OF MY PROPERTIES AS WELL Iraqi born Australian citizen Dr. Thamir Karam is controlling the entire ministry of Australia

These 4 projects are of billions which will run on the finance provided by an Innocent NRI Hindu Lady donating her commercial freehold land property. This is not a property but is a diamond quarry for the future of Indian Hindu Muslim Young/Retired all Professionals. Our New Concept, where you will get  salary on per hours charges.

Link: Click Here

Or Link: http://www.loungetec.com/narayan/narayan/3103/indexa.htm

Raj came to my home and told me that his business partner (local) is from a sheik family and he had a big amount in the standard charted bank. For this reason standard charted bank has given me the guaranty. He also told me that his sister is going to get married and asked me a personal loan of amount 500,000 and tat he would provide a certified bank guaranty cheque. He brought photo copies of 3 cheques with out date in my favor. I had seen the bank guaranty and gave him 300,000 during the period November / December 1997. after words he gave me original cherubs due on 1998. He went to India for the purpose of his sister’s marriage.

Note: the first 3 cheques are guarantied by standard charted bank guaranty cheques. The numbers are 404975 and 404976 and 404977. I had not received the first cheque with number 404975 and so I had replied him that I did not receive this cheque.

S C Bank   Each of these files is worth billions of dollars

Only Dubai Raffaa Police a agrees to Photocopied Documents and not the Original Documents

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS

Al Khaleej

Advocates & Legal Consultants

Abdullah Taleb Consultants

 

Al Refah Police Station

Case No. (Illigible)

Plaintiff:

Mansukhani Dayal Hassaram, Indian National Tel: 536069

Represented by Advocates / Obaid Ali Obaid and Abdullah Taleb Mohd.

Defendant:

Mr. David Martin – in his capacity as the manager of Standard Chartered Bank.  Address:  Bur Dubai, near Ramada Hotel, Tel: 520455.

 

Facts:

1.     Mr. Kuresapan Bernard Raj, in his capacity as the general manager of Besco International has issued a cheque No. 404977 for the benefit of the plaintiff drawn to standard Chartered Bank for the value of Dhs. 100,000 – due to be paid on 15/7/1998.  The said bank certified the cheque and guaranteed settlement of its value on its due date.

2.     The plaintiff submitted the said cheque to the said bank for collection. The bank refused settlement of the cheque and requested the plaintiff to refer to the drawer because there was no balance to the account.

3.     As stated in article No. 600 of the commercial dealings law, that certification of the cheque by the said bank means that there was balance in the account to settle the said cheque and having the same balance kept in the account was the responsibility of the bank.

4.     And as he act of the said bank forms a crime of non-settlement of the cheque with bad intention, which is punished by article (402) of the punishment law No.3 of 1987, and also by article (641) of the commercial dealings law No. (18) of 1993.

Therefore:

 

Please kindly take all the necessary procedures against the defendant for justice with reserving the rights of the plaintiff for claiming the value of the cheque and the compensation for the damages incurred by him, and consider him alleging for his personal right against the defendant.

 

With due respect

 

 

(Signed)

Advocate / Obaid Ali Obaid

1)The above letter is issued on 5th august 1998 where Mr S. Hamond has mentioned in clause no. 4 – that I (Dayal) had deposited this cheque on 15/10/98 and so they refused my payment, if you note the date when this letter is given to rafaa police station on 5th august 1998 – which means about 70 days ahead of the cheque being deposited the statement has been given by the SCB officer Mr S Hammond ( the day was not due and this statement was given) very important: this chq. Has alteration but bank rubber stamp and officer’s Mr. S. Ranjith’s signature was present and this cheque was not due and I had not even deposited to the bank when this statement was given and this officer was still working there during that time.

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

Standard Chartered Bank  

Group Investigations                                                                  

P. O. Box: 999                                                                                

Dubai                                                                                              

United Arab Emirates                                                                       

Tel : +971(4)507 0670                                                                     

Fax: +971(4)521 827                                                                  

05.08.1998

Al Rafa Police Station      

 

 

Complainant: Standard Chartered Bank   

 

Complainee: Dayal Mansukhani                

Residing at apartment No. 302, Al Mansour Building, near Ramada Hotel, Bur Dubai.

Report under Articles 216 – 34/399 of the punishment law of 1987.

Director, Al Rafa Police Station      

 

Please permit us to furnish the following:          

 

1-      The above complainant is a bank established in England and licensed to operate in Dubai (the Bank).

2-      The complainee is an Indian national, residing at the above-mentioned address.

3-      The bank has previously approved the cheque No. 404976, drawn to the account of Besco International at the bank, for the benefit of the

4-      above-mentioned complainee for an amount of Dirhams One Hundred Thousand (200,000) provided that the same is presented on a specified

5-      date, which is 15.06.1996. (Copy attached)

6-   On 15.10.1998, the complainee presented the cheque to the bank and requested the value of the same.

7-   Upon perusal, it appeared that there is a clear alteration on the due date specified on the cheque.

8-   Therefore, the bank refused to pay the value of the cheque (Original attached).

 

9-      In addition to the above-mentioned, the issuer of the cheque, Besco International, did not have a credit balance on the date when the

10-  cheque was presented, but was indebted to the bank for an amount that exceeds the value of the cheque.

7-      One of the persons, who signed the approval of the cheqe on behalf of the complainant bank, left the service at the bank since 1996, and the other one left the said branch since 1996 and has been transferred to the branch of the bank in Qatar since April 1997. The book from which the cheques were drawn has been given in 1995.

 

8-      The complainant bank sees that the act of the complainee in seeking taking over the bank’s money in the said manner is considered a violation to Articles 216 and 399 read with Article 34 of the punishment law.

Therefore, the matter requires taking the necessary procedures in pursuing the complainee and anyone proved to be involved in approving such fraud manner.

 

 

Thanks and regards.               

 

Stewart Hamond                                                                                

(Signed)                                                                            

 

 

 

 

1 Above letter confirms that the bank is London based.

 

2)  It also confirms that it has certified the cheques.

 

3 TO CONTINUE WITH THEIR CRIMES IN UAE.THE SAID BANK LETTER HEAD IS POSTED IN THE LINK.THE LETTER HEAD ALSO CONFIRMS THAT THE BANK HAS ISSUED TWO GUARRENTY CERTIFIED CHEQUES TO DAYAL IN DUBAI.

4 STUDY THE LINKS PROVIDED CAREFULLY AND YOU SHALL REALIZE THE BRITISH CAPACITIES EVEN TO REVERSE THE TIME

 

S C BANK’S LETTER HEAD DATED 5TH AUGUST 1998 IS WITH ME AND IN THE SAID LETTER IT IS MENTIONED THAT I (DAYAL) HAS DEPOSITED THE SAID CHEQUE ON 15TH OCTOBER 1998 AND IT PROVES THAT OCTOBER COMES BEFORE 5 AUGUST IN Dubai Rafaa Police. for a cheque dated.

 

No one can prove 15October 98 comes before 5 August 98) Please note this properly But SCB proves in a letter dated 5.8.98, Para. 4

5) Besco’s account was already overdrawn – there was nothing Under Lien given to the bank – which means it was illegally certified.

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT

DUBAI U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/2012, 1246/99, 1555/2012?

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS no help uae Police

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

Case Type

Year

Serial Number

Main Case Data

Case Number:    Criminal Case

2198 / 2012

Station name:

BurDubai

Report date:

July 28, 2011

Report number:

1853 / 2012

Station turn in date:

January 23, 2012

Jurisdiction session date:

First session date:

March 18, 2012

Transfer date:

February 19, 2012

Session date:

January 23, 2012

Prosecutor:

SHUAIB ALI HATAM AHLI

Judgment date:

May 6, 2012

Case Status:

Sentenced

Case Classification:

 

Misdemeanor

Jurisdiction area:

Root case:

 

/

Initial Charges

Initial Charges

Commital Charges

Commital Charges

Final Charges

No.

Accused

Charge

Punishment

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

Mr. Esam Elhamedani pleas gave me justice my 13complaint with you

1.jpg

Mr. Esam Elhamedani pleas gave me justice my 13complaint with you

2.jpg

 

 

 

Dar Al Hekma Law firm Duplicate lawyer Mr Shri Pal Jain

Mr Shri 0561700046, and 05042886453

Abdulla Abou-baker0509817297 and 0504221336

 

Mr. Shri Pal taking 50,000 Dirhams And he told me “You stop other lawyer, I control everything. Zhang & MR. RAJ BERNARD FINALIZED CHARGES WITH ME 150,000 DIRHAM’S.?

 

Dar Al Hekma Law firm Damage UAE Multi-Million Project Fame Device   Check website www.dayalmummedia.com

If this duplicate project or this people run this project similar this lawfirm is responsible.

 

4c.jpg

 

3c.jpg

 

2c.jpg

 

 

 

 

Dayal Mansukhani

Free Ad Media LLC

Atruim Center 3rd Floor 306

Bank Street Bur Dubai

 

The Chief Prosecutor

Dubai Court

Dear Sir,

A complaint Against Mr Zhang Guoyin and  Dar Al Mekma Law firm for False Pretence and Misrepresentation regarding suit number 48820/2011,

It is with profound respect and honour that I forward this present complaint and facts to your high office for your immediate reaction.

I wish to state that Mr. Zhang Guoyin use to be an employee in my establishment and he worked with me for some time until he breached the employment contract we had last year.

I had engaged his services in China from  2006 and later asked him to move to Dubai since the business was now located in Dubai. He was my main buyer and also assumed the role of main secretary and personal assistant. He therefore knew my banking information.

Mr. Zhang had illegally transferred money from my accounts in China and Australia to his account since he had my ATM card information. He obtained my ATM card information fraudulently and without my authorization cleared my accounts in Hong Kong, China and Australia. I made a complaint to the Chinese police but I later dropped the charges. He admitted the above facts in an email and I have evidence to prove the bank transfers he made to banks in China. It was not until late last year that I realized my ATM card that had gone missing in China was in his possession.  He cleared my accounts in China and Australia such that I could handle my projects both countries. These are people who tarnish the reputation of China by duplicating goods belonging to others.I hag paid up to 70 000 rmb for patent registration but he did not register the patents rights before any Chinese authority.

From 2008 to July 2010, he received money from my wife but could not setup the project. Instead he used my idea and made duplicate  products and sold in China.

 Still I hired his services and for one month to work in my company in India before moving to Dubai.

.

I also gave him the sum of thirty thousand (AED 30 000) to book a container from China to Dubai but he failed to do so and till date I have not received the container.

 

Mr. Zhang filed a compliant against me with the labour department after we had some misunderstanding over my products since it came to my knowledge that he and some other persons were duplicating my product and wanted to introduce it into the market.The labour suit was later sent to Dubai court.

I then engaged the services of Dar Al Mekma law Firm to represent me and protect my interest before the court and other authorities as the need may arise.

 

One Mr Shri Pal Jain and Mr.Abdallah Abou-baker were assigned to follow-up my case but he never deed.

The labour suit was decided in Mr. Zhang’s favour and I was asked to pay the sum of Twenty Five(AED 25 000) to the count.

I issued two checks to Mr. Shri Pal Jain,that is one a check of Twenty Five thousand (25000)  to deposit at the court registry and one of Ten thousand(10 000) to establish a civil or criminal case against Mr. Zhang. Copies of both checks are herein attached. It is to my understanding that he failed to do both and to and was left to wonder whether or not he even bothered to represent my interest in court.

Mr Shri Pal told me he had registered a compliant with Rafa Police station and that he has filed an appeal of the labour suit.It therefore seems to me that some expatriate legal consultants use the name of local law firm to deceive foreign investors. 

Since then he has not bothered to keep me informed and has been out of my reach. I honestly believe he is misrepresenting the reputation of the firm he works for as both his telephone numbers are unreachable that is 0561700046 and 05042886453.Also Mr. Abdulla Abou-baker has neither called nor brief me on the proceeding. His mobile numbers are 0509817297 and 0504221336.

It seems there have relocated to Fish Roundabout, Snow White Shop Building,2nd floor, suit number 212.

At this juncture, I have been asked to bring the passport of Mr Zhang that has been in my custody  and I have deposited the passport in Dubai court  on the 17th day of July 2011.I pray this passport should not be released as it will hold him back in the UAE until this case against him be decided.

Sir, I wish to crave your indulgence to use your high office to register this complaint if my above mentioned legal advisers have failed to establish one.

I also pray that you use your high office to bring this people to order. I am a 63 years old cardiac patient who has suffered a lot in the hand s of law breakers.I am willing to have an amicable settlement should they reply me with 24 hours and I will withdraw the compliant  failing which, the complaint stands. 

 While waiting and hoping that this complaint be taken into consideration, I wish you all the best in your endeavours. I will also send the mail to all lawyers in UAE seeking their assistance. I am willing to pay any fees to a lawyer who will provide his services.

In anticipation thereof I remain your humble complainant

 

 

Doc5

Doc4

 

 

 

 


من : ديال منسوخانى   - هندى الجنسيه
دبي ، الإمارات العربية المتحدة

الى سعادة مدير مركز شرطة الرفاعة


دبي ، الإمارات العربية المتحدة
الموضوع


يرجى زيارة
http://www.needjustice.net/file24.docx تصل إلى فهم ظلم لي وتنزيل أدلة ضد السيد عبد المجيد.

أبلغ هنا كنت أشك أن الملازم عبد المجيد فاضل من شرطة  الرفاعة ساعد بنك ستاندرد تشارترد في دبي إلى اعتراض لي في قضية كاذبة ، حيث لم يهتم للشيك الأصلي. أنا يقدم تفاصيل بضع شيكات مصدقة من بنك ستاندرد تشارترد.

1. شيك رقم : 404977
يرجع تاريخ : 5/
July/1998
المبلغ : 100000 درهم

2. شيك رقم : 404976
يرجع تاريخ : 15/
October/1998
المبلغ : 200،000 درهم

وكان السيد عبد المجيد قدم لى التعذيب  النفسى منذ عام 1998 وحتى الإمارات العربية المتحدة فقدت عدة ملايين من مشاريع حتى الآن. قد يكون قتل منذ ذلك الحين وصلتني رسائل بريدية وتعذيب العديد من السود. كان لي شكوى في محطة الشرطة في رفح شخص في نوفمبر 2011 وطلب السيد عبد المجيد. التقيت 3 التخصصات في شخص ولكن لم أتلق أي رد منهم. بعد أن سجلت المحامي بلدي شكواي مرتين مع الأدلة والصور. شكوى واحدة لا تزال غير موجودة في السجلات. وقد تسبب هذا بسبب سوء قصده.
 
كان قد يساء استخدامها في الشكوى على هذه الشيكات التي كان قد صادق البنك كما أشير إلى الدرج. أصدر الجنائية والمحاصرين المستثمر. وقال انه بعث المدعي العام الذي كان قد اتهم في قضية 160/1999 كاذبة ضدي. نتيجة لهذه الحالة كاذبة بنوا قضية جنائية رفعت (القضية رقم 1246/1999) ضدي. وأود أن استدعاء الضابط الذي سحب الشيك للمحكمة. في اسم القرآن الكريم وأود أن أسأله في الضغوط التي قد أعدت التقرير انه من الشيكات التي كان مخطئا في عام 1998 ، 1996. أشك في ذلك حتى سعادة عبدالمجيد عبدالله كان قد كتب شكوى على الاختيار الثاني في 5 أغسطس 1998 إلى مركز الشرطة في رأس الرسالة رافا البنك.
هناك اكثر من 70 يوما لتاريخ الاستحقاق. ويمكن أي واحد إساءة ضابط ليس في كل علم القانون وضابط مماثل هنا منذ عام 1998.

 وأود أن تسجيل قضية جنائية في اسمه الذي كان سوء السلوك في المحكمة وبالتالي افساد سمعة الشرطة في العالم.الآن أطلب إلى هذه المحطة الرئيسية لمكافحة سوء السلوك من السيد عبد المجيد وأرسله إلى المدعي العام في محكمة دبي. سوف أحارب نفسي بما أنني الأب للقانون وانا سجلت شكوى ضد راج برنار. إذا كان الذباب بعيدا عن دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة ، فإنه قد يسبب المليارات من الأضرار الناجمة عن المحطة.
 
الإمارات العربية المتحدة هي بلدي وأنا أريد أن ينمو مع الإسلام ذهني غاندي مكررة. لقد كنت هنا في الإمارات العربية المتحدة على مدى السنوات ال 34 الماضية. كثير من الناس يأتون إلى دبي لإساءة استخدام القوة الجنائية ويفسد سمعة دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة. وأرفق بهذا
www.dayalmummedia.com موقعي الذي يثبت اهتمامي أن ينمو الإسلام


هذا ولسيادتكم جزيل الشكر

وتفضلوا بقبول فائق الاحترام

 

 

ديال منسوخان

            050 7570737 

 

 

THE HUMBLE PETITION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER ABOVENAMED

 

1        The petitioner is a Citizen of India having his address at as stated above in the cause title of the petition. The respondent NO. 1 is a Scheduled Bank, having its Head Office at United Kingdom. The respondent NO. 2 is a company duly registered under the company law of UAE.

2        The petitioner is a Businessmen and he was running his business from Dubai, UAE for around 25 years. The petitioner has traded and carried out business in Transportation, Textile trading, Finance etc. the petitioner has financed many individual and organization in Dubai. The petitioner has a good reputation in Dubai trade circle as he is very successful businessman. Though the petitioner has many friends in Dubai business class he has also attracted some enemies due to business competition.

3        The petitioner has financed respondents NO. 2 around 3 million Dhr. For different years, this finance was spread upto 2 years. All this financial transaction was by cheque payment. The respondent NO. 2 for discharging his legal debt issued some post dated Cheques in favour of the petitioner, a few Cheques were drawn on respondent NO. 1 Bank. Interestingly some Cheques were having endorsement from the respondent NO. 1 Bank “we guarantee that this cheque is good for payment on 15.10.98” believing the endorsement the petitioner agreed to accept post dated Cheques. Hereto annexed and Marked Exhibit A and B are the cheque dated __________ and ____________ respectively.

4        To the shock and surprise of the petitioner these bank guarantee cheque were dishonored by the respondent NO. 1 Bank. Initially the bank gave vague reasons for dishonoring the cheque but subsequently they stated in their memo that there are alteration in the Cheques as far as date are concerned. The petitioner challenged that contention the matter was highly contested and ultimately it was held that the bank officers were responsible for the alteration if any and they have endorsed their signature at the place of alteration. Hereto annexed and marked Exhibit C is the copy of the Forensic Lab report dated ___________.

5        The petitioner submits that once it was made clear that I was not responsible for the alteration in the cheques I should be given the cheque amount but surprisingly the bank and public prosecutor delayed that matter and when ultimately when the cheque was handed over to me the time for presenting  the same lapsed. This way the public prosecutor and Dubai police is also responsible for causing delay under the guise of investigation. I reserve my right to sue them as and when situation permits.

6        The brief facts about the lis between the petitioner and the respondents is as under:-

a        the petitioner went to dubai in around may 1977. he is a bussinesman his bussiness in dubai includes-Transportation, Cars selling and buying, Man Power supply- Whole sale Textile, and Financial support/Investor.

B       BESCO- the respondent no. 2  It’s a Dubai Govt. Undertaking run by Dubai Labor Ministry. One Al Mullah is the Owner, who is in Business of Supplying Manpower from Asia and particularly from India.

C       Dubai Dry Dock is another such company managed by the Dubai Government.

D       One RAJ BERNARD is an Employee of BESCO holding a Managerial Capacity in BESCO.

E       I financed BESCO since 1995 to 1997 Dec. I financed around 3 Million Dhm. To this company. Out of which I recovered around 1.8 Million and the outstanding is around 1.2 Millions.

F       In December 1997 we have entered into New Agreement and BESCO issued me through Mr. Raj Bernard New Cheques for Balance amount. The balance amount was divided into 12 different Cheques, payable in installment.

G       All these 12 Cheques were returned dishonored at different time and period. Besides these 12 Cheques 2 other Cheques were issued drawn at ----- Bank with Bank guarantee, these two Cheques were also returned dishonored. ( all during the 8 months period)

H       All these Cheques were signed by Mr. Raj Bernard on behalf of BESCO.

I        initially when the Cheques were returned dishonored I warn Mr. Raj Bernard on telephone.

J        I filed a criminal case in Feb 1998 in Dubai Court. For 2.23. Lakhs Dhm. The amount being of two Cheques. ( pending this case my other Cheques were also returned dishonored)

K       (I believe In UAE according to its law the place of issuance consideration is the place of filing of criminal complaint irrespective of the place of issuance of Cheques)

L       Accordingly I filed complained in Dubai, Sharjah, and Ajman.  Against Mr. Raj Bernard.

M      All these cases proceeded simultaneously in different courts.

N       The Dubai Court case concluded in July 1998. The court ordered and directed Mr. Bernard to pay me Cheques amount and he was fined for 2000 Dhm. This money was deposited in court which was afterward on given to me.

O       In sharjah court the court directed the case to be transferred to Dubai court.

P       Similarly the Ajman court also taken similar view.

Q       In mean time the accused was put in police custody for around 10 days.

R       Finally the Dubai court decided the cases so transferred to it and dismissed the case holding that I should file civil case.

S       I filed civil case in 2000, being case No. 183 of 2000 the civil court ordered in my favour around 6 lakhs dhr. Aggrieved by this ordered we both went in to appeal.

T       The appellate court dismissed my appeal and allowed the appeal of Mr. Raj Bernard.

U       I went to Supreme Court in 2005 my appeal in Supreme Court was also dismissed.*

W      I instructed my lawyer Mr. Bose to file civil case who following my instruction transferred theses cases to local lawyer.

X       Thus I filed civil case against Raj Bernard.*

Y       In the mean time out of the two Cheques drawn at --- Bank one Cheque returned dishonored, despite Bank assurance to Good Cheques. The Cheques returned with the remark refer to drawer. When I confronted with the officers of the --- bank they told me that bank Guarantee Cheques have been discontinued, and there is some fraud in issuance of this Cheques some Bank Officers might be involved.

Z       Subsequently the --- bank dismissed its employee who has made endorsement on the Cheques.

Za      I again represented the Cheques with the Bank this time the remark was alteration in Cheques.

Zb     On the third time of my presenting the Cheques the Bank remarked alteration in date.

Zc      I instructed my lawyer to issue notice to --- Bank, he accordingly sent notice on 2/8/98 ( Lawyer All Kaleen )

Zd     On 5/8/98 the --- Bank filed complaint against me with Dubai Police regarding Cheques No. 404976 ironically this Cheques was never presented with the Bank)

Ze      The police sent the said Cheques with the Forensic lab Dubai for investigation. Even in this matter thee is no reference o Cheques No. 4049776.

Zf      The lab submitted the report that the Cheques looks as of 1996, there were three dated on the Cheques put by Mr. Raj Bernard and two Bank officers.

Zg      The Dubai Police sent the matter to court.

Zh     The court fined me 2000 Dhm. I paid the penalty and demanded the Cheques back.

Zi      Since the Cheques was not returned to me I went to appeal court, the appeal court dismissed my appeal on fine part but directed to return the Cheques to me.

Zj      Against this order both myself and Mr. Raj Bernard went to Supreme Court where the humble court continued my fine but ordered to return the Cheques back to me.

Zk     In the mean time the other Cheques being chq No. 4049776 dated Oct 15 1998 matured and I presented the Cheques in --- Bank, surprisingly the --- bank without returning the Cheques to my Banker sent the Cheques to Dubai Police, which was informed to me by -- Bank.

Zl      The Dubai Police ordered me o furnish bail Bond. And Cheques was sent to Forensic Lab.

Zm    In Feb 1999 the Forensic lab sent its report that there is no illegal alteration on the said Cheques.

Zn     The public prosecutor again sent the said Cheques for reexamination to the laboratory.

Zo     The second report of the Forensic lab again concluded that thee is no illegal alteration on the Cheques.

Zp     The public prosecutor directed the police to drop the case against me and return the Cheques to me. The Cheques was returned to me on 28/4/1999.

Zq     I presented the Cheques with the Banker on 29/4/99 the same returned dishonored on the ground that the cheque was out of limitation.

Zr      Thereafter I went to London before the Banking Ombudsman of == bank. I registered the complaint in around 2000 Sept. in Oct 2000 the Ombudsman rejected my complaint saying they do not have jurisdiction over the Dubai Bank.

Zs      I have not filed any legal proceedings for the recovery of the cheque amount.

Zt      In Jan 1999 Mr. Raj Bernard filed one case against me for recovery of 1 Million Dhm. The court ordered Mr. Raj Bernard to submit account with the court. He could not submit the account for nearly two years and as such the case was dismissed with costs.

Zu     Raj Bernard went to appeal against the dismissal order, the appeal court appointed 3rd auditor for taking account, incidentally I was also in Dubai during that period so I requested my lawyer to produce account from my side to the auditor, I also personally visited the office of the auditor but he did not entertain me saying he do not have time.

Zv     Since Aug 2002 I did not went to Dubai again.

Zw     The appeal was allowed and court directed me to pay Mr. Raj Bernard 1.1 Million Dhm. My lawyer could not produce counter account form my side.

Zx     As the audit done by the courts auditor was incorrect I directed my lawyer to file case against the auditor for submitting wrong account/audit.

Zy      My lawyer did not file the case nor did he return me the case papers so I could file a case personally.

Zz      There are many email correspondence between me and my lawyer.

Zaa    I did not pay the 1.1 million and went to appeal in Supreme Court, the appeal was dismissed.

 

 

7        I have already issued appropriate notices not only to the court appointed accountant who is also an culprit in the matter for not submitting the correct and unbiased report but also to my own legal advisor. I have also addressed appropriate communications to your previous local partner and I shall be marking a copy of the same to his new partner. It would be petitioners endeavour before the court of law to establish that the court -appointed accountant acted in a manner prejudicial to justice and he was negligent and prejudiced in his whole approach. The errors made be him in analysing the data are enormous. The petitioner submits that the accountant’s report is based on not only inadequate information but also incorrect information supplied by my lawyer. Legally, this is treated as perjury and contempt of court. Whatever may be the reasons for the accountant to give adverse report against the petitioner, the consequence of reopening of cases would have to be suffered by the respondents not only in terms of legal cases but also in terms of penal actions and punishments from courts of law. It is already on record that in criminal proceedings initiated by the petitioner, the respondents NO. 2 officer MR. Raj Bernard has admitted his liability before the court of law in Dubai, Sharjah and Ajman and he was making mainly two pleas viz. i) he needed time to settle, ii) he  wanted me to resort to civil remedy. The above two statements from him  are part of records and accountant’s report in any manner will not erase the past records. Maybe because the petitioner  was abroad and because of communication gap or maybe because of errors on the part of petitioners previous lawyer, a holistic picture was not available to the court of law. However, if  now the petitioner bring these facts on record and at the same time offer to deposit the amount, the chances of getting cases reopened are bright. The petitioner feels that he has good case on merits and in the interest of justice this curative petition or as the case may be the revision petition may be allowed and the matter may be remanded for further detail enquiry and investigation to the trial court.

8        The petitioner submits that Apart from  contradictory statements before different courts of law, records with regard to cheques given by Mr. Raj Bernard on behalf of respondent NO. 2 from time to time speak for themselves. It is apparent from the past record that MR. Raj Bernard  have not disclosed the entire gamut of transactions to the court. He  have indulged in exercise of intentional concealment of facts and therefore once the petitioner bring these facts on record, he  would be liable for additional perjury.

9        The petitioner wish  wish to bring on record that the issues relating to --- Bank if  being reopened. In fact the petitioner have realized that the issue was too serious and was not his  individual issue alone. It contains substancial question of law which if decided would benefit people in general. The petitioner  have issued notice to ---- Bank.  The draft of the notice was provided by top law firm in Mumbai who has advised the petitioner  that he  must file petition through their associates in London and in Dubai for withdrawal of licence of ===Bank for their unholy, biased, arbitrary, unethical role in banking.

10      The petitioner submits that  the fact that the whole world is today fighting war on terrorism and the role of banks in criminal activities and money laundering has been focus of not only USA but entire world supporting war on terrorism. The manner in which --- Bank acted was so unethical and records are so clear that the issue is bound to be reopened. The fact that these cheques were given by respondent NO. 2 is not disputed at all. The petitioner was not a customer of --- Bank at any point of time.

11      the petitioner further submits that he would also like to add that as per the Indian law, it is permissible for the petitioner to prosecute the respondents even in India since the offences committed by respondents were against an Indian and provisions of Indian Penal Code clearly provide that offences on foreign soil are also covered so long as they are between two Indians. But the petitioner feels that as he has prosper in dubai in his business he has full faith in Dubai courts, if justice is meted in Dubai many other people would reimpose their faith in UAE law and its courts. As the petitioner feels he is seen as an example of victim of  wrong justice system by his nationals in Dubai and if ultimately justice is done in the matter even they would repose faith in UAE judicial system.

12      The petitioner is making the above petition praying that the issue involved in the above matter be ordered to reopen. That pending the hearing and final dispute of the parties the Hon’ble court be pleased to direct the respondent to deposit the sum involved in the matter as and by way of security deposit as the respondents are foreigner and there is possibilities of flying the country and go beyond the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble court. The petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the appropriate sum of money in the Court as and by way of security as the courts pleased.

13      The petitioner has not filed any other petition or challenged the orders in any other court of law.

14      The delay in taking out this petition be condoned as the petitioner being held up in Australia for his Business purpose and presently residing in India, he could not due to legal knowledge file this petition earlier.

15      The petitioner is paying the court fees of DHR.___________ as fixed court fees.

16      The petitioner has no alternate and efficacious alternate remedy available and reliefs sought in the present petition will be suffice to do full and final justice between the parties.

17      The petitioner submits that there is substantial and crucial issues regarding law is involved in the above matter.

18      The petitioner craves leave to refer and rely upon the compilation of documents in support of this petition.

19      The petitioner therefore prays that-

 

a)       That after going through the legalities and proprieties in the above matte records and proceedings from the lower court be called for.

b)      That after going through the records and proceedings in the above matter and hearing the parties this Hon’ble court be pleased to remand the matter for fresh trail

c)       That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition this Hon’ble court be p

 

 

file1-to-5004

file1-to-5005

Document 2

 

files12004

Director of Bisco named Bernard Raj 15.03.1999 Public Prosecution

 

 

uk complaint number 5723 T

 

I am requesting again to the SCB – head office and Banking of Ombudsman to -  please re – open the case and give me justice.  I have lost a lot against the bank guarantee – and on having trust in the banks reputation. I have prepared this website in case if anything happens to me then SCB will be responsible for it

file1-to-5010

file3001

.

 

 

From January 19.01.2003st I am requesting the public prosecutor to reopen the case, but the prosecutor is not giving permission to reopen. Why?

 

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

 

 

 

 

file-14-17-1-ext011

 

 

Date: August 17, 2008

 

Mr. Ahmed Abdullah Mohammed Al Mullah,

PO Box 6651,

Dubai, UAE

 

 

Dear Mr. Al Mullah, 050 5766611

 

Re:      Matter related to Mr. Dayal Mansukhani – Besco International

 

Draft Letter- Al Mullah

Re:      Matter related to Mr. Dayal Mansukhani – Besco International

120months researched right report 15/8/98To15/8/2008

settlements OR JUSTIC HELP EXPOSING GENERAL PUBLIC THROUGH PRINT MEDIA, TV MEDIA AND OTHER MEDIA settle the matter.

ENGLAND BANK HAS BIG MONEY POWER – AND BIG RELATIONS.Mr David British citizen  has no respect for the UAE courts public prosecutor and Dubai crime laboratory, as well as their own officers signature with ID and bank rubber stamps with all these evidences clearly available – even if the bank does not certifies the check in this manner I DID NOT I SO I WENT TO DUBAI CENTRAL BANK AND ALSO TO THE INDIAN CONSULATE, IN DUBAI. BUT THEY ALSO COULD DO NOTHING TO HELP AN INDIAN IN DUBAI.I ALSO WEN TO LONDON FOR BANK OF OMBUDSMAN COULD NOT HELPJUSTICE NOTHING TO HELP AN INDIAN IN WORLD. I AM ATTACHING ALL THESE EVIDENCES.

THESE IMPORTANTS LINKS WITH EVIDENCE MAY BE HACKED OR CLOSED BY HACKERS OR BY GOVTS.

 

Almullah is the UAE local of this company from 1995 to 1997 july. He has got involved in this case illegal of standard chartered. Later he sold his shares to another local and the company changed and his checks were issued after that.

Standard chartered bank certified his checks, when Besco international had already closed down. The checks were issued only after he resigned. 14 years ago, and till date the payment has not been made.

There is no fault of Almullah in this case if we approach him in decent way and make him understand this case he will definitely do settlement.

If he incase does not will to do settlement and is looking forward for this case’s benefit then he will get involved in this faulty case because this will prove that he did all this deliberately and did not finish his banking powers even after the company had closed down.

If there is a good lawyer then he can take his power and file a criminal case on Standard chartered bank and Bernard Raj.

Reason to file a case will be why did bank issue bank certified checks when the accounts were closed, or there was no availability of cash and what guarantee did they take for issuing a good for payment instrument.

5.8.98 Standard chartered letterhead proves that banks staff has illegally certified these 2 checks.

According to banking rules after 1992, the banks were not allowed to issue such checks. The bank was only allowed to issue letter on the company letterhead to state any guarantees. If the bank has done so, then it is crime. Because they have in 1996 admitted in this letter, that they had certified these checks in 1996, to their clients.

 

In this same letter, if you will see this letter was issued on 1998 where they said that on 15th October the check was deposited in October 1998. how is this possible? Ths letter has enough of false information and points to prove that the bank has committed false actions.

Even after giving bank guarantee the opposite party has till date not paid the amount, and took loan against it.

Whoever can fight this case will get the fees to his choice.

If Almullah files this case against the bank the case cost I will offer, and this case will be fair and al mullah will get good reputation.

The other case to be filed on Raj Bernard. Why did he involve Almullah when his business / relation with Almullah after 1997 July was over?

Why did he issue almullah’s company check why did not he issue LLC checks. This complaint can be filed by me if not Almullah.

Third case, K K Bose, to release my checks and accounts, and certified documents and the case history. He has to get me the bank guarantee checks.

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

This file is proof  that BESCO is 100% local ALMULLAH.

7

Almullah The passport copy is attached. Almullah had given the power of attorney to Raj Bharnal Almullah’s signature is below.Almullah is working as a Dubai labour officer with a high designation.  He can approve as many labor visas as he want. He owns a man power recruitment company and supplies to different companies. Raj took loan for this company and he issued PDC cheques of this company. All of them were bounced, so Almullah is responsible.

6

please check Raj’s visa. He has a work visa. Not a business visa.

 

 

5

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

I am attaching the trade licence photo copy from 1995- 1997 july . Almullah is the owner and Raj is the manager.

 

file12-add002

 

This is the certificate of license issued by UAE government that BESCO is 100% local Almullah company ,

owner is  and he gave him power of attorney to Raj. So if any cheque is bounced then Almullah is responsible for it.

 

files12002

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

The below document is the copy of BESCO LLC chamber of commerce certificate.

files12003

files12005

file12-add001

 

 

 

files12011

This letter proves that Raj had given me PDC cheques worth more than 900,000 and stopped the

payment from the next month. Instead of receiving 900,000 I received 38,800 from Dubai drydocks.

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

 

 

files12009

 

Arabic translation of the above mentioned letter.

 

 

 

 

Notice A

Date:  26th July 2006

 

Standard Chartered Bank, Legal and Compliance, UK &Europe

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

Sub:  Complaint against your Dubai branch office about supporting and shielding criminal

activities against general public.

From:

Dayal Mansukhani

 

Ref#: 20060726105632GL5Z_GL5_49_0.dat) - Reply to your mail

 

The Managing Director, Standard Chartered Bank, Legal and Compliance, UK &Europe 22

Billiter Street London EC3M2RY Telephone +44(0)2072807477 Fax +44(0)2072807478

 

customer.feedback@hk.standardchartered.com

Dear Sirs,      Sub:  Complaint against your Dubai branch office about

supporting and shielding criminal activities against

general public.

 

I am an Indian businessman who was in Dubai for 25 years and then shifted to Australia for 4 years. I was in the activity of transport business, mechanical works etc and in the course of my business it was usual for me to accept cheques with bank guarantee on the cheque. In such cases it was a practice to mark the cheque as “Good for Payment”. I was not a customer of your bank. However I had dealing with your bank due to cheques received by me from your client. These cheques were dishonored; there were serious allegations of fraud and crime. There has already been some passage of time and it is likely that you may at the very beginning be inclined to treat this communication as an effort to re-open a closed matter.  However, please bear with me and read on this communication.

 

I am writing to you today after having realized that this was not a single or isolated instance. Thousands of innocent businessmen suffered losses running into millions of dollars due to a well planned crime by certain criminal elements acting in collision with the insiders in your bank. The top officials of your bank clearly understood the seriousness of the matter. However they wanted either to save their face or to protect their skin and hence they did not report the matter to you. The strength of your organization was misused by the top management in Dubai for thwarting justice. This was also against your policy of Corporate Governance. Secondly I have my serious doubts that these top officers were having prior knowledge of the crime and they were supporting the same. Maybe what I discovered is only the tip of the iceberg. I do not know whether these people had any role in money laundering or in channelising funds for terrorist activities.

 

As an Indian citizen I am duty bound to inform true facts to you, so that you can take steps even today to set your house in order. After the terrorist attack on World Trade Centre the entire world has adopted special laws to protect banking system from misuse. In the light of changed circumstances, I would like to state that the previous conduct of your Dubai branch should be looked into in a proper perspective. Dubai branch of your bank had deliberately and willfully indulged into the practice of issuance of fraudulent bank guarantees and collecting income other than through official channels. I was one of the victims of this practice. One of my own debtors namely one Mr. Raj Bernard submitted to me cheques which were marked “Good for Payment”. When I tried to encash these cheques in your Dubai branch, your Dubai branch did not make payments.

 

Please note that this was not the case of the fraud committed by only a third party. It was clearly admitted by your Dubai branch that your own officers had signed those cheques as “Good for Payment” I was further informed that the concerned officers had left the services of your bank and they were no more available in United Arab Emirates (UAE).

 

There were alterations in the cheques. These alterations were duly attested by your officers. A stand was taken by your Dubai branch that the signatures of the officers with regard to attesting of the alterations were not genuine signatures.  Thus your Dubai branch merely disputed the signatures on alterations. It did not dispute the signatures on the original guarantee. The matter was investigated by the police authorities in Dubai. Unfortunately I was fighting the case single-handedly. I did not have any legal assistance. Secondly I was not aware about the total volume of the fraud .It was only at a later date that I came know that hundreds of people were similarly cheated by your officers. The modus operandi was as follows:-

 

1)        Your officers used to dishonestly and fraudulently issue confirmations of “Good for Payment” without credit inquiries and  without there being a clear balance in their accounts. These officers might be doing so for their own benefits, but the fact remains that hundreds of such cheques marked as “Good for Payment” were making rounds in the market.  Innocent parties were accepting these cheques in good faith.

2)       The business community in Dubai was believing in such cheques and was lending funds against such cheques on the belief that on due date your bank would make payment.

3)       It appears that your officers were not deliberately keeping any internal records for these types of cheques, in other words market credit was used under the stamp and seal of your bank. However, legally there was no record with your bank.

4)       This was a dangerous situation. As and when the cheques were likely to be dishonored, it was bound to create havoc. This indeed happened when the cheques started bouncing.

5)       When the top officers came to know about the fraud it was necessary for them to immediately nab the culprits from your own bank and hand over them to the investigating officers in Dubai. By doing so they could have interrogated the guilty and found out the exact quantum of the fraud. Thereafter all victims could have been given compensation by claiming the same from the insurance company.

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E ’S LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/012,1246/99,1555/012?

I am aware of the fact that as per principals of Corporate Governance your bank is taking insurance policy to cover itself against a fraud. You have to complete certain formalities for this purpose such as filing a complaint with the police, cooperating with the police, setting right your internal systems etc. This should have been done by you in fairness and keeping in view your policy of corporate governance; however the top bosses in Dubai were hesitant to take such straight forward actions. This is because they might have feared disciplinary action against them. Either they were in collusion with the junior officers who had committed the fraud or they were negligent in not controlling the junior officers. I would not hesitate even in suspecting that the top officers might have very well shared the gains of such unethical practice adopted by the junior level officers. Then the cheques given to me bounced back with a reason “Refer to Drawer”, I was shocked.  This is because the cheques were drawn by your bank’s client and were marked “Good for Payment” by your own bank. Therefore there was no question of returning of the cheques with a reason “Refer to Drawer”, I took up the matter with drawer of the cheque as well as with your bank. Since it was not possible for me to simply accept the dishonored cheque when I had in the first place accepted the cheques only and only because your bank had given its guarantee that the cheque would be honored.

 

Then your officers came and personally discussed with me. They in fact admitted that there was something wrong within your bank and there appeared to be a fraud on the part of some of your own officers. I was advised to once again represent the cheques. Accordingly I represented the cheques but to my dismay the cheques were once again dishonored. At this juncture the bank came out with a new theory that there was alteration in the cheque. (This was a dishonest stand.  If at all there were alterations, the bank should have pointed this out in the first instance itself) The alteration was taken up with the police authorities. Then the police authorities started the investigations. I placed forward the following facts before them:

 

1)      The bank was not disputing its guarantee but was confining its allegation about forgery only in respect of the alterations made in the cheque.

2)      Throughout the investigations, the bank did not even whisper a word as to whether the account had sufficient balance on the date on which the guarantee (i.e. “Good for Payment” noting) was originally issued.   If the noting was issued at a time when there was no balance, this per se showed involvement and fraud on the part of the officers.

3)      The bank also did not whisper a word throughout the investigations as to whether the original noting/guarantee of “Good for Payment” was duly recorded in the bank’s internal records.  If this aspect was looked into, the fraud on the part of your junior officers would have come to light.   The investigations (both by police authorities as also by the internal authorities) were bound to be incomplete unless the above aspects were duly disclosed and looked into.

4)      There was also a need to check and investigate into the cheques that were previously honoured by the bank.   There was a clear likelihood that a number of cheques with the noting “Good for Payment” were presented to your bank and were honoured even though the cheque-passing official must have noticed at the time of passing the cheque that the “Good for Payment” noting is appearing without any internal records at the bank.  In other words, if the bank’s officers had passed cheques in past by overlooking the apparent irregularity, this aspect per se showed that there was an involvement of the local management.

5)      It was ridiculous for your Dubai Branch to take a stand that the cheques were originally issued with bank’s “Good for Payment” noting and were just lying with me.  It was undisputed that I was payee of the cheques.  In this situation, there was no reason for me as a businessman to withhold the cheques with me. When the cheques could have been very much encashed by me even previously there was no reason for me to withhold the cheques.

6)      I also made complaints with various other authorities including the Central Bank of the UAE. The Central Bank of the UAE informed me as per its letter dated 11th may 2000 that the entire matter center’s around with alterations in the dates on the cheques in question. The refusal of your bank to honour the claims was based on such alterations and I was further informed by Central Bank of the UAE that your bank is prepared to defend any court proceedings which may be brought against it. Therefore I was advised by the Central Bank of the UAE that I should take whatever action I deem fit to solve this issue. Thereafter I approached your bank from time to time and even lodged a complaint against your bank with the office of the banking ombudsmen. The matter was reviewed by your office and I was informed by a letter dated 8th September 2000 that your bank’s position had not changed from that setout in previous letter dated 28th July 1998. Thereafter my complaint was once again rejected. The office of banking ombudsmen in London took a stand on the basis of submissions made by your bank that my complaint related to banking activities in Dubai and has no relevance to banking services provide in the UK (United Kingdom). Accordingly my complaint was rejected on grounds of jurisdiction; I was left with no option of pursuing the matter in London. In this connection I was further informed by the office of the banking ombudsmen as per letter dated 02nd October 2000 that they would not deal with my complaint because my complaint related to a banking service in Dubai which is outside the United Kingdom.

 

CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES:

 

Prima facie it may appear that the present representation is belated. However you may appreciate that during this period I was not able to pursue my case on account of a number of circumstances beyond my control. Secondly there is also a change in circumstances during this period as explained herein below:

 

I was in Australia for 4 years between 2002 to 2006 and I returned to India recently, thereafter I consulted Legal firms as also certain NGO’s in India who assist non- resident Indians (NRI’s). For the first time I came to know that my grievance and my complaint is not an individual complaint but a complaint which is of a representative nature. Then I recalled my experience in the light of the advice received by me I learnt that the offence was much more serious than what I was thinking.

 

At this point of time, the relevance of the above referred aspects as per Sr. no. 1 to 6 above was brought to my notice by some of the other victims of the crime.

 

The bouncing of the cheques had not occurred only in my case. Hundred of cheques had bounced. Secondly in my case it was a straight forward transaction. In case of others there were more complications. Thirdly I could sustain the burden due to my good financial position as I was already a successful businessman. However a number of traders                     market in Dubai became bankrupt and they had to run away from Dubai. They had huge amount of sundry returns who had given them guarantee cheques from your bank. When these traders realized that the guarantee cheques were fake in the opinion of your bank they were shattered. Your bank disowned its responsibility and refused to pay, the individual traders had no other option but to either to declare bankruptcy or to simply leave the country. Hundreds of careers were shattered and hundreds of families were ruined.

 

If it was only relating to my case it could have been understood that it is a stray incident of fraud or offence. However how this could happen in hundreds of instances? It was evident that your officers had a role to play in the entire fraud. This generality of the fraud made it clear that the adversarial position taken by your bank was unjustified and was unbecoming of a banker. Your bank ought to have first investigated whether its officers had any role and thereafter taken steps to file a police complain against its own officers. This could have facilitated obtaining payment of insurance claims against fraud and to make payments to all the victims of the fraud. Instead your bank decided to deny the very truth about fraud at the cost of innocent victims of fraud who had believed your bank.

After a passage of time your bank might be under an impressions that the issues have become infructuous and hence nobody can take any measures against your bank. However with the recent campaign in the world against the use of banking channels particularly by criminals and terrorists groups, there is a ray of hope for a person like me to reopen this case and seek justice.

 

If your bank had taken this position in the past and is not willing to reverse the position even now, then your bank cannot be safe for general public today. If your bank had taken this position in U.A.E there is no reason why it cannot take such a position in India. Therefore unless your bank changes its stand and adopts a new position it would not be desirable for various countries to continue with the banking licenses given to your branches.

 

As you aware in countries like India, an individual incident is differentiated from a general phenomenon. In this particular instance there was a general phenomenon which affected the very basis of the existence of your bank as a sound financial institution. However, you deliberately pushed the matters below the carpet.

 

I am enclosing some of the vital documents by way of attachments.   If you go through the letter dated 5th August 1998 addressed by you to the police authorities, it would make clear to you as to how your branch officers were dishonestly and fraudulently acting. When the letter was issued in August, the bank was already aware about future dishonour in October!  This is ridiculous.  This shows that the bank was playing a game.    The real fact was as follows:

1. I had two cheques received from Mr. Raj Bernard.  One cheque was dated 15th July 1998 and the other cheque was a postdated cheque bearing the date 15th October 1998.

2. On the cheque dated 15th July 1998 there was no alteration at all.   It was also duly marked as “Good for Payment”

3. The cheque dated 15th October 1998 was bearing an alteration in date.  However, the alteration appeared to have been authenticated by your officers.  I had accepted this cheque in good faith. I was not aware of any fraud.

4. When I presented the first cheque dated 15th July, it was dishonoured with the reason “Refer to Drawer”.  I was shocked and I contacted the bank.   After telephonic discussion, the officers of the bank came to me and informed me that there is some internal fraud due to which a number of officers were shifted/terminated by the bank.  They also informed that they had terminated credit facility of a number of clients whom they suspected to be involved in the fraud alongwith the officers.  However, they agreed that I am entitled to encash the cheque. Accordingly, I presented the cheque again.  This time, the bank returned the same with the reason of  “Alteration”.

5. This left me with the only alternative to issue a legal notice to the bank as I was convinced that the bank was trying to refuse payment of a lawful obligation on some or the other pretext. When I issued a legal notice, the bank realized its mistake of taking the matter lightly.  The bank realized that I would not leave the matter in the middle.   If there was really an alteration, there was no reason for bank to keep quiet between 15th July to 18th July 1998.  The bank must have filed police complaint forthwith.  Bank did not do so.  Bank also did not file a police complaint on second presentation.  It is pertinent to note that only when I got a legal notice issued that the bank decided to file a police complaint. This was afterthought to cover up their lapses.

6.When the bank became aware of the difficulty that they would face on account of their officers’ misdeed, they first filed a police complaint thereafter based on the information that they had received about the cheque dated 15th October 1998, they tried to paint a dark picture of mine as if I was involved in the fraud. When the bank was in interaction with me, I myself had shown them the cheque dated 15th October 1998 in good faith.

7. Your officers then made a strategy to take advantage of the probable deficiency in the cheque dated 15th October.  They did not give me a hint and in fact did not object to the second presentment of the cheque. However, in their letter written to police authorities in August 1998, they make a mention of the cheque dated 15th October as if they were making a forecast of the future.  If they were going with clean hands, they should have narrated that they have found the cheque in my possession which they suspect to have been fraudulently made out with a guarantee. However, they did not aver so.  On the contrary, they mentioned that the cheque “was presented on 15th October 1998”.

6. As regards the cheque dated 15th July 1998, the bank did not allege of any fraud at the time of first dishonour.  They merely advised me to “Refer to Drawer”.  They did not allege any alteration.  They did not allege any fraud.  They in fact orally agreed that the cheque should be once again represented.  However, when I represented the same, they came out with the theory of forgery or alteration.   This they did only on the basis of the knowledge that they gained about the cheque dated 15th October 1998 and after they realized that I am going the legal route.

7.  Therefore it is crystal clear that whatever may be the position of cheque dated 15th October 1998, the previous cheque dated 15th July was very much a bonafide cheque.  Bank dishonoured the same wrongly and routinely as the bank was dishonouring a number of cheques in defiance of its obligations.  When I lodged police complaint and when the bank officials came to know that the deficiency in cheque dated 15th October could be utilized to tarnish my image, the bank decided to falsely claim that even the previous cheque dated 15th July was altered.

8. With this fraudulent objective, the bank brought out chemical alterations in the cheque and thereafter did not even return the cheque.

9. Dishonesty of the bank is clear from the fact that if at all the cheque dated 15th July was really a forgery the bank ought to have suo moto lodged a police complaint on first presentation of the cheque on 15th July 1998.  Why the bank did not do so? Why did the bank wait for two presentments and thereafter filed a complaint only on receiving my legal notice.

 

Sir, “Fraud” has two definitions.  One is internal fraud and another is fraud by a third party.  If there was an internal fraud, the bank could not dispute its liability.   E.g. someone buys traveler cheques and the bank officer had misappropriated the amount received from buyer of the cheque, this is an internal fraud.  If the buyer of the cheque delivers the cheque to a shop, the shop cannot be denied reimbursement.  My case falls under this category.  I had received the cheques in good faith.  I was not a party to the fraud.  If Mr. Raj Bernard had colluded with your officers, how I can be punished?

 

When the cheque dated 15th July was presented, the bank ought to have realized that there is no internal entry about the “Good for Payment” noting.  However as the signature was genuine, the bank had no defence.   However as the bank was confident of its power and empire, it still tried to return the cheque.  When I issued legal notice, the bank officers were angry.  In the meantime, the bank officers had knowledge about the cheque dated 15th October 1998 and the bank officers made a strategy to mix up various issues.

 

The Government examiner (i.e. Public Prosecution In-charge)  had initially held (In terms of his report no. 19/5412 dated 25th  April 1999)  that the cheque dated 15th October 1998 did not bear alteration.  However,  subsequently in my absence (i.e. when I was in Australia), your bank obtained a report dated 30th September 2003 on fresh examination of the cheques.  If you desire, I shall send this report to you.  This report mentions about alteration but is not sure about the same.

 

Thus there is some tampering with the cheque. However, who did this tampering is a matter of mystery.  In my clear view, your officers themselves had tampered with the cheque after 15th July 1998.  If the tampering took place before 15th July1998, your officers should have filed a complaint.

 

The bank first rejected the cheque on grounds of  “Refer to Drawer” and then on grounds of “alteration”.  When Government prosecution upheld my side and when I presented the cheque, it was returned on grounds of time-limitation.

 

Now in September 2003, the final report is still inconclusive.  In the civil case too , your bank did not take a fair stand and in fact adopted an adversarial stand

 

Every action of the bank was an afterthought as evident from the above.

 

Even now it is not late.   I hereby call upon you to take following actions:

 

  1. Call for all records of the case from your Dubai Branch.  If you desire, I shall provide you with all documents that are available with me.
  2. Check up the record of the officers that were shunted out during 1997-99
  3. Also check the accounts where the credit facilities were called off during this period
  4. Also verify the records of all police complaints as also all cheques that were marked “Good for Payment” and were bounced on presentation.  Check the same with reference to internal notings and correspondence of the Dubai Branch
  5. Upon getting satisfied about the bonafide of my complaint, please take suo moto legal action and also make reimbursement to me.
  6. You may also do some introspection and find out through your own sources as to how many businesses were destroyed during 1997-99 due to abrupt closure of facilities by you, what was the reason for such abrupt actions, how many other banks and innocent third parties were affected due to illegal return of cheques by you.

 

If you still fail to act in the matter, I shall take following measures against your bank:

 

  1. I shall file fresh civil/criminal cases
  2. I shall inform the regulating authority in U.K.
  3. I shall caution the regulating authorities all over the world where your bank has branches.
  4. I shall take up the matter with anti-terror organizations with specific demand to check up money-laundering and criminal nexus activities of your officers.
  5. I shall file petitions in every possible court (including Dubai, London and Mumbai) to cancel your banking license.
  6. I shall issue appeals and public advertisements to call for full information from General public in Dubai as to how many businessmen fled Dubai due to abrupt closure of facilities, how many businesses were shut down due to pressures from your bank, how the affairs of other banks were affected due to wrongful dishonours by your bank.

Sir, I have only one request.  I might have suffered some setbacks in legal battles due to my own shortcomings.  However, I was on right path.  Mere passage of time or mere delay would not exonerate your bank from the fact that a crime has taken place.  I have now presented a holistic picture to you.

 

Please look into the matter and take up the matter for a full-fledged investigation.  If your desire any additional details or co-operation from me, I am every ready for the same.

 

  1. Last but not the least- with the great support and enthusiasm instilled in me by the Human Rights’ activists in Mumbai, I have made up my mind and decided to return to Dubai. I am not scared about arrest or any other actions. After depositing the amount and coming with clean hands, it would be definitely expected from the judiciary in Dubai that I must be given a fair hearing. Now since I am out of Dubai and I am in my own country in India, there is no reason for me to place my money in jeopardy. Usually, people who abscond after committing a crime do not return. I am not only returning and facing the trial, but I am putting myself at stake by offering to deposit the amount. Thus my person and my finances will be put to stake just for justice and for removing the stigma on me. This gesture would per se convince the judiciary that I am innocent and I should be given justice. The Human Rights group from Mumbai (India) who have given me courage, would also be monitoring the whole case and one or two volunteer lawyers from this group would be accompanying me. One Mr.Sanjeev G.Punalekar, is a Human Rights activist and edits a newspaper named “Civil Liberties”. He has also fought various litigations against Government of India. You may find his name and details by searching internet through www.google.com. He was accompanying me and appearing for me even in Australia. His contact details are furnished here below.

Mr. Sanjeev G.Punalekar,  Advocate, High Court,  315, Birya House,  265, Perin Nariman Street,    Bazar Gate, Fort,   Mumbai – 400 001.(India).  Mobile no. – 0091-9820095814

 

Yours truly

 

Dayal Mansukhani

This letter confirms that Bank issued Bank guarantee in my favour, therefore I must get payment and this Bank Guarantee they prove the above mentioned.

 

 

 

بدون نعمة الله لا شيء ممكن ، وكما في الإمارات العربية المتحدة هي بلد مسلم نذهب بنعمة الله.
من ناحية الحكومة ، وهي وظيفة مهمة جدا من الذراع التنفيذية الإمارات السبع التي لها صلاحيات لاتخاذ قرارات مستقلة.
أعطاني القوة لتحقيق السلام بلدي لتحقيق الصالح العام للدولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة . يرجى زيارة موقع الويب الخاص بي لفهم مستوى عال من المشاريع الخيرية أنا التي ستعود بالنفع على كل من  في الإمارات
www.dayalmummedia.com
لماذا% 90 ٪ من الناس في هذا العالم ترى  أن غاندي  شبه الله وليس 100  وذلك لأن لأن غاندي لم يتصرف بشكل مستقل مما أسفر عن فوزه  أنا لست محامى غاندي   وجني مصباح علاء الدين السحري.أ وسوف تمكن الحكومات من زيادة عائداتها في فترة فى فترة قصيرة من الوقت حتى أن الجميع سيكون سعيدا وانه لن يكون هناك تقسيم وممارسة الحكم. وهذه الأمور تساعدنا في تحقيق رؤية غاندي لخلق نظام عالمي جديد يكرس السلام والصدق والمحبة والازدهار وبالتالي خلق الآلاف من غاندي ، وإنقاذ هذه الإمارات والعالم.
إذا كان حكام الإمارات السبع والتي لها صلاحيات لاتخاذ قرارات مستقلة. فإنها يمكن أن تعطي أمر إلزامي على كل بناء وانشاء جهاز الشهرة وسيتم تحديد سعر وسائل الاعلام من قبل مع الحكومة ليس أكثر من 2 إلى 3 فلس في الثانية الواحدة.
مصباح علاء الدين هو جودة المنتج و وسائل الإعلام التجارية ، مع تكلفة التصنيع 10-25000 درهم -- استثمار وقت واحد ، إذا كان الدخل من الإعلان يأتي الجهاز إلى الحد الأدنى من 1 إلى 3 تعبئة في الثانية الواحدة ،
فمن 1 درهم إلى
2,700  في الجهاز لمدة  ساعة. إذا استخدمت لمدة 15 ساعة في اليوم ، يصبح من 2,700درهم كحد أدنى لكل جهاز يوميا.   2,700 X 25 X 375 ٪ = دخل

 

Per day per Mum media day Dhs 2,700 X 1000000 = 270000000000 X 25% 675,000,000 (Six billions seventy five millions per day). Thus the expense of the Government per day will be converted to savings. We will set up Mum media in every building when the order is passed.

اذاكان عدد جميع المبانى والمنشأت التى تستخدم الجهاز تقدر بحوالى مليون وحده اى ما يعادل دخل سنوى بحوالى 675,000,000  درهم    حيث تقدر الوحدات والمنشأت كلأتى:
وعدد المطارات فى الامارات العربيه حوالى سبعة مطارات ، 77O للشقق الفندقية HOLIDAY 34562 ، مراكز التسوق 75. مجموع المباني الإقامة 66،6000 ، 245686 المباني التجارية في المجموع = 1000000 (تقريبا)
الإمارات العربية المتحدة والهيئات الحكومية مسؤولة أيضا عن رفاهية الأمة وسمعتها جيدة كذلك. لمساعدة وجعل "كل جميع المواد من الإمارات العربية المتحدة (سواء المحلية والوافدة) هو أفضل هدف لجميع موظفي القطاع العام. إذا كان يمكن القيام بذلك من خلال وسيلة من وسائل الإعلام المفهومه والمبتكرة التي تفيد كلا من الحكومة والسكان ككل بالتأكيد فإنه أمر يستحق النظر. إذا كان يمكن أن تجعل مليارات الدولارات لانقاذ الحكومة ونفس المبلغ من حساب الحكومة  إذا فإنه يمكن انعاش الاقتصاد وتحقق دبي 365 يوما فى نموا من الازدهار الاقتصادى  .

فى دولة الامارات العربية المتحدة يعيش حوالى أكثر من ثمانية ملايين شخص منهم العاملين والموظفين والمستثمريين الأجانب حيث جميع الفئات من الصناع والتجار ولهذا تجد كل شئ متاح مع وجود أكثر من منطقة حره فى الامارت ونحن أيضا نعيش فى دولة

الامارات العربية المتحدة منذ اكثر من اربعين عام فى سلام وأمن ولا يخفى على أحد ما يحدث فى بعض الدول العربية من  مظاهرات و ثورات والحياة الكريمة وبعض العائلات  التى شردت كل ذلك من أجل الحريه والعدالة

 

دايا منسوكهانى0507570737

letterhead_bottom_english.jpg

 

Aburuf Legal Translation

 

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

 

إلى صاحب السمو الشيخ محمد بن راشد آل مكتوم، دبي، أ.ع.م Dubai 0507570737

 

المستأنف : السجن المركزي رقم هوية 176031

 

I am Uneducated I Need real justice100% give me?

 

Checks www.dayalmummedia.com   7 Rulers partner per 7 Billions of dollars

 

Checks www.dayalmummedia.com UAE nationals 890,000 join with channel partner per month Dh25,000 to Dh50,000

 

المستأنف هو مستثمر برئ في السجن ويُريد محامياً مخلصاً يقاتل لتحقيق العدالة الحقيقية.

لقد قام هذا الشخص البرئ بتقديم 5 بلاغات في شرطة الرفاعة وذلك من السجن المركزي لأنه منذ عام 1998 تجري مساندة الجريمة ولم يتم سماعها، تبريرها حتى اليوم والشخص البرئ يوجد خلف القضبان والمجرمون ينعمون بالحرية.

إن مؤسسات قانونية تأخذ الرسوم من المستثمرين وتساند المجرم والجريمة وحتى هذه البلاغات قد تم تسجيلها من السجن لدى النائب العام ولكن حتى تاريخه لم يتم تقديم بلاغات لعدد ثلاثة محامين.

إن مبلغ مطالبة التأمين لأجل الخاص بي هو 1.4 مليون. لقد قام وكيل التأمين راج برنارد واس سي بي بتأمين الخسائر ضد الأزمات بدبي والآن فقد حان الوقت لتغطية خسائري التي يرفضون سدادها كما أن الأزمة المالية قد ضربت أرجاء العالم.

لقد تم إرسال إلتماس من المشتكي البرئ – في إدارة النيابة العامة – إلى حكام الإمارات السبعة والآن مضى شهر ولم أتلقى أية أخبار حتى تاريخة.

إستئنافي :

بمشيئة الله فإنني موجود في السجن كما أنني أرسل هذا الرسالة الإلهية إلى كافة حكام الإمارات السبعة.

لقد قمت بتصميم جهاز اف ايه ام ئى وهو مشروع فريد وتصور جديد بعون الله وهو جهاز مثل اللمبة السحرية الادين وخلال فترة زمنية قصيرة فإن هذا الجهاز السحري سيزيل كل البؤس من كافة دول منطقة وسيحرر الجميع من أوجه المعاناة التي وقعت على دول مجلس التعاون الخليجي في الفترات السابقة وهذا البنك السحري قد أراده الله لمساعدة الجميع في كسب المال خلال حياتهم دون أن يكون لديهم أي رأسمال وسيجعل هذا الجهاز كل شخص غنياً في العالم العربي وهو يمثل ثورة. وسيحقق العالم العربي رقماً متميزاً في سجل جينيس من خلال نمو الإقتصاد والنجاح الفاعل للفرد وللجميع. يرجى زيارة هذا الموقع لمزيد من التفاصيل www.dayalmummedia.com.

خلال 2000 عاماً الماضية حكم البريطانيين العالم وقام مقاتل الحرية الهندي المهاتما غاندي من خلال قيادة حملات على مستوى الأمة لتخفيف الفقر وتوسيع حقوق المرأة وبناء السلام الديني والعرقي وزيادة الإقتصاد إعتماداً على الذات وفوق كل شئ قام بتحرير الهند من حكم الراجا البريطانيين من خلال نبذ العنف. لقد إتجه غاندي إلى عدم ممارسة العنف والإعتماد على الحقيقة في كل الظروف.

 

وعلى نحوٍ مماثل لتفكير غاندي وبإرادة الله قمت بتصميم جهاز اف ايه ام ئى. وفي الحلم أمرني الله بالمساهمة بهذا الجهاز مع حكام الإمارات السبعة لأجل رفاهية العالم العربي. إن جهاز اف ايه ام ئى هو جهاز سيحقق ملايين الدولارات لإمارة دبي من السياح والمقيمين وسوف يكون إضافة إلى مجد دبي.

 

وبالمقابل فإنني ألتمس من سلطات دبي المختصة أن تمنحني العدالة. إنني برئ ومستثمر وقد عانيت الكثير منذ عام 1998. وبهذا المشروع الإبداعي فقد أردت جلب السلام والراحة في كافة أنحاء الإمارات. لقد عشت في دبي لمدة 34 عاماً تقريباً وهي مثل وطني وليس لدي سجل إجرامي طيلة حياتي. لقد إستثمرت كل مدخرات حياتي في هذا المشروع لأجل جلب الراحة والطمأنينة في الحياة اليومية للإنسان لأجل الحصول على الغذاء. إن هناك مهنيون متعلمون يحضرون إلى دبي بحثاً عن الوظيفة وهذا المشروع سيُلبي حاجة ملايين الباحثين عن العمل من ذوي تأشيرات العمل على أساس العمل بالتعاقد والعمل الجزئي وكذلك لأولئك الذين لا يستطيعون العمل لأسباب عديدة فإنه يمكنهم أيضاً العمل من منازلهم وهم مستريحون.

 

 

إنني أطلب منكم بتواضع إعادة فتح القضايا المذكورة أدناه والإطلاع على المظالم الناجمة عن الفساد في النظام. ولإزالة ذلك النوع من الممارسات الخاطئة فإنني - بكامل أهليتي – وبرغبتي الحقيقية أود من السلطات الحاكمة في جميع الإمارات السبعة ضبط الممارسات الخاطئة لأجل مصلحة دبي. إنني صادق وقوي وأرغب أن أكافح المظالم التي سببتها بعض البنوك وبعض المحامين ورجال أعمال من الذين إستخفوا بالنظام لشق طريقهم بوسائل غير مبررة.

وعليه ألتمس منحي الفرصة لإثبات نفسي وأرجو منكم إعادة فتح القضايا المذكورة أدناه فيما يتعلق ببنك إستاندرد تشارترد وراج اوف (بسكو إنترناشونال، بسكو انترناشونال ذ.م.م، وكيث إنترناشونال)، البنك التجاري الدولي ومؤسسات قانونية مثل دار العدالة، كلداري وشركائه ودار الحكمة.

 

 

إن قلبي يحترق بسبب المظالم التي عانيت منها منذ عام 1998، وقد كان لدي (2) من الأخوان عانوا وماتوا في 1998 – 1999 وبسبب كل هذه الأحكام غير المبررة وإنني عانيت من خسائر تجارية هائلة وكذلك خسائر عديدة كما تعرضت إلى صدمة نفسية.

إن المستثمرين الذين يحضرون إلى دبي يثقون في البنوك ولكن البنوك وبمساعدة الوكلاء تقوم بسرقة المستثمرين لإثبات أن دبي هي جهة غير عادلة  وبذا فإنهم يضرون بسلام وسمعة دبي.

 

في عام 2011 تم إدخالي إلى مستشفى راشد ومستشفى دبي 3 مرات وجميع التقارير الطبية متوفرة لدى المستشفيات المعنية.

لقد كنت في حالة صدمة ومنذ عام 1998 حاولت أن أبذل أفضل ما في وسعي للوصول إلى السلطات المعنية للإبلاغ عن كيف أن بعض الناس يمارسون العمل التجاري ويسببون الضرر لإسم دبي وهذه الأفعال يجب القضاء عليها والاهتمام بها لأجل مصلحة وسلام الناس وقد أرسلت أيضاً إشعار قانوني في عام 2006 و 2008 إلى راج برنارد، دار العدالة، هاريس للتدقيق، البنك المركزي الإماراتي وبنك إستاندرد تشارترد (المملكة المتحدة لندن) بشأن جميع المظالم التي عانيت منها.

 

 

 

 

إلتماسي

بلاغ ضد :

1-      كيه ال راج برنارد (راج) 903/557 مثبت بتقرير تدقيقي حيث أنه خلال غيابي خسر المحامي الخاص بي هذه القضية وعندما كنت موجوداً هنا مع تقرير التدقيق تم حكم عدد (2) قضية أعلاه لصالحي.

2-      قام بنك ستاندرد تشارترد بتقديم قضية زائفة ضدي برقم 1246/99.

3-      البنك التجاري الدولي 827/2000 سحب مبلغ 428 درهم إماراتي تقريباً باسم زوجتي التي لم يكن لها أبداً حق الإمتياز وبدون توقيع من زوجتي .

 

أرقام القضايا المراد إعادة فتحها

1-      1246 /99 (المرجع – مفتوحة حتى مستوى المحكمة العليا) و 658/2001 المرجع – مفتوحة ويرجى منح  حكم (بنك ستاندرد تشارترد قضيتان وتم أخذ المبلغ مني ووضعوني في  معضلة. 658/2001 تم رفض هذه القضية بدون حكم (بنك إستاندرد تشارترد له علاقة).

2-      557/98 (دايال – وين) راج ضد دايال – حكم برفض القضية لصالح دايال.

183/2000 – حكم لصالحي (إعادة فتح هاتين القضيتين)

 

ملحوظة : 454/2002 والمحكمة العليا 4787/2002 تم إجازة الطلب خلال شهرين والآن أنا موجود في السجن، وبعد إرسال تقرير التدقيق الخاص بي الذي كان موجوداً أصلاً لدى المحكمة الأقل فإنه لم يتم تقديمه في المحكمة سواء بواسطة مجموعة هاريس أو كيه.كيه.بوث لدار العدالة للإستشارات القانونية. لقد تم إرسال تقرير التدقيق الخاص بي إلى المحكمة قبل 8 أشهر قبل أن يكون لدى المحكمة الأقل كما تم إعطاء وتقديم جميع السجلات خلال  الفترة من 1995 إلى 1998 إلى المحكمة الأقل في دبي.

3-      إن القضية المدنية رقم 183/2000 قد أودت بحياة إخواني الإثنين وقام المحامي الخاص بي برفع قضية بمبلغ 10 مليون إلى محكمة دبي طالباً 618.388 درهم إماراتي لصالحي وهذه القضية غير مرتبطة بأي من القضايا أعلاه. لماذا تم رفضها؟ يُرجى إعادة فتح جميع هذه القضايا لأجل العدالة.

 

مستنداتي

1-      أ. تقرير تدقيق الربيعي من 1995 – 1998 جميع الصفقات متضمنة في تقرير التدقيق هذا.

ب. هاريس للتدقيق والمحاسبة بتاريخ 17/2/2002.

ج. إتفاقية رسوم دار العدالة (تقريباً مليون كرسوم مسددة إلى السيد كيه.كيه.بوث) وكان يعمل مع كلداري عندما سلمت القضية له كما تم سداد رسوم إلى كلداري أيضاً قبل 2001 وكذلك مبلغ 50,000 درهم إلى دار الحكمة (العام الماضي).

2- بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م بخطاب مروس بتاريخ 20/10/97 بقائمة سداد من 12 قسط بواسطة الأحواض الجافة (من ترايخ 15/1/98 أوقفت الأحواض الجافة أقساطي.

3-بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م خطاب مروس بتفاصيل الشيكات (دليل جنائي( (شيك ضمان أول مُلغى ولم يتم إعطائي أو إخباري مطلقاً عن ذلك).

 

My Petition:  Complaint against:

1.       K L Raj Bernard ( RAJ ) 903 / 557 proved with my audit report in my absence my lawyer lost this case when I was here with my Audit report I got the 2 above cases in my favor.

2.       Standard Chartered Bank ( SCB ) filing false case against me case no. 1246/99.

3.       CBI ( 827/2000 withdrawal of an FD amount Dhs 428,000 approx. in name of my wife’s which was never under lien, and with no signature of my wife)

Case nos. to re-open:

  1. 1246/99 (RE-open till the Supreme Court) & 658/2001 re-open and please give me judgment (SCB two cases money is taken from me and they have put me in dilemma658/2001 this case was dismissed w/o judgment (SCB involved).
  2. 557/98 (Dayal-win) Raj VS Dayal- case dismissed Judgment in favor of Dayal.                                       183/2000 –Judgment in my favor ( re-open these 2 cases )

Note: 454/2002 and Supreme Court 4787/2002, within two months order passed and I am in jail today, even after submitting my audit report which was already present in the Lower court was not produced in the court either by Harris Group or K. K. Bose of Dar Al Adallah legal consultants. My audit report was submitted in the court 8 months before in the Lower court. All record from 1995 to 1998 was given and produced in the Lower court of Dubai.

  1. Civil case no. 183/2000 took my 2 brothers lives. My lawyer filed a case for 10millions Dubai court ordered Dhs 618,388 in my favor. This case was not linked to any of the above cases. Why was it dismissed? Please Re-open all these cases for sake of Justice.

my exhibits:

1   a. al Rubbaie Audit report from 1995 – 1998 all deals listed in this audit report

B. haris auditing & accounting dated 17.2.2002

c. dar al adallah fee agreement (approx. one million fees paid to mr. K. K. bose) he was working with galadhari when i handed over the case to him, paid fees to galadhari too before 2001 and Dhs 50,000 to dar al hekma (last year)

2   besco international llc. letterhead 20.10.97 payment list of 12 installment via drydocks( from 15.1.98 dry-docks stopped my installments)

3   besco international llc. letterhead details of cheques ( criminal evidence) ( first Guarantee check  is cancelled  i was never given and was informed about it, then)

 

4-      دائرة محاكم دبي، شيك صادر لصالح دايال "بنك دبي الوطني" بمبلغ 223,796 درهم إماراتي.

5-      بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م، خطاب مروس بتاريخ 20/1/1998 وقد استلم راج قسطاً من دايال للتأمين لأجل لتغطية أضرار الخليج  بمبلغ 1,408,124 درهم إماراتي.

6-      بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م خطاب مروس مؤرخ.

7-      عدد (2) شيكات ضمان من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد صادرة بواسطة راج برنارد ومضمونة بواسطة موظفي بنك إستاندرد تشارترد مع مذكرة رد.

8-      نسخة من الحكم بتاريخ 29/9/2011.

9-      تقارير طبية من المستشفى برقم هوية 7611331 من مستشفى دبي، إجراء عملية، المستشفى الهندي والاسترالي (تم إرفاق التقارير).

10-        في الجلسة السماعية الأولى  طلبت القضية برقم أمر 557/98.

 

الجزء ب : بنك ستاندرد تشارترد

 

 

11-           بخطاب مروس من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتاريخ 5/8/98 يؤكد إصدار عدد (2) شيكات ضمان بنكية لصالحي.

12-           إلى النيابة العامة بشرطة الرفاعة – بتاريخ 25/4/99 مرجع الخطاب رقم 19/5412 وهذا الخطاب يؤكد البلاغ الجنائي لبنك إستاندرد تشارترد باسم دايال وأن الشيك قد خضع لتعديل قانوني بواسطة عدد (2)  موظف من بند إستاندرد تشارترد وراج.

13-        من قيادة شرطة دبي إلى شرطة الرفاعة بتاريخ 10/1/99.

14-        بنك الإمارات المركزي.

15-        محكمة العدالة (رقم القضية 658/2001.

16-        خطاب من بنك المشرق بتاريخ 17/10/98 إلى دايال.

17-        خطاب بنك المشرق (إخطار شرطة الرفاعة بحجز جواز سفري بسبب الشيك رقم 404976 (وهذا البلاغ لم يتم تقديمه بواسطة أي شخص. وكذلك تم تقديم خطاب بتاريخ 5/8/98 من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد إلى الرفاعة لرفع قضية لإدراج قضية لم تحدث في أو قبل 5/8/98 وتم مساندته بكافة السلطات الحاكمة بدبي مما دمر حياتي كلها ومنذ تاريخه وحتى الآن لم يتم تحقيق العدالة).

 

دليل إضافي :

1-      شهادة وفاة الأخوين.

2-      نسخة مكبرة للشيك بتاريخ 1998.

3-      نسخة من الرخصة التجارية لشركة  بسكو إنترناشونال مع الكفيل المحلي الملا.

 

 

4   Dubai court’s dept. check issued in favor of Dayal of “the national bank of Dubai” for an amount of Dhs 223,796.

5   besco international llc. letterhead 20.1.98 raj received premium from Dayal FOR TERM-insurance to COVER GULF damages an amount of Dhs 1,408,124.

6   besco intl. llc. letterhead dated.

7   two scb bank guarantee cheques issued by raj bernard and guaranteed by two scb officers, with return memo’s.

8   Judgment copy dated 29.9.2011

9   medical reports Hospital id no. 7611331 FROM Dubai hospital, bypass-operation- India and australian hospital (INSERTED stent).

10     in first hearing i requested for order case no. 557/98.

 

part b: scb.

11     in the letterhead of standard chartered bank dated 5.8.98 CONFIRMS 2 bank guarantee checks issued in my favor

12     rafaa to police public prosecution – dated 25.4.99 letter ref. no. 19/5412. this letter confirms scb criminal complaint on Dayal’s name and the cheque had legal alteration – by scb’s two officers and raj

13     Dubai police head quarter to rafaa police dated 10.1.99

14     central bank of uae

15     government of justice ( case no. 658/2001)

16     mashreq bank letter dated 17.10.98 to Dayal.

17     mashreq bank letter ( rafaa police notification for custody of my passport for chq. no. 404976. (THIS complaint was never filed by anyone instead note the letter dated 5.8.98 of scb to rafaa to file a case for an event that did not take place on or before 5.8.98 and was supported by all Dubai governing authorities that ruined my whole life. since that day until today justice is not given)

extra EVIDENCE:

  1. 2 brothers death certificate
  2. enlarged copy of the cheque showing 1998
  3. besco intl. trade license copy with local sponsor al mullah

 

4-      المحامي الخاص بالخليج للمحاماة والإستشارات القانونية – ملحوظة مهمة : لم أقم بتقديم اية قضية بشأن الشيك رقم 404977 وهذا فقط إشعار من المحامين الخاصين بي.

5-      الحكم بتاريخ 29/9/2011 .

 

ملحوظة : ذكر موظف بنك إستاندرد تشارترد أنه منذ عام 1992 فإن القوانين المصرفية قد تغيرت وبدلاً عن إصدار الشيك تقوم البنوك بإعطاء ضمان على ورق الترويسة فكيف قام بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بإصدار هذه الشيكات؟ كيف إستطاع راج الحصول على عدد (2) شيكات ضمان مصرفية من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد؟ لماذا قام عدد (2) موظفي من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بإعطاء ذلك الضمان؟ هل هذا تآمر من راج برنارد وعدد (2) موظفي بنك إستاندرد تشارترد؟؟.

 

الجزء أ – راج برنارد / بسكو إنترناشونال/بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م /كيث إنترناشونال :

 

 

1-         مستند رقم 2 : يذكر خطاب الترويسة لراج برنارد عدد 12 قسط يتم سدادها إلى دايال مانسوخاني بواسطة الأحواض الجافة بدبي وإذا لم يقم بالسداد فإنه سيدفع 10% من نصيب الأرباح. ومن 1998 وحتى اليوم لم يقم بسداد الفائدة أو نصيب الأرباح.

2-         المستند رقم 3 : خطاب الترويسة لشركة بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م بتاريخ 19/1/98، رسالة فاكس، تم إدراج 15 شيك بمبلغ إجمالي 1,500.000 تقريباً وجميعها إرتدت وحتى تاريخه لم يتم سدادها وهذا يُثبت بأنه مجرم وحتى شيكات بنك إستاندرد تشارترد لم يتم سدادها وهذا الدليل يُثبت أيضأً بأنه قد أعطاني شيك في عام 1998.

 

3-         مستند رقم 5 :  خطاب مروس لشركة بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م مكتوب وموقع بواسطة المحاسب هاري ويعترف راج بدفعات مالية قدرها 1,408.124 درهم إمارتي من دايال تم إستلامها خلال فترة 9 أشهر من تاريخ 1 مارس 1997 إلى 20 يناير 1998. ولتحصيل التأمين لأجل ضد تغطية الخسائر إن وجدت في دول منطقة الخليج العربي خلال 15 عاماً فإنني قد شعرت بالخوف من الأزمة المالية بسبب الحرب في عام 1999 بين الكويت والعراق عندما كنا أجانب عانينا الخسائر وكنا خائفين من سوء الظن غير المعروف. لقد كنت استثمر بشكل أساسي في المعاملات التجارية مع الشركات في البحرين و\لأحواض الجافة بدبي الخ ولهذا فقد قمت بتغطية هذا التأمين مثل راج الذي كان وكيلاُ كما تم إخباري  بأن الشريك المحلي لبنك إستاندرد تشارترد وشركة بسكو المحلية هما نفس الشئ  وأنه قد تم إصدار 3 شيكات ضمان مصرفي وعدد 12 شيك مؤجل إلى راج وهذا جعلني أعتقد بأن الأمر حقيقي. لقد كانت خطط بنك إستاندرد تشارترد وراج هو أن تفقد دولة الإمارات العربية السمعة. إن بسكو إنترناشونال خلال الفترة من 1997 وحتى تاريخ وجودها وفي حالة فحصها في سجلات العمل فإنه يمكن معرفة عدد التأشيرات التي تم إصدارها وبسبب عدم سداد مرتبات العاملين فِإن الشركة قد أفلست وعانى عاملوها بشدة.

 

ملحوظة :

1-         إن راج برنارد المديرالعام لشركة بسكو إنترناشونال خلال الفترة 1995 – يوليو 1997 كان وقتها موظف محترم لدى الملا ومواطن بإمارة عجمان وهذه الشركة تغيرت إلى بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م في يوليو 1997 وبعد أغسطس 1997 لم يقم راج بإصدار شيكات باسم الشركة السابقة ولكنه في يناير عام 1998 قام بإصدار 14 شيك وغش شركة عجمان المحلية وقد إرتدت جميع تلك الشيكات.

2-         قام بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بالتصديق على شيكين وكان الملا حينها الشريك المحلي لبنك إستاندرد تشارترد عندما أعطاني راج تلك الشيكات المتعلقة ببنك إستاندرد تشارترد. لماذا وكيف حصل على هذه الشيكات المصدقة؟ (مطلوب إجراء تحقيق).

المستند رقم 1 : يوضح تقرير مدققي الربيعي بتاريخ 21/4/98 جميع سجلات دفعاتي المالية من 1995 إلى 1998 وكانت هذه تعاملات تجارية مع بسكو إنترناشونال وقد قام راج برفع قضية خطأ ضد دايال برقم 903/98 يطالب فيها بأنه كان يستلم فائدة وهذه  القضية أثبتت بأنني كنت أقوم بتمويل الشركة وكان يقوم

  1. my lawyer al – khaleej advocates & legal consultant – important note: i had not filed any case for chq. no. 404977 just my lawyers notice
  2. Judgement dated 29.9.2011

Note: a scb officer even SAID; since 1992 the banking LAWS HAD changed instead of issuance of a cheque banks were to give guarantee on letterhead then, how did SCB issue these cheques? how did raj manage to get two bank guarantee cheques from scb? why did scb 2 officers do give such guarantee? plotting of raj bernard and two scb officers??

part A – Raj bernard / besco International / besco international llc / keith international:

  1. Exhibit No. 2. Raj Bernard letterhead mentions 12 installments to be made to Dayal Mansukhani through Dubai dry-docks.  If he doesn’t pay he will pay 10% of profit share. From 1998 till today he has not paid the interest nor profit share.
  2. Exhibit no. 3. Besco international LLc. letterhead dated 19.1.98, fax message, 15 checks were listed total amt. 15 lacs approx. all bounced and till date unpaid which proves he is a criminal. Even SCB checks not paid and this evidence also proves he gave me check in 1998.
  3. Exhibit No. 5. Besco intl. Llc. letterhead written and signed by accountant Hari and Raj admits payments of Dhs. 1,408,124 from Dayal received in a period of 9 months from 1st March 1997 to 20th January 1998. For collection of term-insurance against coverage for losses if any in GCC countries in 15 years. I feared financial crisis because of the war in 1990 between Kuwait and Iraq when we expatriates suffered losses and were afraid of such unknown misfortune. I was investing substantially in business dealings with companies in Bahrain and Dubai dry-docks etc. so I had covered this insurance as Raj who was an agent, and even told me SCB’s local partner and his Besco local were  the same. And that he had issued raj the 3 Bank guarantee checks and 12 PDC’s so this made me believe it was true. SCB and Raj’s plans were to make UAE lose the reputation. Besco intl. from 1997 until the date of its existence if checked in Labor records will show how many visas were issued and due to non-payment of salaries it went bankrupt and its laborers suffered greatly.

*** Note:

1.      Raj Bernard GM of Besco international 1995 – 1997 July. Local was then Al Mullah a respected labor officer, and citizen of Ajman. This company changed to Besco international LLc. in July 1997. After august 1997 raj should not had issued cheque’s of previous company, but in 1998 Jan. he has issued 14 chq’s and cheated the Ajman local. And all those cheques bounced.

2.       SCB bank certified two chq’s. Al Mullah was then the Local partner of SCB, when Raj gave me those cheques of SCB. Why and how he got these certified chq’s ? ( investigation required )

  1. Exhibit no. 1A. Al Rubbaie Auditors report dated 21.4.98 shows all my payment records from 1995 to 1998 these were business dealings with Besco intl. Raj filed wrong case against Dayal – 903/98 claiming he was

4-         بسداد حصة أرباح وتم رفض هذه القضية بواسطة النائب العام.

الأدلة الجنائية المتعلقة براج برنارد :

1-         المستند رقم 4 – أصدرت محكمة دبي مبلغ 223,796 درهم إماراتي بتاريخ 17/6/98 بشيك بنك دبي الوطني لصالحي مقابل القضية الجنائية، وفيما يتعلق بالشيكات الثلاثة المرتدة من حبيب بانك وهذا السداد كان مقابل عدد 14 شيكات مؤجلة مدرجة وصادرة بواسطة راج. لقد رفعت قضية جنائية ضد راج وحصلت على السداد مقابل عدد 3 شيكات من محكمة دبي.

1-أ  لقد تم إعطاء بعض الشيكات بعجمان وبعضها بالشارقة ولذا فقد رفعت قضايا جنائية على التوالي وكان راج محكوماً بالسجن لمدة 10 أيام وفيما بعد قام محاميه بذكاء بتحويله إلى دبي. لقد أدلى بالتأكيد والإعتراف في محاكم عجمان والشارقة بما يفيد أنه يجب عليه أن يُسدد لي.

1-ب المستند رقم 10: لقد قام برفع قضية زائفة ضدي بتاريخ 12/ 1998 قضية رقم 557/98 بمبلغ 1.4 مليون درهم إماراتي وفي جلسة السماع الأولى قمت بإرسال تقرير التدقيق الخاص بي الذي تم إعداده قبل 8 أشهر تقريباً من رفع القضية. لقد طلبت من محكمة دبي أمراً كما طلب راج وقتاً لإرسال تقرير تدقيقه وفي خلال مدة ثلاثة سنوات تم تعيين عدد 2 مدققين وكلاهما طلب مني أن أرسل تقرير التدقيق الخاص بي وهذا ما فعلته (كانت التعاملات بالنقد والشيك).

 

ملاحظة : بالنسبة للمدقق الأول حاول راج إغرائه ولكنه لم ينجح وهذا المدقق كان قد إطلع على المشكلة كما أن هذا المدقق قد تم حكمه بالسجن حيث عانى من ذبحة قلبية وتم ترحيله فيما بعد أما المدقق الثاني فلم يستطع إثبات خطأ التدقيق الخاص بي ولم يقم راج بإرسال التدقيق وبعد 3 سنوات وفي عام 2002 تم رفض القضية وتم إصدار أمر إلى راج بسداد التكلفة القانونية.

وفيما بعد وفي عام 2002 كان يتوجب علي أن اغادر إلى استراليا وقمت بتسليم القضايا المتعلقة بي إلى كيه.كيه.بوث المحامي الهندي بدار العدالة وتم إرسال جميع الوثائق الأصلية إلى السيد بوث (مستند رقم 1ج).

في تاريخ 17/2/2002 تم تعيين محاسبي  مجموعة هاريس. وبرفقة السيد مندوب دار العدالة ذهبت إلى شركة التدقيق ومرفق الخطاب الوارد من المدقق (مستند رقم 1ب).

 

ملاحظة : إن أية قضية تبدأ من المحاكم الأقل وتتجه إلى الإستئناف في محاكم الإستئناف تكون مسئولية مزدوجة  بشأن مراجعة القضية مع المراسلات الجديدة والمراسلات القديمة لأنه أمر منتعلق بالحقائق والأرقام ويجب أن تكون العدالة منصفة. ولكن في هذه القضية لم تتحقق العدالة.

 

2-         أعطت المحكمة الأقل راج فترة 3 سنوات كما تم الحكم على مدقق واحد بالإبعاد فضلاً على أن السجل الجنائي بمدة 3 سنوات المتلق براج كان أيضاً موجوداً في هذا الملف ولم يتم ملاحظة شئ لأن تقرير التدقيق الجديد لمدقق هاريس أوضح للمحكمة الموقرة بأن تقرير دايال لم يتم إرساله عندما كان تدقيقي موجوداً أصلاً في المحكمة الأقل وقد إستغرق الأمر ثلاثة سنوات للمحكمة الأقل لرفض هذه القضية (المستند رقم 1-ب).

إستطاع راج إثبات أن عدالة المحكمة الأقل كانت خاطئة في محكمة الإستئناف فقط في جلسة سماع واحدة وقد أصدرت محكمة الإستئناف حكماً لصالح مجرم بينما إستغرق الأمر 3 سنوات بالمحكمة الأقل لتجيز أمراً. إن محكمة الإستئناف وفي جلسة سماع واحدة أصدرت حكماً لصالح راج، كيف؟ لماذا؟.

 

ملاحظة : قضية المحكمة العليا برقم 4787/2002

taking interest. This case proved I was financing the company and he was paying profit-share. This case was dismissed by Public Prosecutor.

Raj Bernard’s criminal evidences:

1.       Exhibit no. 4- Dubai court issued Dhs 223,796 on 17.6.98 a check of National Bk. Of Dubai, in my favor against criminal case, for three Habib bank bounced check. This payment was against those 14 listed PDC’s issued by Raj). I had filed criminal case against Raj and got the payment against 3checks from the Dubai court.

1a.   Some cheque’s were given in Ajman, some in Sharjah so I filed criminal cases respectively. Raj was sentenced for 10days jail later his lawyer very smartly got them transferred to Dubai. He has confirmed and admitted in Ajman and Sharjah courts that he has to pay me.

1b. Exhibit no. 10 he filed a false case against me dated 12/98, case no. 557/98 for an amount of Dhs 1.4 million, in the first hearing I submitted my audit report which was prepared about 8 months before the case was filed. I requested Dubai court for an Order, Raj asked for time to be given for submitting his audit report. In a period of 3 years two auditors were appointed. Both asked me to submit my audit report which I did. (The deals were in cash and cheque).

Note: first auditor Raj tried to entice him but did not succeed, this auditor went through problem. This auditor was sentenced to jail where he suffered a heart attack and later was deported. Second auditor couldn’t prove my audit wrong, and Raj had not submitted the audit. After 3 years in 2002 the case got dismissed and Raj was ordered to pay the legal cost.

Later in 2002, I had to leave for Australia. I handed over my cases to K. K. Bose Indian lawyer of Dar Al Adallah. All originals were submitted to Mr. Bose. * (Exhibit no. 1C)

On 17.2.2002 Harris Group Accountants was appointed. With Mr. Felix of Dar Al Adallah’s representative I went to the audit firm. The letter from the auditor attached (Exhibit no. 1B).

Note: Any case that begins from Lower courts, and goes for appeal in the Appeal courts it’s the DOUBLE responsibility to review the case with the new submissions and the old submission, as it’s a matter of facts and figures and JUSTICE MUST BE FAIR.

But in this case it did not happen.

2.       Lower court gave Raj 3 years time; one auditor was even sentenced deportation. Raj’s three years criminal record was also present in this file. All was unobserved as Haris Auditor’s new audit report showed the Honorable court Dayal’s Audit was not submitted when my audit was already PRESENT in the Lower court, and it took 3 years for Lower court to dismiss this case. ( Exhibit no. 1B )

Raj could prove the justice of the Lower court wrong in the Appeal court in just One Hearing and Appeal court gave judgment in favor of a criminal, while it took three years for Lower court to pass an Order, Appeal court in one hearing gave judgment in Raj’s favor, how? Why?

Note: Supreme Court case no. 4787/2002

3-         هذه هي المحكمة النهائية ولذا فإنني أعتقد بأنها موطن العدالة.

 

يمكن أن يتسبب أي ظلم في الموت في بعض الحالات للشحص البرئ وفي بعض الأحوال فإنه يمكن أن يدمر حياة الإنسان بأكملها وهذا حدث معي فحتى اليوم لم أحظى بالعدالة في محاكم دبي الموقرة كما أنني لا أستطيع الخروج من المظالم التي عانيتها بسبب الطرف غير العادلة لبعض الناس الذين يتلاعبون بالقانون. إن خطأً صغيراً من قاضي المحكمة العليا الموقر يمكن أن يحول حياة البرئ وأسرته إلى مأساة. إنه يُعتبر صوتاً للعدالة ولذا فإن مسئوليته بالغة الضخامة.

 

ومرةً أُخرى فإن الحكم غير العادل قد تم إصداره كما تم مساندة الجريمة حتى النهاية (المحكمة العليا).

 

وفي عام 2002 تم إجازة أمر فقد أرسلت تعليمات إلى دار العدالة لرفع قضية جنائية ضد مدقق هاريس لإعلانها في المحكمة العليا ولم يقم دايال بإرسال التدقيقات الحسابية على الرغم من أن التدقيقات كانت موجودة أصلاً لدى محاكم دبي الموقرة. لقد تم قلب القضية رأساً على عقب لصالح مجرم بسبب مجموعة هاريس وإهمال المحامي الخاص بي أو التآمر وارتكاب الحنث بالقسم حيث أن المعنيين/المؤسسات قد كانت تحت القسم. لقد ذكر المحامي الخاص بي أنه قد حصل على اعتراض شفوي (بيان المحامي الخاص بي في البريد الإلكتروني) خمسون الفاً لرفع قضية على هاريس للتدقيق وكنت سعيداً بسداد حتى مائة الف ولكنه رفض رفع القضية فحسبما أعتقد أنه قد إنضم إلى راج برنارد ومجموعة هاريس وتآمر لقلب القضية. ملاحظة : لم أكن موجوداً في دبي منذ فبراير 2002.

(في الملف رقم 20 توجد كافة رسائل البريد الإلكترونية بين المحامي الخاص بي وبيني)

 

4-      في يوم 29/9/2011 قام القاضي الموقر أحمد العلي بإصدار حكم ظالم مفاده سداد 500 الف درهم إمارتي الآن وبعد ذلك 500 الف درهم إماراتي أُخرى خلال شهر. من يستطيع هكذا مبلغ في هذه الأزمة في شهر واحد؟؟.

 

مستند رقم 8

في يوم 25/8/2011 أصدر القاضي الموقر طارق أبوعمة أمراً بإيداع 30,000 درهم إماراتي وإيداع عدد (2) جواز سفر لأجل الكفالة وقد تم رفض ذلك بتاريخ 21/9/2011. مستند رقم 5 (دليل إضافي).

 

ملاحظة : إنني موجود أصلاً في السجن وهذه قضية عمرها 10 سنوات وهي قضية غير أخلاقية. ومع ذلك فإنني كنت أسدد مبالغ صغيرة مع خوض معركتي. لقد عُدت من أستراليا قبل 3 سنوات. إنني لست كالآخرين الذين يهربون من دبي ولا يعودون أبداً بعد سرقة البنوك باستخدام تسهيلات إئتمان مفرطة أو الحصول على قروض الخ أو حتى البعض من خلال التسبب في خسائر للأعمال التجارية الصغيرة والكبيرة من خلال حالات إرتداد الشيكات أو بعض السلوكيات غير الأخلاقية.

 

ولكن راج برنارد، بنك إستاندرد تشارترد، محاكم دبي والقضاة الموقرين جميعهم يريدون أن يضغطوا ويقتلوا مريضا بالقلب عمره 63 عاماً في حالة ألم مستمر.

 

(المستند رقم 9 رقم الهوية بالمستشفى 7611331) إن تقرير القلب لأطباء مستشفى راشد  يوضح أنه بسبب الاجهاد فإنني أعاني من آلام القلب وعلى الرغم من جراحتي السابقة وجراحة إصلاح الأوعية التي هي في وضعٍ جيد ولكن هناك إنسدادات متعددة في قلبي في الأوعية الضيقة التي تُسبب لي آلام القلب باستمرار وعليه فلابد أن أرى طبيبي في الهند الذي قام بإجراء عملية القلب وهذا ما أخبرني به طبيبان من مستشفى راشد. إنه لم يكن لدي قط أي سجل إجرامي خلال 34 عاماً من حياتي في دبي. لقد كنت دائماً ملتزماً ولم أحصل على أي قروض أو تسهيلات إئتمانية من أية بنوك أو أي شخص حيث عشت حياة محترمة بفضل الله.

(رقم الهوية بالمستشفى 7611331)

إنني أطلب بتواضع من رئيس الدائرة الموقر أن يسمح لي بإثبات براءتي.

إنني هنا وكذلك بنك إستاندرد تشارترد وراج برنارد.

3.       This is the final court, and so I believe it is God’s house.

Any injustice can cause death in some cases to the innocent; in some it can ruin a man’s entire life.  And this happened with me. Till today I am not given justice in Honorable Dubai courts nor can I come out of the grievances suffered due to the unjust ways of some people playing with Law.  A little mistake by The Honorable Judge of the Respected Supreme Court can make life miserable of the innocent and his family.  He is considered God and so his duty is of immense responsibility.

But again an unjustified judgment was given and crime was supported till the end. (Supreme Court)

In 2002 an order was passed. I sent instructions to Dar Al Adallah to file criminal case against the Harris Auditor for declaring in the Supreme Court, Dayal did not submit the Audits. Even though the Audits were already presented in the Honorable Dubai courts, the case got over-turned in favor of a criminal, due to Harris group and my lawyer’s carelessness or conspiracy and thus committing contempt of perjury as both concerns/firms are under OATH. My lawyer said he took verbal objection ( my lawyers statement in emails) asked for fifty thousands to file case on Harris auditing, I was happy to pay even a hundred thousand but he denied filing as I believe he may have joined with Raj Bernard and Harris group and conspired to get the case overturned. Note: I was not in Dubai since February 2002.

(In file 20 all emails between my lawyer and me, are present)

 

4.    On 29.9.2011 Honorable Judge Ahmed Al Ali gave an unjust order. Pay Dhs 500 thousands now and another 500 thousands within a month. Who can pay such an amount in this crisis in one month?? Exhibit no. 8.

On 25.8.2011 Honorable Judge Tariq Aboo Emma ordered to deposit Dhs 30,000 and deposit two passports for bail. This order was refused on 21.9.2011. Exhibit no. 5 ( extra evidences )

 

Note: I am already in Jail, this is a 10year old case and is an immoral case, yet I was paying small amounts and fighting my battle. I even returned from Australia last 3 years back, not like others who flee from Dubai and never return after robbing banks by using excessive credit facilities or taking loans etc, or even some by causing losses to small and big businesses in check bouncing cases or some unethical mannerisms.

But Raj Bernard, SCB, Dubai courts and Honorable Judges all want to stress and kill a heart patient who is 63 old and in constant pain.

( Exhibit no. 9. Hospital ID no. 7611331) Rashid hospital doctors Angio report will show due to stress I suffer heart pains. Even though my previous By-pass surgery and Stenting ( Angioplasty ) are in good shape but there are multiple blockades in my heart in narrow vessels for which I suffer heart pains constantly and so I must see my Doctor in India who had done the By-pass this was told by the two Doctors of Rashid hospital. I have never had any criminal record in 34 years of my Dubai life. I have always been a lightening bank myself I have never taken any loans nor credit facilities etc. from any banks nor any one and have lived a respected life, by Grace of God. (Hospital ID no. 7611331)

I humbly pledge the Honorable Head of the Department to allow me to prove myself.

I am here and so are SCB and Raj Bernard.

ملاحظة مهمة للغاية : لقد كان راج برنارد هو الشخص المسدد ولديه توقيعه على واجهة وخلفية الشيك كما أن عدد 2 موظفين من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد قد قاموا أيضاً بتوقيع وختم الشيك. إنني هنا أتسآل لماذا يقوم المستفيد (دايال) بتعديل التاريخ على هذا الشيك إذا كان لصالحي؟ وفي حالة أنه كان هناك أي تعديل فإنه تم من أحد الثلاثة أشخاص أعلاه.

 

عندما وصلت قضية تعديل الشيك هذه للمحكمة، جميع المحاكم (أقل، إستئناف، عليا) فقد أصدرت حكمها ضدي وتغريمي 2,000 درهم إماراتي "يرجى التذكر بأن الشيك كان لصالحي".

 

لقد حاولت الوصول إلى مكتب الحاكم، البنك المركزي في لندن (بنك امبوتسمان) وبنك دبي المركزي لإتاحة سماع قضيتي مجدداً ولكنني لم أنجح في الوصول إليهم. لماذا؟ هل لا توجد عدالة بدبي؟

 

جزء ب – بنك إستاندرد تشارترد :

الجانب الآخر للقضية : كيف أنني عانيت الكثير فقط من أجل ضمان بنكي بقيمة 300,000 درهم إماراتي

1246/99 هذه القضية تؤكد الظلم في دبي في دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة

 

1-      مستند رقم 10 : خطاب الترويسة لبنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتاريخ 5/8/98 إلى مركز شرطة الرفاعة يؤكد شيكين مُصدقين  بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي ومبلغ 200,000 درهم إماراتي صادران بواسطة بسكو إنترناشونال (راج).

2-      المستند رقم 2 : خطاب الترويسة لشركة بسكو إنترناشونال ذ.م.م بتاريخ 20/1/98 يؤكد عدد (2) شيكات ضمان وعدد (12) شيكات مؤجلة إضافية من حبيب بانك مع كافة أرقام الشيكات والتواريخ وهي شيكات صالحة للسداد صادرة إلى شخصي وموقعة بواسطة بسكو وعدد 2 موظفين من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد.

(هنا يوجد شيك واحد مشطوب لأنه لم يتم إعطاؤه لي)

 

3-            مستند رقم 11 : خطاب النائب العام بتاريخ 25/4/99 بمرجع رقم 19/5412 لصالح دايال ويؤكد على الشيك رقم 404976.

1-      بنك إستاندرد تشارترد – بلاغ جنائي مسجل باسم دايال.

2-      تم تعديل الشيك من ناحية قانونية كما أن تواقيع الطرفين راج  والموظفين الإثنين موجودة مما يعني أن التعديل قانوني.

4-            المستند رقم 7 أ : شيك ضمان بنك إستاندرد تشارترد 404977 بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي بتاريخ 15/7/98 ومذكرة رد بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتاريخ 16/7/98 والتي توضح الرجوع إلى الساحب (جريمة مصرفية مؤكدة) لاحظ أنه لسبب واحد يتم الرجوع إلى الساحب.

5-            مستند رقم 7 ب : شيك ضمان بنك إستاندرد تشارترد برقم 404976 ومبلغ 200,000 درهم إماراتي بتاريخ 15/10/98 ومذكرة الرد بتاريخ 29/4/99 التي توضح – تجاوزه الزمن (جريمة مصرفية ثانية مؤكدة).

 

ملحوظة : جريمتان

1-            في تاريخ 17/10/98 تم رفع قضية جنائية ضدي (بلاغ مزيف تم رفعه بواسطة بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بعد السداد لي).

2-            قام بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتأخير هذا الشيك لمدة 7 أشهر وبمجرد إستلامي للشيك قمت بإرساله للسداد ولكن حتى تاريخه لم أستلم أية دفعة مالية مقابل هذا الشيك الصالح للسداد.

(ملاحظة : تم إصدار توقيف في مركز شرطة الرفاعة بسبب  تبديد الوقت وتضليل المحكمة الموقرة على الرغم من أن المحكمة قد أكدت بأنه تعديل قانوني ولا زال بنك إستاندرد تشارترد لا يحترم قرار المحكمة).

*** Very Important Note: Raj Bernard, was the payer, has his sign in the front and back of the check. The 2 SCB officers have also signed and stamped the check. I am asking here, why would the beneficiary (Dayal) alter the date of this check if it was in my favor? If there was any alteration, it was from one of the above 3 persons.

When this case of altering the check went to court, all the courts (Lower, Appeal, and Supreme), passed their judgment against me and I was given a penalty of Dhs. 2,000.  *Keep in mind, the check was in my favor.

I tried to reach the Rulers office, Central bank in London (Ombudsman bank) and Dubai Central bank to have my case re-heard but I was unsuccessful in reaching them. Why? Is there no justice in Dubai?

Part B - Standard Chartered Bank (SCB):

Second side of the case:  how much I have gone through for only Dhs 300,000 bank guarantee.

1246/99 this case confirms injustice in Dubai UAE.

  1. Exhibit no. 10. SCB letterhead dated 5.8.98 to Rafaa Police station confirming Dhs 100,000 and Dhs 200,000 two certified cheques issued by Besco International ( RAJ ).
  2. Exhibit no. 2. Besco international LLc letterhead dated 20.1.98 confirming 2 bank guarantee cheques and 12 more pdc’s of Habib Bank with all cheque nos. and dates, Good for payment cheques issued to me signed by Besco and SCB 2 officers.

*(here one cheque is scratched out – because it was not given to me)

  1. Exhibit no. 11. Public Prosecutor letter dated 25.4.99 reference no. 19/5412 in favor of Dayal confirms chq no. 404976

1.       SCB – criminal complaint registered in Dayal’s name

2.       Cheque is legally altered and both parties Raj and the two officer’s signs are available. Which means alteration is legal.

  1. Exhibit no. 7a. SCB guarantee cheque no. 404977 of Dhs 100,000 dated 15.7.98  SCB return Memo dated 16.7.98 shows – refer to drawer (bank crime confirmed) Only reason refer to drawer NOTE.
  2. Exhibit no. 7b. SCB guarantees cheque no. 404976 of Dhs 200,000 dated 15.10.98 return memo dated 29.4.99 shows – Out of date. ( bank’s second crime confirmed)

Note: two crimes

1.  On 17.10.98 filed a criminal case on me (false complaint was filed by SCB to not pay me)

2.  SCB delayed this chq. For 7 months and as soon as I got the cheque I sent for clearing but till date I did not receive any payment against this Good for payment cheque.

(Note: It was blocked in the Rafaa police station, to use time and misguide the honorable court even when the court confirmed it was a legal alteration, still SCB did not respect the court Order.)

 

6-      مستند رقم 15: خطاب شرطة الرفاعة بتاريخ 17/10/98 المرسل إلى دايال مانسوخاني برقم مرجع 32/98 بواسطة بنك المشرق.

يؤكد : تسجيل البلاغ

  هذا الخطاب يتضمن بيان شرطة الرفاعة بتاريخ 17/10/98 وحتى 25/4/99 ولمدة سبعة أشهر بأن أحد الموظفين من طرفي وجواز سفري محجوزان لدى الشرطة فضلاً عن خسائري التجارية  وإخواني الإثنين اللذان فقدا حياتهما بسبب الإجهاد والألم. مستند رقم 16.

في هذا الخطاب فإن بنك إستاندرد تشارترد يفرج عن الشيك بتاريخ 25/4/99 وهو شيك برقم 404976، رقم مرجع النائب العام 19/5412 وتم إيقاف الشيك بواسطة مركز الشرطة لمدة سبعة أشهر.

 

7-         مستند رقم 12 : خطاب القيادة العامة لشرطة دبي الصادر إلى مركز الرفاعة بتاريخ 9/1/99 ورقم مرجع 219/1/17/9 والذي يذكر بأن الشيك رقم 404977 بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي حيث يقول مختبر الجريمة بالقيادة بأن التاريخ هو 1996.

ملاحظة : هذا الشيك إذا تم تقديمه لأي شخص  في العالم فإنه سيقول بأن العام هو 1998. وقام بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتاريخ 16/8/1998 بالتأكيد في مذكرة الرد على الرجوع إلى الساحب. حيث تم إرجاع الشيك ليس بسبب تعديل التاريخ.

 

6- مستند رقم 13 سلطات دبي – بنك دبي المركزي وخطاب محكمة دبي، مستند  رقم 14 قضية رقم 658/2001 ومعلومات شيك ضمان البنك وخطاب البنك المركزي بتاريخ 20/4/2003 برقم مرجع 30-7/546/2003.

يؤكد بأن (9) أشخاص/لإدارات متورطة وأن عدد 2 شيكات ضمان بنكية بمبلغ 300,000 درهم إماراتي فقط ولآكثر من 12 عاماً لم يتم سدادها مقابل هذا الضمان البنكي وهذا يؤكد أيضاً بأن بنك إستاندرد تشارترد نافذ ويمكنه إرتكاب جريمة وقد تم رفض ذلك في جلسة السماع الأولى لهذه القضية برقم 658/2001.

ومن خلال الثقة في البنك فقد قمت بتمويل راج والآن أنا في السجن ومجرمان طليقان حران في دبي.

مستند رقم 10 إثبات مستحيل معتمد بواسطة دبي ، أ.ع.م

1-         خطاب بنك إستاندرد تشارترد إلى مركز الرفاعة بتاريخ 5/8/98 (الفقرة 4) يؤكد بأن دايال أودع الشيك رقم 404976 بمبلغ 200,000 درهم إماراتي في البنك للسداد بتاريخ 15/10/98 (لايمكن لأي شخص أن يثبت بأن شهر أكتوبر 98 يأتي قبل شهر أغسطس 98) يرجى ملاحظة هذا بدقة.

Ø   ولكن يُثبت بنك ستاندرد تشارترد في خطاب بتاريخ 5/8/98، فقرة 4 بأن شهر أغسطس 1998 يأتي قبل شهر أكتوبر 1998 وفقط فإن بنك إستاندرد تشارترد النافذ يمكنه تقديم بلاغ في 5 أغسطس 98 إلى شرطة الرفاعة بشأن شيك مؤرخ في 10 أكتوبر 1998؟

هل هذا بسبب القوة أو المال؟؟

Ø   يذكر خطاب الترويسة لبنك إستاندرد تشارترد بأنهم أعطوا ضمان بنكي في 1996. فلماذا ومن يستطيع الإنتظار لمدة سنتين بعدم تجصيل المبلغ. وليس المبلغ بمبلغ صغير ولأجل شيكين؟

ملاحظة : أكدت النيابة العامة في 25/4/99 بأن الشيك رقم 404976 وبرقم مرجع 19/5412 بأن هذا الشيك معدل بشكل قانوني وهذا هو شيك مرقم متسلسل برقم 404977 مع وجود توقيع عدد 2 موظف وختم على الشيك المعدل وبالرغم من أن مذكرة الرد بتاريخ 16/8/1998 توضح مسألة الرجوع إلى الساحب وخطاب الترويسة لشركة بسكو الدولية بتاريخ 20/1/98 فإن هذا يؤكد في مجمله بأن السشيكات صادرة في عام 1998.

2-   إن نفس الخطاب بتاريخ 5/8/98 شيك رقم 404977 بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي فإن هذا الشيك لم يتم ذكره في خطاب بنك إستاندرد تشارترد إذن لماذا يقوم مركز شرطة الرفاعة أوالمدعي العام بإرسال هذا الشيك إلى مختبر الجريمة؟ من الذي اشتكى بخصوص هذا الشيك؟ أين مذكرة الشكوى ؟

 

6.          Exhibit no. 15 Rafaa police letter dated 17.10.98 given to Dayal Mansukhani ref. no. 32/98 by Mashreq bk

Confirms: complain registered

6a. in this letter Rafaa Police – statement 17.10.98 till 25.4.99 for 7 months one of my staff and my passport was in custody of police and my business losses and my 2 brothers lost their lives due to stress, and trauma.Exhibit no. 16

6b. in this letter SCB releases the cheque on 25.4.99 cheque no. 404976 Public Prosecutor ref. no. 19/5412 chq blocked by Police station for 7 months.

7         Exhibit no. 12 Dubai General Police Head Quarter letter issued to Rafaa dated 9.1.99 ref. no. 219/1/17/9 says chq no. 404977 amount Dhs 100,000 head quarter’s crime lab says the date is 1996.

Note: This chq if shown to anyone in the world would say it is 1998. SCB on 16/8/98 confirms in the return memo – refer to drawer. It was returned not for date alteration.

  1. Exhibit no. 13 Authorities of Dubai – Central Bank of Dubai and Dubai Court letter,  Exhibit no. 14 case no. 658/2001 and bank guarantee cheque information and Central bank letter dated 20.4.2003 letter ref. no. 30-7/546/2003

Confirms 9 persons / departments are involved. 2 bank guarantee checks for an amount of only Dhs 300,000 for over 12 years not paid against this bank guarantee, this also confirms SCB is Powerful and can commit crime. In the first hearing this case 658/2001 was dismissed.

With trust in bank, I financed Raj and today I am in jail, and two criminals in Dubai, free.

*Exhibit no. 10: impossible evidence approved by Dubai, UAE

1.       SCB Letter to Rafaa dated 5.8.98 (Para 4) confirms that Dayal Deposited the cheque no.  404976 amount Dhs 200,000 in the bank for clearing on 15.10.98.  ( No one can prove October 98 comes before August 98) Please note this properly

Ø  But SCB proves in a letter dated 5.8.98, Para. 4.  That August 1998 comes before October 1998 Only powerful SCB can file a complaint on 5th August 98 to Rafaa Police for a cheque dated 10th October 1998? With Power or Money??

Ø  SCB letterhead says they gave bank guarantee in 1996. Why and who would wait for 2 years to not collect money. It was not a small amount and for 2 cheques?

Note: Public prosecution has confirmed on 25.4.99 Chq. No. 404976 ref. no. 19/5412 this cheque is legally altered. These are serial numbered cheque no. 404977 and two officers’ sign and stamp are present on the altered cheque. Even the return memo dated 16.8.98 shows refer to drawer and the Besco intl. letterhead dated 20.1.98 all confirms cheques were issued in 1998.

2.       The same letter dated 5.8.98 Cheque no. 404977 amounting Dhs 100,000, this cheque is not mentioned in the letter of SCB, then why did Rafaa Police or Public Prosecutor send this cheque to Crime Laboratory? Who complained about this cheque? Where is the complaint notice?

3-   نفس الخطاب يتضمن الفقرة رقم 5 والفقرة رقم 7 فأين الفقرة رقم 6 ؟ لماذا هي مفقودة ؟

4-   لا تذكر الفقرة 7 رصيد في حساب بسكو انترناشونال وهذا يعني بأن بسكو انترناشونال، راج وعدد 2 من موظفين بنك إستاندرد تشارترد يجب التحري معهم؟ كيف أن راج وبنك إستاندرد تشارترد إستطاعوا إرتكاب هذه الجريمة ؟

5-   إن الفقرة 3 و 4 من الخطاب بتاريخ 5/8/98 تذكر بأن الشيك رقم 404976 بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي و 200,000 درهم إماراتي ان دايال أرسل الشيك للسداد وهذا الخطاب صادر من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتاريخ 5/8/1998 وقد كان تاريخ إستحقاق هذا الشيك هو 15/10/98.

*** كيف يكون هناك سبعون يوماً قبل تاريخ الإستحقاق ويقوم بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بتقديم بلاغ عن شئ لم يحدث ؟؟؟

*** كيف يستطيع بنك إستاندرد تشارترد تقديم بلاغ وبعد ذلك تقوم كافة الدوائر الحكومية تالمعنية بمتابعة العملية من غير أن تلاخظ ذلك ؟ لماذا لم يتم الإستماع لي ؟ أيضاً فإن بنك إستاندرد تشارترد يذكر بأن عدد 2 موظفين قد صادقوا على الشيك وأن هوؤلاء الموظفين الإثنين قد تركوا البنك أو تم نقلهم فمهما كانت الحالة فهل كان بنك إستاندرد تشارترد لا زال مسئولاً عن تنفيذ هذا السداد. إنني لم أقم أبداً بفتح أي حساب لدى بنك إستاندرد تشارترد في كل أنحاء العالم .. إذا فلماذا يقوموا بإصدار ضمان بنكي بإسمي وبالتأكيد فقد كان لديهم مبلغ ضمان من بسكو.

 

6-   تثبت الفقرة الخامسة بأن بسكو لم يكن لديها مبالغ في حسابها ومع ذلك تم إصدار الشيك لفائدة راج وهذا يعني أن راج وعدد 2 من موظفي بنك إستاندرد تشارترد كانوا متورطين.

7-   في القضية رقم 1246/99 فقد تم إصدار غرامة بمبلغ 2000 درهم إماراتي على دايال (1).

8-   إن الأمر المثبوت هنا هو أن تاريخ 1996 قد تم تعديله  إلى تاريخ 1998 ولكن يتضمن هذا التعديل توقيعاً وختماً من عدد 2 موظفين من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد وفي الواجهة يوجد توقيع راج أيضاً من هو الذي يجب معاقبته ؟ من الذي إرتكب التزوير؟

*** إن عدد 2 موظفي بنك إستاندرد تشارترد. وراج من بسكو كلهم قد تآمروا ضدي في مجمل هذا الفعل وبوعيهم الكامل إذن فلماذا لم تتم معاقبتهم ؟

قضية المحكمة الأقل برقم 1246/99، قضية محكمة الإستئناف رقم 1174/99 ، قضية المحكمة العليا برقم 145/99.

*** لم يتم إلغاء الغرامة على دايال وكل التوقيعات موجودة بواسطة موظفي البنك على شيك ضمان البنك على الرغم من أن الشيك قد خضع لتعديل فإن القضاة الموقرين لجميع المحاكم الثلاثة أعطوا أمراً غير مبرر.

1-      قضية رقم 658/2001 دايال ضد بنك إستاندرد تشارترد.

تم رفضها في جلسة السماع الأولى وعندما كان الشيك الأصلي للبنك في المحكمة وكذلك الخطاب المؤرخ في 5/8/98 الذي ذكر مبلغ شيكات بمبلغ 100,000 درهم إماراتي و 200,000 درهم إمارتي كانت لصالح دايال ومن الناحية المدنية فقد كان يجب أن أستلم المبلغ ولكن لم أستلم مبلغ 300,000 درهم إماراتي حتى تاريخه، فهل قمت باستلامه. وبسبب مبلغ 300,000 درهم إماراتي فإن محكمة دبي الموقرة والأطراف قد خاطروا بسمعة دبي.

2-      قضية رقم 1247/2003

تم تسجيلها مجدداً وسداد الرسوم أيضاً ولكن المدعي العام لم يسجل هذه القضية فلماذا ؟

*** يجب عقاب المجرمين ولكن أولئك الذين ساعدوا على الجريمة يجب أن يعاقبوا بصرامة.

 

بعض المذكرات إلى المحامي الخاص بي الذي قد يرغب في الدفاع عن القضية فقط لأجل الحقيقة والعدالة

 

1-   بتاريخ 16/7/98 شيك رقم 404977 – إرجع إلى الساحب (مذكرة رد)

3.       Same letter has Para 5 and then Para 7 where is Para 6? Why is it missing?

4.       Para 7 reads No Balance in Besco Intl. account. This means Besco intl. Raj and SCB 2 officers should be interrogated? How did Raj and SCB manage to do this crime?

5.       Para 3 & 4 of letter dated 5.8.98 mentions chq. No. 404976 amounting Dhs. 100,000 & 200,000 Dayal sent cheque for clearing... This letter was issued by SCB on 5.8.98. The due date of this chq. was 15.10.98.

*** How did seventy days before the due date SCB file a complaint of something that had not happened???

*** How can scb file a complaint and then later all the following Concerning Governing departments have followed the process unobserved? Why was I unheard? SCB also says 2 officers have certified the chq and that the 2 officers have left or been transferred, whatever the case was SCB was still responsible to make this payment. I had never opened any account with SCB in the whole world.. Why they issued a bank guarantee in my name, definitely they had a guarantee amount from Besco.

6.       5th Para proves Besco did not have funds in his account and yet the chq was issued in raj’s interest which means both Raj and SCB 2 officers were involved.

7.       1246 / 99 – Dayal ( I ) was given penalty of Dhs 2000.

What is proved here the date 1996 was changed to 1998, but this alteration had signature and stamp of the 2 SCB officers and at the front raj’s sign too, then who must be punished? Who did the fraud?

*** The two SCB officers and Raj of Besco all conspired against me, the entire act, in their full-awareness. Why they were not punished?

Lower court case no. 1246/99, Appeal court case no. 1174/99 Supreme Court case no. 145/99

*** The fine was not cancelled on Dayal. All the signs were present, by the bank officers on the Bank Guarantee cheque even though the cheque had alteration, still all the three courts Honorable Judge gave unjustified Order.

1.       Case no. 658/2001 Dayal vs SCB

In the first hearing was dismissed, when banks Original cheque’ was in the court and the letter dated 5.8.98 mentions Dhs 100,000 & Dhs 200,000 cheques were in favor of Dayal. In civil I should have received the payment but no payment of Dhs 300,000 till date, did I receive. Only for Dhs 300,000 the Honorable Dubai court and the parties staked the reputation of Dubai.

2.       Case no. 1247/2003

Was registered again and fees paid, too. But Public Prosecutor dint register this case, why?

*** Criminals must be punished but those helping crime must be punished severely.

Some Notes for my Lawyer who may wish to fight the case for only: Truth and Justice

1.      16.7.98 chq. No. 404977 –  Refer to Drawer ( Return Memo)

1-   بتاريخ 15/10/98 شيك رقم 404976 – تجاوزه الزمن (مذكرة رد)

2-   المدعي العام خطاب بتاريخ 25/4/99، مرجع رقم 19/5412

3-   خطاب قيادة شرطة دبي إلى مركز شرطة الرفاعة بتاريخ 9/1/99 برقم مرجع 1419/09/22 الذي يؤكد أن التاريخ قد تم تعديله من 1996 إلى 1998.

 

ملاحظة : تم إضافة كلا التاريخين بواسطة راج (بسكو انترناشونال) كما أن توقيعا الموظفان موجودين وفي حالة أن كانت هناك جريمة فإن الثلاثة أشخاص أعلاه هم المتورطون في هذه الجريمة.لماذا يتم إصدار أمر لي بسداد غرامة قدرها 2000 ؟ لماذا عانيت ولماذا أعاني حتى تاريخه أن أثبت الممارسات الخاطئة التي إتبعها بعض المجرمين.

فقط لأجل مبلغ  ثلاثمائة الف يقوم راج بتأثير من بنك إستاندرد تشارترد بالمخاطرة بسمعة دبي ؟

 

الجزء ج : قضية البنك التجاري العالمي برقم 827/2001

مستند رقم 1 : خطاب ترويسة البنك التجاري العالمي بتاريخ 20/10/2000 (إن الوديعة الأجنبية لزوجتي بوجا بمبلغ 180,432.48 دولار أمريكي ليست تحت الحجز).

مستند رقم 2 : إشعار مدين من البنك التجاري الدولي بتاريخ 5/4/2001 : المبلغ 428,454.41 درهم إماراتي.

المستند رقم 3 : إيصال إستلام وديعة بإسم زوجتي فقط.

قام البنك بخصم الوديعة الأجنبية لزوجتي بمبلغ 428,454.41 درهم إماراتي ( 180,432.48 دولار أمريكي) تقريباً. والتي لم تكن تحت الحجز ومن دون توقيع بوجا زوجتي فقد تم سحب هذه الوديعة فكيف تم ذلك ؟؟ إنني تقدمت لسلطات بنك دبي المركزي لأجل العدالة ولكنني فشلت مجدداً.

لماذا نواجه العديد من المظالم في إمارة دبي؟ من الذي سيوقف هذا فمن دون توقيع زوجتي تم خصم هذا المبلغ بواسطة البنك وهذه مؤسسة وليس هناك شخص يُبرر تلك الاهانات.

 

أريــد العدالــة UAE gave me?********

2.       15.10.98 chq. No. 404976 – Out of Date ( Return Memo)

3.       Public Prosecutor 25.4.99 letter, ref. no. 19/5412

4.       Dubai police head quarter letter to Rafaa Police 9.1.99 ref. no. 1419/09/22 confirming date was changed from 1996 to 1998.

Note: both the dates were added by Raj ( Besco Intl.) and the two officers signs are present. If there was a crime then it was the above 3 persons who were involved in this crime. Why was I ordered to pay a fine of Dhs. 2000? Why was and why am I till date suffering and trying to prove the malpractices followed by few criminals.

Just for three hundred thousand, Raj with combined influence of SCB risked Dubai’s reputation?

Part C : CBI case no. 827/2001

Exhibit no. 1: Dated 20.10.2000 CBI letterhead (my wife Pooja’s FD not Under Lien US $ 180,432.48)

Exhibit no. 2: Dated 05.04.2001 CBI Debit Advice: Dhs 428,454.41

Exhibit no. 3: Deposit receipt in name of my wife, only.

Bank debited my wife’s FD of an amount Dhs 428,454.41 i.e. US $ 180,432.48 approx. which was not Under Lien, and without my wife Pooja’s signature this deposit was withdrawn how?? I reported to Central Bank of Dubai Authorities for justice, but once again I failed.

 

Why are we facing so many injustices in Dubai? Who will stop this, without my wife’s signature this amount was debited by a bank; an institution and there is no one to justify such offenses.

 

 

Dubai King Dom Criminal Free .investor Jail

How many Law breaker help Crime

Abdullatif Mohammed Al Jismi - Head prosecution

Yousif Hassan – public prosecutor, Public Prosecutor

Mohammed Al Mannai

 

Mustafa Abdul Rahman secretary

Dubai courtJudges Moh Naabil, Fuad Hamdoun Yousif Faud

Chaired: Mr Moh Mahmoud Rasim

Judge: Mr Dr Ali Ibrahim Al Iman

Judge: Mr.Al Hadi Moh.Al Jadid

Judge: Mr.Moh.Nabil Moh RYad

Judge: Mr.Kharaf Fatah Al Bab Motually.

Public prosecution 19/5412letter (25/4/1999)

 

BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E.2006

5Checks needjustice_Case_10

I even sent legal notices in 2006 and 2008 to Raj Bernard, Dar al Adallah, Haris Accounting and Auditing, Central bank of UAE and Standard chartered bank (UK London) for all the injustice I suffered.

BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E.2006

5Checks needjustice_Case_10

I even sent legal notices in 2006 and 2008 to Raj Bernard, Dar al Adallah, Haris Accounting and Auditing, Central bank of UAE and Standard chartered bank (UK London) for all the injustice I suffered.

CHECKS DUBAI POLICE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT ,JUSTICE OR INJUSTICE

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

CBI BANK 827/2001

 

1.      Exhibit no.: FDeposit on 3702020225 Deposit receipt in name of my wife, only. Pooja’s without my wife Pooja’s signature withdrawn how??

2.        Bank debited my wife’s FD of an amount Dhs 425,750 without not under Lien, and without I reported to Central Bank of Dubai Authorities for justice, but once again I failed.

Why are we facing so many injustices in Dubai? Who will stop this, without my wife’s signature this amount was debited by a bank; an institution and there is no one to justify such offenses. this is the public prosecutor and the courts letter – on 20th feb. 2000, he did not attend the hearing and court gave decision of Jail. His passport is till today in the police station. Bank was not taking action on High  Rose and I had to recover my amount as the bank was each time saying that I was the guarantor so I took action and filed a case against High Rose, at Bur Dubai police station and against dhs 150,000/ we do not get bail easily. But High Rose had banks support and don’t know how he was released by submitting 2 passports and was released on bail. His judgment was on 20th feb. 2001, if he pays me money or goes

 

. pooj_receipt

file17001

file14-15-16026

 

 

 

CbI21pbankCbI22pbank

mr-bassam

WITHOUT HELP OF LAW, NOTHING IS POSSIBLE BUT IF U A E ’S LAW COURT MINISTER SUPPORTS CRIME THEN HOW WILL THERE BE JUSTICE IN THAT U A E CRIMINAL FREE .INVESTOR JAIL CASES 2198/012,1246/99,1555/012?

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

NotAvailable

KISHOR, Navani Kishor Ramchand                                                      LogoRed

HomeAbout INTERPOL  Core functionsNews Drugs and criminal organizations Financial and high-tech crime FugitivesWanted SearchRecent NoticesNational wanted web sitesFugitive investigations Public safety and terrorism Trafficking in human beings Other crime areas Regional activities International liaison Publications Recruitment

 

Present family name:

KISHOR

Forename:

NAVANI KISHOR RAMCHAND

Sex:

MALE

Date of birth:

2 February 1962 (45 years old)

Place of birth:

BOMBAI, India

Language spoken:

English, Hindi

Nationality:

India

 

Offences

 

Categories of Offences:

FRAUD

Arrest Warrant Issued by:

DUBAI / United Arab Emirates

IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION CONTACT

 

YOUR NATIONAL OR LOCAL POLICE

 

 

GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF INTERPOL

 

 

 

Check link http://www.needjustice.net/file16.doc

Check link http://www.needjustice.net/file17.doc

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

Dayal Mansukhani

Flat No. 19, Malkani Mahal, Dr. AB Road, Worli, Mumbai – 400 030, India

Tel: +91 22 24384011, Mob: +91 99696 83363, Email: md111248@yahoo.com

 

Date: October 9, 2008

 

M/s Galadari and Associates

Advocates and Legal Consultants,

PO Box 7992, Dubai, UAE

Email: info@galadarilaw.com

 

Copy to:

Mr. KK Sarachandra Bose, Partner

Dar Al Adalah

Advocates and Legal Consultants,

Office # 55-56, Zomorrodah Complex – B,

PO Box 15878, Dubai, UAE

Email: aladalah@daraladalah.com, boselaw@hotmail.com, aladalah@emirates.net.ae

 

Sir/s,

 

The Accused Wanted by Interpol and Dubai Courts

 

Re:      Kishor Ramachand Navani – Dayal vs. Commerical Bank International  Case No. 827/2001, 467/2002, 304/2003

Police Station: Al Rafa, Bur, Dubai

 

With reference to above, I hereby address you as under:

 

1.         The above matter was referred to you, when Mr. KKS Bose were associated with you. At the time of handing over this matter, I also handed over my other matters and paid fees including translation fee too.

 

2.         After your disassociation with Mr. KKS Bose, the matter remained with you. The Public Prosecution contacted you as you are/ were handling the above matters.

 

3.         The said Mr. Kishor Ramchand Navani has to pay me a sum of over AED 1 Million, the cheques whereof are lying with you. The details of cheques issued by Kishor R Navani issued to me are as under:

 

Cheque No.

Date

Amount AED

Cheques issued by

14255

20.12. 2000

150,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14248

15.01.2001

125,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14249

30.01.2001

125,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14250

15.02.2001

125,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14251

28.02.2001

150,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14252

10.03.2001

150,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14253

20.03.2001

150,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

14254

26.03.2001

150,000

High Rose International CBI Bank

 

1,125,000

Total

 

4.         Mr. Kishor Ramchand Navani has been operating in connivance and hands in glove with  several law flouters including bankers, police officers, lawyers, and he has been frauds and cheatings endlessly. With the help of some of the UAE law breakers, he managed to escape from the clutches of law. He was to be ordered to pay the amount to me February 20, 2001. You are requested to inform the Public Prosecution about usage of his counterfeit/ fake passport.

 

5.         The original passports of Mr. Kishore Ramchand Navani and his employee are confiscated by Bur Dubai Police Station against dishonour of Cheque for AED 150,000 issued to me. As per Dubai laws, no bail is granted for cheque above AED 50,000, however, he managed to get bail even against dishonour of cheque of AED 150,000.

 

6.         The Bank (Commercial Bank International) allow him  PDC facility for a sum of about AED 425 thousands without any lien on the fixed deposits and/or authority from Mrs. Pooja Mansukhani.

 

7.         As such, a principal amount of over AED 1.5 million is stuck up for recovery. If interest thereon is calculated, it will be more than AED 3.00 millions. Mr. Kishore R Navani is put in Wanted List of International Police Organization (Interpol).

 

8.         I paid to the translation fee and requested you to send me the following information and documents etc, however, you did not do so.

 

It is, therefore, requested you to, kindly, give the following information/ documents/ cheques/ papers etc:

 

i.          Original cheques for AED 1,125,000 as detailed hereinabove.

 

ii.         The name of the court within India before whom the Interpol had produced Mr. Kishor Ramchand Navani

iii.        Case number of the matter before the Indian Court

 

iv.        Next date of hearing of the case.  This is necessary so that I can attend on  the said date with my lawyer who would assist the lawyer of Interpol.

 

v.         Name of the lawyer representing Mr. Kishor Navani in India and any other relevant information in the matter.

You are requested to send the above information, cheques, documents, papers etc by Registered Post/ Courier and through mail (for information, documents convertible in soft copies).

 

An immediate action shall be highly appreciated. If Mr. Kishor Navani escapes any other country due to deletion of his name form Interpol, the matter shall be reported to media (print and electronic media). In case of any losses and damages to me on account of your laxity in handling the matter, you shall be responsible therefor. Kindly, acknowledge receipt.

 

Yours truly,

 

 

Dayal Mansukhani

 

PS:      Some of the relevant information/ documents are appended hereunder.

 

 

--- On Mon, 5/12/08, dayal mansukhani <mansukhani48@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: dayal mansukhani <mansukhani48@yahoo.com>
Subject: In the matter of Mr.Kishor Navani
To: info@galadarilaw.com
Cc: poojamans@hotmail.com
Date: Monday, May 12, 2008, 9:37 AM

 

 

Date: 12.5.2008

 

To :

Galadari & Associates

Advocates & Legal Consultants,


Dear Sirs,

This has reference to your fax dated 30th April 2008 seeking instructions about proposed translation of papers received from the office of Public Prosecution.   In this connection, I am a bit surprised at the sudden activity with regard to the case concerning Mr. Kishor Navani.  You are aware of the fact that Mr. Kishor Navani fled Dubai and he is avoiding the legal process so far.  This is for the plain reason that he is guilty.  Now, if I am not wrong, the question of receiving any fresh papers would arise only when someone is trying to enter into the proceedings at the behest of Mr. Kishor.  In that eventuality, I will have to take an appropriate call on commercial expediency.  It is clear that Mr.Kishor will not spend any money to fight the case unless he wants to return to Dubai or unless he has some problem due to the pending case.   In such an event he would be under pressure.

On my part, I need to know the expenses involved in translation.  Before that I must know as to what is the nature of the papers.   Are the papers received by the Public Prosecution from Mr. Kishor's advocates or are they some sort of administrative papers from their own office?    If Mr. Kishor's advocate has tendered these papers, what is the next date of hearing of the case before the Court?  To bring more pressure on Mr. Kishor, will it be worthwhile to make an effort to locate him - if he is within India- and file criminal proceedings?

I am anxiously waiting your reply. 
Dayal mansukhani

 

 


Dear Sir,

 

It is heartening to note that Kishor Navani was arrersted.   My wife Mrs. Pooja will talk to your office in the matter of translation work to be completed and the charges to be incurred for the same.  In the meantime, I have consulted a top criminal lawyer in Mumbai who has been handling cases relating to Interpol.  I was told that as Mr. Navani was arrested in India, the translated papers would finally form the basis of material to be placed before the competent court in India who would decide the issue of his extradition to UAE.  I was further told that it is advisable for me to engage a lawyer in this very same case and present my case so that I am finally successful in getting him extradited. After all, the lawyer representing Interpol would not be personally aware of the facts. He would argue the matter on the basis of documents that are submitted by Galdari to Dubai Police who would in turn provide the same to interpol.  This entire process is impersonal.  I am the complainant and am personally aware of all facts and  hence, my lawyer can convince the court about the need to extradite the culprit.  In fact, I was further told that since I am an Indian citizen and I am myself the complainant, I am entitled to enter into the witness box with permission of the court and give evidence.

 

For this purpose I require the following details:

1. The name of the court within India before whom the interpol had produced Mr. Navani

2. Case number of the matter before the Indian Court

3. Next date of hearing of the case.  This is necessary so that I can attend on  the said date with my lawyer who would assist the lawyer of interpol.

 

Sir, please protect my interest and help me by getting these details from the Dubai police. If I directly approach interpol office in India, it is like an ocean and I would find it difficult to trace out these details. However as there is ongoing correspondence between interpol and  Dubai police, it is very easy for Dubai police to get these details.  As my lawyer, you have a direct locus to ask for these details.  Hence please help me on top priority basis.

 

Regards,

 

Yours truly


Dayal mansukhani

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Mon, 5/12/08, dayal mansukhani <mansukhani48@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: dayal mansukhani <mansukhani48@yahoo.com>
Subject: In the matter of Mr.Kishor Navani
To: info@galadarilaw.com
Cc: poojamans@hotmail.com
Date: Monday, May 12, 2008, 9:37 AM

 

1              Mr. Kishor Ramchand Navani has been operating in connivance and hands in glove with  several law flouters including bankers, police officers, lawyers, and he has been frauds and cheatings endlessly. With the help of some of the UAE law breakers, he managed to escape from the clutches of law. He was to be ordered to pay the amount to me February 20, 2001. You are requested to inform the Public Prosecution about usage of his counterfeit/ fake passport.

 

2              The original passports of Mr. Kishore Ramchand Navani and his employee are confiscated by Bur Dubai Police Station against dishonour of Cheque for AED 150,000 issued to me. As per Dubai laws, no bail is granted for cheque above AED 50,000, however, he managed to get bail even against dishonour of cheque of AED 150,000.

 

3              The Bank (Commercial Bank International) allow him  PDC facility for a sum of about AED 425 thousands without any lien on the fixed deposits and/or authority from Mrs. Pooja Mansukhani.

 

4              As such, a principal amount of over AED 1.5 million is stuck up for recovery. If interest thereon is calculated, it will be more than AED 3.00 millions. Mr. Kishore R Navani is put in Wanted List of International Police Organization (Interpol).

 

5              I paid to the translation fee and requested you to send me the following information and documents etc, however, you did not do so.

 

It is, therefore, requested you to, kindly, give the following information/ documents/ cheques/ papers etc:

 

i.              Original cheques for AED 1,125,000 as detailed hereinabove.

ii.             The name of the court within India before whom the Interpol had produced Mr. Kishor Ramchand Navani

iii.            Case number of the matter before the Indian Court

iv.            Next date of hearing of the case.  This is necessary so that I can attend on  the said date with my lawyer who would assist the lawyer of Interpol.

v.             Name of the lawyer representing Mr. Kishor Navani in India and any other relevant information in the matter.

You are requested to send the above information, cheques, documents, papers etc by Registered Post/ Courier and through mail (for information, documents convertible in soft copies).

 

An immediate action shall be highly appreciated. If Mr. Kishor Navani escapes any other country due to deletion of his name form Interpol, the matter shall be reported to media (print and electronic media). In case of any losses and damages to me on account of your laxity in handling the matter, you shall be responsible therefor. Kindly, acknowledge receipt.

 

Yours truly,                       Dayal Mansukhani

 

 

 

Dated –

Place

Petitioner.

 

 

Dayal –Vs- CBI

http://www.needjustice.net/file16.doc

http://www.needjustice.net/file17.doc

 

Dayal –Vs- CBI 827/2001,

Part C : CBI case no. 827/2001

2.      Exhibit no.: FDeposit on 3702020225 Deposit receipt in name of my wife, only. Pooja’s without my wife Pooja’s signature withdrawn how??

3.      Bank debited my wife’s FD of an amount Dhs 425,750 without  not Under Lien, and without my wife Pooja’s signature this deposit was withdrawn how?? I reported to Central Bank of Dubai Authorities for justice, but once again I failed.

4.      Why are we facing so many injustices in Dubai? Who will stop this, without my wife’s signature this amount was debited by a bank; an institution and there is no one to justify such offenses.

IN THE COURT OF FEDRAL SUPREME COURT OF CASSATION IN ABU DHABI

 

REVIEW/ CURATIVE PETITION NO.                 OF 2006

IN

APPEAL NO.                     OF

IN

PETITION NO.                   OF

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani                                     ]

Having his permanent address at                           ]

19, Malkani Mahal, Dr. A. B. Road,                     ]

Worli, Mumbai 400 030.                                                ] Petitioner

 

Versus

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK       ] Resp.

 

 

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP :-

 

THE HUMBLE PETITION ON BEHALF

OF THE PETITIONER ABOVENAMED

 

1                   The petitioner is a Citizen of India having his address at as stated above in the cause title of the petition. The respondent is a Banking Company duly incorporated under the company’s law. The petitioner is a Businessmen and he was running his business from Dubai, UAE for around 25 years. The petitioner has traded and carried out business in Transportation, Textile trading, Finance etc. the petitioner has financed many individual and organization in Dubai. The petitioner has a good reputation in Dubai trade circle as he is very successful businessman. Though the petitioner has many friends in Dubai business class he has also attracted some enemies due to business competition.

2                   The petitioner opened an account in the above Bank in the year 1993. The Bank Director was friend of the petitioner. So on his request I have deposited more than Million $ in the said bank in fixed deposit. I sued to obtain bank facility against the fixed deposit; hence, I have signed some blank documents for creating a lien in favour of the bank. Even otherwise as I am illiterate person and do not know to write the bank officers used to fill up the bank forms for me.

3                   Until the year 2000, I was treated as VIP customer in the above bank. During this period, I have some dispute with Standard Chartered Bank as they have dishonored Bank Guarantee cheque issued in my favour, as a result, they pressurized my brother and me. In 1999, my elder brother died of heart attack sues the pressure from Standard Chartered Bank. Similarly, in May 1999 my other Brother died succumbing to the pressure from the said Bank. During this period, I have also suffered two major heart attacks. I was admitted in Dubai Hospital.

4                   As my business was prospering I used to get 2,00,000 U.S. $ interest and 1,00,000 U.S. $ I used to earn annually in those days. As my health was not in good condition I decided to prepare a will, but the Dubai Court refused to recognize the will, as it is not in consonance with the Dubai Law. Nonetheless, I decided to make a will with the Indian Consulate.

5                   I have also decided to appoint a nominee for my Fixed Deposit account but they again refused to comply with my instruction saying that it is also not allowed in accordance with Dubai law. I entered my wifes name in joint account in F.D. then I learned that on my death my wife will not get all the money and the account will be seized as per the Dubai Law.Ultimately I decided to break the Fixed Deposit in my name and decided to deposit the sum in my wifes name and did so accordingly.

6                   When I demanded the documents signed by me for creating the lien, the CBI refused to return back me the papers saying that as I no longer a depositor the lien papers are of no use to the Bank as it has no value.In July 1999 I was admitted in Dubai Hospital for heart plastic surgery, I was under the pressure from Standard Chartered bank in one case I was fined 2000 Dhr. I went to appeal against the order there was lot of pressure on me and it resulted into detoriated of mental and physical health. I used to get threatening calls from Standard bank Officers calling me to withdraw the cases filed against them or fact dire consequences.

7                   During that period, I had already invested heavily in Dubai Market, One High Rose to whom I have lent 1 Million Dhr. Had issued me post-dated cheque. He requested me for time so that he can obtain loan form the Bank, as he has account in the same Bank I have accepted his request.  The Officer from High Rose transferred 4 Lakh Dhr. To my account. In and around Oct 2000 4 lakh was deposited in my account, which clearly shows that he must have applied much prior to Oct 2000 to the bank for such facilities. During that period, the F.D. was in my wifes name. My wife did not signed any lien letter ever except one on which loan facilities was obtained only that Fixed deposit was under lien.

8                   30 Oct 2000- I with my wife decided to purchase a Government Bond issued by Indian Government in the name of Resurgence Bond for which we were short of $ 60,000/- as on 30th Oct 2000 our one Fixed Deposit was maturing we decided to used that money. We requested the CBIO Bank to break that FD and pay us $ 60,000/- and reinvest the rest sum again. The CBI paid us $ 60,000/- accordingly, when I went in the Bank to prepare Draft the Bank Officers asked me to sign some documents as I had good relation with the Bank I signed the documents without any doubt  I have also put a date below my signature which was 31st Oct 2000.

9                   In 2001 Feb the Bank officers showed me the same letters saying that this is a lien papers  saying that balance of 120$  in the account of High Rose. I told them that I did not give them guarantee and that the High Rose already owes me ! Millions $. Then they showed me a lien letter dated 28th Oct 2000 which bears my signature, but not of my wife in whose name the FD account was laying. Therefore, they created a lien in my wifes account based on my signature. At that time all FD were in my wifes name.

10              When admittedly all fixed deposit account were in my wifes name how can the a bank create lien without her knowledge and without her express consent  the bank created a lien in my wifes account to the tune of 125000 $ without her knowledge. I have receipt of bank issued by them on 28th Oct 2000 of FD which does not show any under lien endorsement. The High Rose has requested me to provide him a Bank Guarantee for 1 Million so that he can repay me the loaned amount of 1 million $ after one month.

11              I state that High Rose applied for LBD cheque facility on 19th October 2000, against this he deposited his personal guarantee as well as its company’s cheques in CBI favor, its clients PDC cheques of Dhs 425,750/. This means CBI had 3 guarantees – more than dhs 800,000/ PDC’s and personal guarantee and dhs 425,750 cheque of its company. After taking so many guarantees his LBD facility was passed.

12              The High Rose owes me more than dhs 850,000/. He transferred from his High Rose account to my account on 28th oct. 00 amount dhs 400,000/. This is confirms that High Rose facility is passed before 28th October 2000.

13              From 1993 I had my well maintained accounts with CBI term deposits. I used to use my term deposits against my account facility. I have never used bank’s money. On 29th oct, 00, I transferred these funds to term deposit account. On 30th oct. 00, my term deposit no. 370202000225 of amount US $ 180,000/ was due. Bank asked me if I wanted to renew the fixed deposit, I gave instructions to withdraw US $ 60,000 as I wanted it and balance to fix in term deposit. On 31st October 2000 I visited the bank and I don’t know English the bank officers  had prepared a letter dated 30th October 2000 and I signed that paper without noticing as I was in hurry but when I signed luckily I had added date to my signature.

14              Surprisingly If this fixed term deposit no. 370202000225 was UNDER LIEN then to break this deposit – the bank needs an application, no bank will break this Lien without manager’s approval it is not broken easily in few days. I am also giving more proof that this fixed deposit is not Under Lien; even CBI letter will show that this was not Under Lien. The most important thing this fixed deposit is not in my name it was in my wife’s name Pooja Dayal Mansukhani, so it was necessary to take sign from Pooja as well, which the bank does not have. After having so many evidences in my favor, Dubai Court has dismissed the case. So I appealed to  the appeal court case no 467/2002 and submitted private auditor’s report –appeal also dismissed., ignoring the well placed evidence on record and relying upon extraneous material.

15              I have faxed documents which  will prove that how many times I have warned the bank that High Rose had planned to run away and take action, and recover their amount. As High Rose had to pay me more dues and I had filed a case against High Rose of dhs 150,000/ at the Bur Dubai Police station, they kept passport as guarantee and let him go on bail. The judgment was on 20th Feb. 2001. I had full guarantee that before this date he will flee from the country, because I had more PDC cheques still with me, if would not run then he would had to pay me those. And for these reasons I was calling the bank and asking them to take action or else they will lose lot of money – but the bank did not take any precautions even after telling them his intentions of escaping from the country, this also shows that bank had helped him to escape or they were with him.

16              I assuming was the guarantor, then the bank should had on 19th October 2000, when he had applied the facility, should had taken my signature, which they don’t have. Fixed term deposit no. 370202000225, was in the name of alone (single) Pooja’s name if this in Lien then pooja’s sign should be on the Lien form, very necessarily. On 25th Jan. 2001, High Rose’s all PDC cheques were bounced the same time why did not the bank debit from my account the amount if I was the guarantor.

17              If I am the guarantor then why did the bank deposit the High Rose cheques which were in bank favour of amount dhs 400,000/? And if they deposited and it was returned then why they did not take any action, this is crucial question of facts. I had submitted 5,6 applications showing them the courts letter and asking them if I was guarantor then issue me a letter so I could go and file a criminal case against him.  Why they did not issue me a letter?

18              On 20th feb. 2002, High Rose did not appear in the Dubai Court, passport is still with the Police station, after this man fled from the country the bank debited from my term deposit the amount, This shows or even proves that High Rose got the help from Bank – before he could be caught and put behind bars, then bank would not be able to debit from my account the amount easily. Important: High Rose after escaping from Dubai – still had contacts with CBI bank, and they asked him to send a fax against me, where it is stating that I was asking him some wrong statement, and showing this the bank scared me that they would on this fax behalf would put me behind bars.

19              The petitioner has not filed any other petition or challenged the orders in any other court of law.

20              The delay in taking out this petition be condoned as the petitioner being held up in Australia for his Business purpose and presently residing in India, he could not due to legal knowledge file this petition earlier.

21              The petitioner is paying the court fees of DHR.___________ as fixed court fees.

22              The petitioner has no alternate and efficacious alternate remedy available and reliefs sought in the present petition will be suffice to do full and final justice between the parties.

23              The petitioner submits that there is substantial and crucial issues regarding law is involved in the above matter.

24              The petitioner craves leave to refer and rely upon the compilation of documents in support of this petition.

25              The petitioner shall rely upon the compilation of documents in support of this case separately.

26              The petitioner therefore prays that-

 

a)     That after going through the legalities and proprieties in the above matte records and proceedings from the lower court be called for.

b)    That after going through the records and proceedings in the above matter and hearing the parties this Hon’ble court be pleased to remand the matter for fresh trail

c)     That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition this Hon’ble court be pleased to stay the order passed in ______________

d)    That any other just and appropriate order as this court thinks fit and proper may be passed.

e)     That cost of this petition be provided with.

 

 

Dated –

Place

Petitioner.

Civil case no. 157/2000 Khaleej Times

The case against the Khaleej Times started on 28 January 1999 - Alliance Insurance Company issued – coverage starting from 28/01/1999 to 27/01/2000  (Insurance Coverage).  It is clearly seen on the copy that 2000 it is over written but the starting date is genuine. I have a copy of this as proof.

The coverage was due to be paid on the death of my brother which was certified by Dubai Hospital. Time of death date 29/01/99. Why has this claim not been received to date?

DAYAL MANSUKHANI 0507570737

Exhibit no. 9. Hospital ID no. 7611331) Rashid hospital.

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

Mental torture me Some H.H. Police King Dhahi Khalfan law Team Dubai FOR 14 YEARS no help uae Police

I WAS ATTACKED PERSONALLY  Accordingly I was admitted in Dubai Hospital on 8th july 1999. On 9th july 1999 I received a call that I should take back all the cases against Raj Bernard and SCB and if I don’t do so then maybe during operation an accident can occur and I will be declared dead.My other 2 brother also expired 29/1/1999 & 7/5/1999 he received some Raj strange call

My other brother also expired

My other 2 brother also expired when visited Mumbai – at night he slept and other

Day did not wake up- he was all alone there – and he received some SCB strange call and was not alive

this is good that I have this proof – by Dubai Government that his death was on 29th January 1999. (if it would had been of some other country then they could say it is fake certificate)

 

File 13.  CASE 157/ 2000 Khaleej time recd. Payment on 27th January 99

 

file-10-13010

Below – Alliance Insurance policy confirms insurance date – starts from 28/1/99 to 27/1/00. ( no alteration in both these dates)

file-10-13009

Exhibit no. 9. Hospital ID no. 7611331) Rashid hospital.

 

I am fighting against injustice since 14 years but no one cares to even listen. I am not doing this for myself I am bringing to your kind attention the misconducts, misdemeanor, frauds and criminal actions that even were causes of suicides in the city due to Raj, Standard chartered bank, and other legal/judicial/ protective authorities in Dubai who support crime.

Such people are being helped and those who live in Dubai, respectfully for more than 34 years without any criminal record are being tortured.

To suppress / hide one crime 100’s of crimes are made, thereafter. For one case injustice I lost two big brothers, in heart failure. In 98, 99 I suffered heart attacks and was even tried to kill. Threat was given to pressure me, that I would die on the operation table.

 

1st July 1999, Doctor Redhwan gave an un-fair statement that stent was not available, and it was cancelled just 5 minutes before the time of operation. 1st July 1999If the record of hospital will be checked you will see the same stent was used for another operation on the same day. I had date of 18/10/2011 Rashid hospital cancelled my Heart operation I did not attend, why central jail Nut sent me Heart operation

1st July 1999, hospital called me and asked me to get admitted on 8th july 1999– and that the stent was available. Accordingly I was admitted in Dubai Hospital on 8th july 1999. On 9th july 1999 I received a call that I should take back all the cases against Raj Bernard and SCB and if I don’t do so then maybe during operation an accident can occur and I will be declared dead. When my arteries were blocked as you can read – all the 3 – one 100%, one 90% and one 65% and if someone in this state receives a call in this way – then you can understand what can happen – he can die on the spot. And the next day really it happened – my operation was cancelled – Dr Redhwan cancelled the operation. This proves that so big hospital was also under the SCB and Raj, they had powers and Dr Redhwan was good as he could not kill me but cancelled the operation.

 

file-10-13016

file-10-13015

 

 

This statement proves that my operation is cancelled on 10th july 1999. In this manner they have pressurizeda heart patient by phone calls.

file-10-13024

 

 

 

 

 

file-10-13017

 

mr bose and dayal agreement page 2

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

mr bose and dayal agreement

 

Doc1

CRIME PLAYS WITH BRIBE LAW U A E?  100% EVIDENCE WITH PICTURE

 

file-14-17-1-ext009

 

 

 

 

file-14-17-1-ext010

 

 

 

files689025

 

 

 

1.    Below is the list of PDC cheques with due date and the cheque number.

 

Case no. 557/98, was dismissed. A      903/98&557/98.

19

201

 

 

This document is the auditing report of Al Rubaie and co . he is n authorized auditor and the Dubai court accepts his auditing report. This report was done for me in 1998 , because on February 7 1998 Raj , wrote a letter to Dubai dry docks  to stop paying me and so all my cheques were bouncing from then on. I had submitted the below mentioned report to court in 1998. In UAE ,  charging interest is illegal and Raj had filed a wrong case on him making charges that I was charging interest on him. So I had submitted this report in the Dubai court

file11007

 

 

.

file11008

 

 

file11009

 

 

file11010

 

 

 

file11011

 

 

 

file11012

 

 

 

file11013

 

Case No: 577 of 1998, was dismissed.

Government of Dubai
Dubai Court of
First Instance
Behalf of His
Highness Sheikh Maktoum bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai
Public meeting
held on ethane at the Dubai Court of First Instance.
Under the chairmanship of
Mr. Justice: Fouad Mahmoud Amin Shalaby
The
membership of:
Mr.
Judge: Mohamed Hani
Mr.
Judge: Ghassan al-Shawa
And the presence of
Secretary: Abdullah Mohamed Ahmed
Issued
the following provision
In
Case No.: 577 of 1998 total commercial
Uploads
: Pisco International (LLC. LLC. M. M)
Against:
Dial Manso Khani
After reviewing
the documents and hearing oral argument and deliberation

PO 2 continued rule in the proceedings 557 \ 1998 total trade
Tthsal facts - it shows the view from the papers - in that the Prosecutor
Argued about the defendant to judge my appoint an expert to determine the amount of the loan
And the amounts calculated from the portable dry basin Dubai, Mashreq Bank and Habib
Chartz Bank and Standard Bank for the defendant and inventory checks in the possession of the defendant
And determining the amounts of additional own and then be obligated to pay additional amounts in addition to expenses
            She said her statement that, under an agreement concluded between them in the borrowed 23/07/1996
Of which $ 400,000 AED without Fouad and committed to remit installments of the amounts
Owed to it by the pool and Dubai Dry account with Mashreq Bank as collateral for the implementation of the obligation of restitution also handed over checks of the numbers 625347 to 625356 and
Sending it back once fully pay the entire loan Taking The total amounts received
Statement from both sides Safatty amount 1,544,599 AED, but he refused to re-team

 

P. 3 continued rule in the case 557 \ 1998 total trade
, Prompting a lawsuit to establish the above statement.
      Provided Taida portfolio documents turned a copy of:
Of the loan contract concluded between them in the 07/23/1996.
Messages issued from the Dubai Dry Docks, and several banks to transfer funds from their account
To the account of the defendant.
Payroll calculation and disclosure checks delivered to him.
Photo penal provisions.
      Such as a note guaranteed by the defendant and his defense based on the existence of
Financial transactions between them and the attached photocopies of several checks and accounting reports
    3/21/1999 session and ruled the court appointment of an expert accounting for the statement 'What is the amount
Delivered from the defendant to the plaintiff and the percentage and total amount paid by him to
Heya and checks issued by him and appropriate at the failure of this expert and Managing Director
To provide for his request of the parties a hearing on 15.5.2000 replaced rivalry

 

P. 4 continued rule in the case 557 \ 1998 total commercial
The court held
the sentencing hearing today, Deputy Prosecutor introduced and applied
To bring it back
to the pleadings and annexed documents, pay attention to him the court.
Since the
original clearance in humans and that the evidence of the alleged
And the right
of denied based on this that if the plaintiff did not provide the same reasons,
Documents
and data, it is considered to have failed to establish the right claimed by
And
his claim should be dismissed.
Since
it was obvious Prosecutor newspaper which reported her claim and a note
Defense
that it is not merely a word sending it as there is no evidence that it provided
Documents
does not indicate the fact contractual relations and the parties and the defendant Naqdha
Despite the
Court's response to request appointment of an expert, but it could not be directly due to the Tax Office
Closed
some time ago and then her claim to be non-support of fact and law
Rejection
due to bind with their expenses pursuant to Article 133 of the Criminal Procedure Law

The below mentioned agreement proves that BESCO was supplying man power to dubai dry dock. And BESCO gets the payment after 60 days. Since the labor should be paid every one month , Mr Raj took 400,000 cash from me and gave me PDC cheques  and said that Dubai Dry docks would transfer the money in to my account every month and I was deducting my installment amount and was paying the remaining amount. All the details  of the cheques and cash that I had given to him are mentioned below.

 

حكومة دبي

محكمة دبي الابتدائية

باسم صاحب السمو الشيخ مكتوم بن راشد آل مكتوم حاكم دبي

بالجلسه العلنيه المعقودة يوم الاثين بمقر محكمة دبي الابتدائية .

برئاسة السيد القاضي : فؤاد محمود أمين شلبي

وعضويه كل من :

السيد القاضي : محمد هاني

والسيد القاضي : غسان الشوا

وحضور أمين السر : عبدالله أحمد محمد

أصدرت الحكم التالي

في الدعوي رقم : 577 لسنة 1998 تجاري كلي

المرفوعه من : بيسكو انترناشيونال (ش.ذ.م.م)

ضد : ديال مانسو خاني

بعد الاطلاع علي الأوراق وسماع المرافعه الشفوية والمداول

 

 

 

 

 

ص 2               تابع الحكم      في الدعوى رقم 557\ 1998 تجارى كلي

تتحصل الوقائع – على ما يبين من مطالعة الاوراق – فى أن المدعيه

اختصمت المدعي عليه للحكم بتعين خبير حسابي لتحديد مبلغ القرض

والمبالغ المحموله من حسابها بحوض دبي الجاف وبنك المشرق وحبيب

بنك وستاندر تشارتز بنك لحساب المدعي عليه وحصر الشيكات التي بحوزة المدعى

وتحديد المبالغ  الاضافيه الخاصة بها ثم الزامه بسداد المبالغ الاضافية بالاضافة الى المصروفات

وقالت بيانا لها أنه بموجب اتفاق مبرم بينها في 23-7-1996 اقترضت

منه مبلغ 400,000 درهم بدون فؤاد والتزمت بسداده مقسطا من مبالغ

مستحقة لها بحوض دبي الجاف ومن حسابها لدى بنك المشرق وكضمان

لتنفيذ التزامها بالرد سلمته ايضا الشيكات من أرقام 625347 الى 625356 وعلى

أن يعيدها بمجرد تمام دفع كامل القرض واذ بلغت جملة المبالغ التى حصل عليها

من الجهتين سالفتى البيان مبلغ 1,544,599 درهم الا انه رفض اعادة الفرق

ورد الشيكات وهددها بتقديم الشيكات للبنك مالم تحرر له شيكات اخرى

وبمبالغ اضافيه فانصاعت له وأصدرت له شيكات اضافيه وبتاريخ لاحق

اضطرت الي اقتراض مبلغ 300,000 درهم منه وتم سداده بالزياده حتى بلغ

جملة ما تقاضاه منها للقرضين مبلغ 700,000 درهم وبمطالبة برده امتنع

وابلغ الجهات المختصة ببعض الشيكات التى بحوزته وقضى ضدها فى احدهمها

 

 

 

 

ص3    تابع الحكم              فى الدعوى رقم 557\1998   تجارى كلي

 

مما حدا بها الى اقامة الدعوى سالفة البيان .

وقدمت تأيدا حافظة مستندات طويت علي صورة من :

عقد من القرض المبرم بينهما في 23-7-1996.

رسائل صادرة منها لحوض دبي الجاف وعدة بنوك لتحويل مبالغ من حسابها

الي حساب المدعي عليه.

كشوف حساب وكشف بالشيكات المسلمة اليه .

صور أحكام جزائيه.

مثل المدعي عليه مذكرة ضمنتها دفاعه والقائم على وجود

تعاملات ماليه بينهما وأرفقت بها صور ضوئيه لعدة شيكات وتقارير محاسبي

وبجلسة 21-3-1999 قضت المحكمه بندب خبير محاسبي لبيان ما هية المبالغ

المسلمه من المدعي عليه للمدعيه ونسبتها وجملة ما سددته له منها

وما هية الشيكات التي أصدرتها له ومناسبة ذلك وازاء تقاعس الخبير المنتدب

عن تقديم تقريره طلب طرفى الخصومه بجلسة 15-5-2000 استبداله بالخبير

صاحب الدور التالي فقدم تقريرا بجلسة 5-2-2001  أورد به المدعيه

تخلفت عن الحضور رغم استدعاءها وأفاد وكيلها بأنها مغلقة منذ مدة وتعذر

عليه بالتالي الانتقال الي مقرها للاطلاع علي ما لديها من مستندات

 

 

 

ص4   تابع الحكم                فى الدعوى رقم 557\1998  تجاري كلي

وقررت المحكمة اصدار الحكم بجلسة اليوم فقدم وكيل المدعيه طلبا

لاعادتها الي المرافعة وأرفق به مستندات تلتفت اليه المحكمة .

وحيث أن الاصل في الانسان براءة الذمة وأن البينة علي من ادعي

واليمين علي من أنكر وينبني علي ذلك أنه اذا لم يقدم المدعي مالديه من

مستندات وبيانات فانه يعتبر قد عجز عن اقامة الحق الذى يدعيه

ويتعين رفض دعواه .

لما كان ذلك وكان البين مما أوردته المدعية بصحيفة دعواها ومذكرة

دفاعها أنه لا يعدو أن يكون قولا مرسلا لا دليل عليه كما أن ما قدمته من

مستندات لا يدل علي حقيقة العلاقات التعاقديه وأطرافها وناقضها المدعى عليه

ورغم استجابة المحكمة لطلبها بندب خبير الا أنه تعذر مباشرة المأمورية بسبب

غلقها منذ مدة ومن ثم تكون دعواها على غير سند من الواقع والقانون

واجبة الرفض مع الزامها مصروفاتها عملا بالمادة 133 من قانون الاجراءات الجنائية

المدنية .

 

فلهذه الاسباب

حكمت المحكمة برفض الدعوى وألزمت المدعية مصروفاتها ومبلغ

ألفين درهم مقابل أتعاب المحاماة

 

 

 

 

FOR 14 YEARS Mental torture me Dubai law Team

Each of these files is worth billions of dollars

These awards are worth billions of dollars today. Because of these awards I embarked on a world tour that took me to as far as the USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and during this tour, I received many awards. After this tour I decided to come back to Dubai, where it all started.

Before 1998 I had never been to any court, but after those two awards, the law became a weapon used by my enemies against me. The world respects UAE court award that is why many other courts called me to give their own award.

 

The minutes of the Public Prosecution beset with: Director of Bisco named Bernard Raj

Reopened the record on Monday, 15.03.1999 M in the 12 noon at the Public Prosecution

Authority above

As today is the deadline for achieving the company with the Director of the World Bisco called Bernard RajI borrowed an amount of five hundred thousand dirhams from the accused Minsokany return, handed him three checks in that amount AED 100,000 and rolled Statendr Chartdr bank and the check is payable on 15.07.199--? AD has paid the full amount of the loan to the defendant at different times has not taken or recovered checks from the defendant on merit and after the due date are not entitled to claim its value has fulfilled it in all the debts after the due date requested by the accused Minsokany checks, but he told me he had Christnfez checks for the friendly and he is prepared to lend me any time I want a month ago Director called and learned that the accused had forged the due date in item Year

Note we have presented the check in question to a witness present

Q: Can we check the thermometer and you Bahrdah site by you?

A: I signed on the check Vtm The rest of the data printed by the bank in my presence and the bank manager and the employee concerned and signed on the back of the check to ensure the collection of value to the beneficiary on 07/15/199--?6 at maturity m

Q: Are you who you hand over a check for the invited Minsokany dayal  A: Yes,

 

Name: Lawrence Bernard Korisaban Nationality: Indian Age: 42 years Date: 12/02/99 two checks (200000404975or76 ?

Yes I handed over the check with no data asked them to edit the amount of (200000) AED for the benefit of the beneficiary and then guaranteed to pay for the purpose of enabling me to get a loan from the called / humus - the part of banking facilities but I told the bank I can not meet the value of the check that date and requested an extension and was before the days of the date of Due the above-mentioned and already asked me to bring the check to them, where the Bank has changed the due date I signed the amendment reported at the front of the check as adopted by the Bank once again from behind and with respect to the change that I see now the most stylish of any in the box months, I do not think one may be caused by other than the beneficiary of any humus because the check has stayed with him until now and I would like to add that there are two checks others were Aatmahma to push the coffee one amount (200000) AED As to how any change to obliterate the ancient history and print the new date does not mention that he had been to check one or all of history, as is evident by check subject of this complaint and this can advise me on the validity of the overall sign.

The record closed on that at 2 pm and we decided the following:
First, ensure the continuation of the accused on bail earlier signed by the police.
Second, the presence of a request by the Director of a company called Global Bisco Nbernard Raj and the company accountant named Harry in the session to achieve M 15/03/1999

Reopened the record on Monday, 15/03/1999 m at exactly 12:30 pm at the Public Prosecution

 

Place: Investigation office – Registries

Time: 11:20

Date: 4/8/98

Name: Mohammad Abdullah Al Obaidally

Nationality: UAE

Sex: Male

Occupation : Lawyer

Age: 36 years old

Place of Birth: Abu Dhabi

Mothers Name Aziza

Residence Address: (Illigible) – Misherif

Tel: 050-6468616

Work Address: Al Khaleej Advocates – Maktoum Street, Ras Al Khaima Bldg.

Tel: 28808

 

I, Lieutenant Abdul Magid Fadil, have written the testimony of the abovementioned person who is the reporter of this incident, he testified as follows:

Korespan Lawrence issued a cheque for the benefit of our client Mansukhani Dayal Hassaram, Indian national. The bank that the cheque drawn from – Standard Chartered have stamped and guaranteed the value of the cheque – or the cheque was verified and can be on its due date, considering that the bank had taken all necessary procedures before certifying and guaranteeing the value of the cheque, for which reason the beneficiary (our client) accepted the cheque.

When our client submitted the cheque, the bank refused to fulfill the cheque and told our client to refer to the drawer.  This kind of procedure can only be done on normal cheques which are not certified or guaranteed.  Our client attempted so many times to collect the amount of the cheque but the bank refused without any right, and that is a crime that the law punishes for according the article 402 of the Federall Punishment Law No. 3 of 1987.

 

S C BANK’ SOUR MIGHT IS RIGHT AND OUR MONEY CANS BY ANY CITIZEN ANY WHERE IN UAE. IN UAE EVERY WHERE WHERE S C BANK’ MONEY POWER IS THERE WE CAN MANIPULATE THE CIVIL LAW INTO CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST YOU AND WE WILL PROVE THAT WE ARE ALWAYS RIGHT EVEN IF WE INDEED WRONG OTHERWISE

Stewart Hamond Nationality: British

According to the copy, we were sure that the cheque was forge and that was why we refused to fulfill the cheque.

 

Place: Investigation office

Time: 12:30

Date: 4/8/98

Name: Stewart Hamond

Nationality: British

Sex: Male

Occupation: Chief of Investigation –investigation

Age: 40 years

Place of Birth: Britain

Mothers Name: Watson

Residence Address: Al Wasl near the Iranian

Tel: 421692

Work Address: Standard Chartered Bank

Tel: 5070670

 

I,  Lieutenant Abdul Magid Fadil, have written the testimony of the above mentioned person who is investigated in the fact of the returned cheque.  He is the representative of the defendant bank. He testified as follows:

Yes, it happened that Korespan Lorence of Besco International Company have issued a cheque No. 404977 drawn from our bank on 15/7/96, or that is due date was for more than two years. TRhe cheque was actuallu certified by the bank to be fulfilled on its due date, but the benefiaciary did not forward the cheque until 15/7/98.

 

It was clear that there was an alteration on the date of the year which was changed for the same year. We had a copy of the same cheque that we took from the owner f the account when we suspected the cherub to be forged.  According to the copy, we were sure that the cheque was forge and that was why we refused to fulfill the cheque.

 

They returned again on 22/7 after being visited by the bearer of the cheque the beneficiary – Mr. Dayal Mansukhani whereas he contacted the bank and the bank sent for receiving the matter and investigating the same, and told him the reason for not fulfilling the cheque. The amount is One Hundred thousand dirhams.  It was a forgery on the cheque.  Another cheque had been reviewed that is dated 15/10/98, it was also forged on the date of the year. The year was altered to 98 instead of 96, and the number of the cheque / 404976. He requested assistance on the matter, and I told him to write a letter to the bank and the bank would officially reply with the reasons for not fulfilling the cheque, but he submitted the cheque for the second time and it was again returned. He then wrote a letter to the bank that was received on 28/7/98 and we replied to him on the matter. As previously did and refused to cash the cheque.

 

On the same date, I met the lawyer of the drawer or Besco International and they owed the bank an amount more than one hundred thoudsand. There I found the ssame copy of the same cheques, that bear clearly the due year which is 1996. I took the copy from them. No, Irequested them to give me the copy f the cheque but they refused in the urgent meeting. And on 26/7/98, the said beneficiary sent us a copy of a letter written to the Cetral Bank, and did not add anything tothat when the cheque was submitted for the third time on 25/7/98.

 

The same cheque returned and on 2/8/98, I received a letter (copy) by fax from the lawyer of the beneficiary requesting fulfillment or cashing the cheque within three days, and did not add anything because the three days did not end yet – or still I have one day more to reply to them. On Sunday 30/8/98 I contacted the lawyer of he drawer (Besco International), they sent me three copies of the three cheques related to the subject in the name of the beneficiary and it was clear on the cheques in comparison with the furnished cheque that there is a forgery on the date.

 

I would like to add in my testimony that he book from which the cheques were taken (illegible) from the bank on 95 and one of the people who signed on the certification was Mr. Khorshid Anphala, who left the job on 96, and the second person was transferred to a branch of the bank in Qatar on 97 and the latter left our branch on April 96 after the certification, that clearly (illegible) that the alteration on the cheques was done on the certification after issuance of the cheques wa done on the certification after issuance of the cheques and that is a clear forgery for not having a signature on the alteration or on the erasure on the furnished cheque.

 

We are in the process of issuing a complaint to submit to the police- for the accusation of forgery and this is the letter of the bank for the complaint of this cheque, and I have explained to the beneficiary that if he wanted to make a complaint against anybody in this regard, we would be ready to forward the necessary assistance.  This is my testimony and on it I sign.

(Signed)

. My witness e-mail address & fax

 

 

 

 

28a

29a

30a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E AT ABU DHABI  PETITION NO.        OF 2006

BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E.2006

5Checks needjustice_Case_10

I even sent legal notices in 2006 and 2008 to Raj Bernard, Dar al Adallah, Haris Accounting and Auditing, Central bank of UAE and Standard chartered bank (UK London) for all the injustice I suffered.

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V - Dar AL- Adalah

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V - Mr. K.K.Sarachandra Bose

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V - HARIS & ASSOCIATES

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V - Standard Chartered Bank

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V - INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V Khaleej Times:

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V  Attn.: Mr. Gordhan Awtaney.

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V ANIL TRADING CO. LLC

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V Abu-Anil Gen.Trdg.Co.

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani - V GOVERDHAN DAS AWTANEY

 
Dayal –Vs- Besco International 183/2000,
3.Dayal –Vs- CBI:827/2001,
4.Besco – Vs- Dayal:   557/1998,

5.Kavitha Arjandas – Vs- Khaleej Times:157/2000,

(PARTNER) Dar Al-Adalah Advocates & Legal Consultants

My lawyers K.K. Bose email From Click http://www.needjustice.net/file20.doc

like doings of Bose www.daraladalah.com

Plz re-open these Case nos. 1246/99, 557/98 (454/2002 appeal), 658/2001,827/2001, 157/2000, 183/2001.

All these case details are with my lawyer Mr K. K. S. Bose Dar Al Adallah. Please transfer thecases to lower court in Duabi or if you cannot give justice to an Indian citizen, transfer these cases to India.

Now I am also pleading the Public Prosecutor and or Dubai Police to file a complaint on Dar Al Adallah and K K Subhashchandra Bose. I have already sent him two notices in 2006 and 2008. Also via email I have sent to Bar consulates in Abu Dhabi, UAE about their criminal acts. The lawyer K K Bose email confirms he received my notice and his reply also I am attaching herewith for your kind examination. He took advantage because I was abroad he thought I will not return to Dubai, but I am back in Dubai. He has not only lost this one case but almost all of my other cases too.

From :

"Bose Bose" <boselaw@hotmail.com>

Add boselaw@hotmail.com to My Messenger Contacts.

Date:      Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:07:32 +0530  From:"KK SARACHANDRA BOSE" <boselaw@gmail.com>   Add to Address Book   Add Mobile Alert  Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by gmail.com. Learn more

To:          mansukhani48@yahoo.com

Subject: Re: Notice: LAST & FINAL REPLY FROM KK BOSE.

CC:         boselaw@hotmail.com

July 14, 2006                                        (By email: mansukhani48@yahoo.com),

Dear Mr. Dayal Mansukhani,

Reference is made to your notice dated 10 July 2006

 

SCB original cheques, we have filed application to the court to bring the file from the archives and get us the original cheques and till date  the file has not come to the judge.

 

In respect to your Bombay cases, I had handed over all the original cheques to the Bombay lawyer

MRS. VANDANA D. JAISINGH  ADVOCATE & NOTARY  She had at that time informed me that all the cases were time barred as per the laws applicable in India.

 

I will not have any hesitation to file a case against you in Australia for using threats and defamation, if necessary, you and your family travel on the right path).

 

Mr. Dayal, I have a better suggestion for you, spend your money   (This reply is sent not as a duty nor that I am afraid of your threats, but only as a matter of courtesy so that good sense and reason may prevail in you and your advisors and

May stop using your language of threat against me and my firm, and

You will not send any more mail to me,

 

nor your advisors will send, and any mail coming from you or your advisors will go to the junk mail.

With Best Regards,

Bose.

Boselaw

 

 

 

  1. Last but not the least- with the great support and enthusiasm instilled in me by the Human Rights’ activists in Mumbai, I have made up my mind and decided to return to Dubai. I am not scared about arrest or any other actions. After depositing the amount and coming with clean hands, it would be definitely expected from the judiciary in Dubai that I must be given a fair hearing. Now since I am out of Dubai and I am in my own country in India, there is no reason for me to place my money in jeopardy. Usually, people who abscond after committing a crime do not return. I am not only returning and facing the trial, but I am putting myself at stake by offering to deposit the amount. Thus my person and my finances will be put to stake just for justice and for removing the stigma on me. This gesture would per se convince the judiciary that I am innocent and I should be given justice. The Human Rights group from Mumbai (India) who have given me courage, would also be monitoring the whole case and one or two volunteer lawyers from this group would be accompanying me. One Mr.Sanjeev G.Punalekar, is a Human Rights activist and edits a newspaper named “Civil Liberties”. He has also fought various litigations against Government of India. You may find his name and details by searching internet through www.google.com. He was accompanying me and appearing for me even in Australia. His contact details are furnished here below.

Mr. Sanjeev G.Punalekar,  Advocate, High Court,  315, Birya House,  265, Perin Nariman Street,    Bazar Gate, Fort,   Mumbai – 400 001.(India).  Mobile no. – 0091-9820095814

 

Yours truly

 

Dayal Mansukhani

 

 

IN THE BAR COUNCIL OF U.A.E AT ABU DHABI

 

PETITION NO.                 OF 2006

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani                                     ]

Having his permanent address at                           ]

19, Malkani Mahal, Dr. A. B. Road,                     ]

Worli, Mumbai 400 030.                                                ] Petitioner

 

Versus

1        Dar AL- Adalah                                 ]

Advocates& legal Consultants Al                          ]

Maktoum Road, 261, Al Qaz Bldg, 4th floor,        ]

Flat # 402 P.O.Box 15878,Dubai -UAE.              ]

 

2  Mr. K.K.Sarachandra Bose Dubai (U.A.E.)       ]

 

]  Respondents



 

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP:-

 

THE HUMBLE PETITION ON BEHALF

OF THE PETITIONER ABOVENAMED

 

27              I am a Citizen of India having his address at as stated above in the cause title of the petition. The respondents are Legal Practitioners at relevant time engaged by the petitioner. The petitioner is a Businessmen and he was running his business from Dubai, UAE for around 25 years. The petitioner has traded and carried out business in Transportation, Textile trading, Finance etc. the petitioner has financed many individual and organization in Dubai. The petitioner has a good reputation in Dubai trade circle as he is very successful businessman. Though the petitioner has many friends in Dubai business class he has also attracted some enemies due to business competition.

28              I am forwarding this complaint to you by way of this complaint regarding legal proceeding to be taken against respondents firm and its local partners on account of serious loss and injury caused to me by Mr. K.K.Sarachandra Bose -a lawyer from respondents No. 1 firm.

29              I am enclosing various notices issued to the respondents in support of my present complaint i.e.      A notice issued by me to Mr. K. K. Sarachandra Bose, 2)      A reply received from Mr. K.K. Sarachandra Bose. I repeat and reiterate what has been stated in my notice. I wish to state that Mr. Bose is a lawyer and the final responsibility of his actions is that of your firm and its local partners. If I finally win the damage suit against your firm it will bring disrepute to your firm and its local partners.

30              I say that So far I was dealing with Mr. Bose who has made various wrong promises and misrepresentations to me. However the fact remains that the fees were received by Mr. Bose on behalf of respondent No. 1  law firm and Mr. Bose is responsible to me in his capacity as a part of respondent No. 1 law firm.

31              I file this complaint for canceling the license to practice; it will should affect both the respondents’ law firm and will not affect Mr. Bose, alone. Respondent No. 2 joined respondent No. 1 firm, the documents speak for themselves. Mr. Bose has been making a number of claims which include a statement that his refusal to hand over documents to me was based upon the decision of senior attorneys from respondent NO. 1  firm. Thus for his own incorrect and wrong and probably ill motivated decisions he is placing the blame 1st respondent and is bringing disrepute to respondent No. 1.

32              I was in Dubai for 25 years. I enjoyed the life over there. I owe a lot to UAE. That is why the whole approach of Mr. Bose hurts me. I am finding it difficult to digest a situation where innocent local partners of legal firm are exposed to losses due to actions of Mr. Bose. I have already suffered when I trusted him. Respondent’s local partners have placed much more trust in Mr. Bose; naturally the losses that would suffer are bound to be very high.

33              I am confident that if Mr. Bose had previously placed the truth before 1st respondents the matter would have been solved long back. He has either suppressed the truth or distorted the fact that is why he seems to be defiant while replying to my notice as he is sure that respondent’s No. 1 may not act on my complaint. And the respondent NO. 1 being the partner of respondent No. 2 is jointly and equally liable for action in this matter.

34              I am a businessman and not a lawyer. Hence there might have been language defects in my previous communications. However this would not change the substances of my complaint. If some of the sentimental outbursts are ignored, the correspondence would clearly show that:-

35              1)      I was in constant touch with Mr. Bose. However instead of giving specific reply, he was always giving me evasive answers.

2)      I provided him with all documents. He also knew that any extra documents required by him would be readily available on website.

3)      There was no problem about prompt payments made to him.

4)      I always dealt with him and never disturbed the local partners.

5)      Mr. Bose did not inform the facts to me in time. He was negligent and insensitive for the reasons best known to him.

6)      As a client, I could have taken steps to protect my interest by coming over to Dubai. I was in Australia during 2002 to 2006 and I had specifically asked Mr. Bose to advise me whenever my presence was required. Way back in July 03, I wrote to him. As Mr. Bose was hesitant to file criminal complaint against the accountant appointed by the court, I expressed my willingness to complete the job myself. However Mr. Bose discouraged me stating that there was a threat of arrest. This was a lie. As an appeal was filed on my behalf against an adverse order, there was no question of inclusion of my name on the websites of police authorities showing the names of persons against whom there were pending arrest warrants. You may yourself verify this factual position so that it will be known to you that Mr. Bose was intentionally misguiding me.7)      When Mr. Bose misled me, discouraged me from coming to UAE, committed a breach of trust, colluded with my opponent and finally destroyed all my legal cases, he was all along keeping you in the dark.

10      I say that millions of ex-patriates are working in UAE. They have faith in the legal system of UAE. This faith will be shattered if this episode is known to people. This will tarnish the image of the whole country and will bring disrepute to the whole system. In that case your law firm will have to face action in the hands of the authorities of UAE as well.

11               When I was trying to convince Mr. Bose that a case should be filed against the Accountant, he demanded on-account/advance of Dirhams 50,000/-.  I pointed out that I am ready to pay the same and would in fact pay more than 1,00,000/- in due course, he simply stopped responding to my pleas to file the case. The respondent NO. 1 was aware and did appreciate that this particular litigation was the outcome of a larger crime. This matter is related to a big fraud that took place in Standard Chartered Bank in Dubai involving million of Dirhams and ruining thousands of lives of innocent businessmen in Dubai. I am attaching herewith a copy of the notice send by me to Standard Chartered bank which is self explanatory.

12      The respondent No. 2 is  an Indian citizen who has been in the legal profession in United Arab Emirates for more than two decades. Since last six years he was attending to various legal cases which are associated with my business concerns in Dubai. Previously he was a part of another firm viz. Galadari Associates. When he left the said firm and joined another firm our legal cases were shifted to his new firm of which respondent NO. 1 is a partner. Thus the primary
responsibility to look after our cases was personally of respondent NO. 2 and we were basically dealing with him. We always trusted Mr. Bose as he was Indian citizen and co-operated with him.

 

13       As I hail from India and as I have certain difficulty in written Arabic, I had to seek advice in legal matters in view of the fact that legal proceedings in UAE are conducted in Arabic. Respondents firm, have a local partner and they also have, necessary translating facility between Arabic and English. As he hails from India which facilitated easy communication with him in Hindi, we had been trusting him and confiding in him from very beginning.

 

14  As regards fee structure, I have always readily complied with respondents requests. Various correspondences and emails exchanged between us bear testimony to the fact that on our part there was no lacunae due to which their service to us should have been affected. Unfortunately, confidence placed by us and the co-operation extended by us were not reciprocated by them. Instead, the respondent  have indulged into various practices which amount to not only dereliction of duty but also to breach of trust and criminal negligence. We have realized that respondents have absolutely no knowledge about written Arabic and they were fully dependent on paid employees doing this job for them. Hence they had to engage outside employees and this must have created serious communication gaps thereby impairing our legal cases. Therefore while canvassing our client account they have clearly misrepresented to us and have given us tall promises which respondents could not and did not keep up. So long as we were in Dubai till 2002, we were in a position to keep in touch with respondents and exercise some check and control in respect of our cases. However as respondents knew, we left for Australia in the year 2002 and thereafter in the next four years period, we were busy with our business activities in Australia. During this period, we had to fully rely upon respondent’s long distance communications with the belief and confidence that they would take care of our interest. Respondents are aware of the fact that as per law relating to legal profession and code of ethics
applicable to lawyers, a lawyer is expected to exercise every due diligence even in the absence of his client and to ensure that the litigation does not suffer due to any communication gap. A lawyer is duty bound to properly represent his client and to see that every submission and argument is properly tendered and every correspondence is properly made so as to maximize the chances of success. When a lawyer confronts any difficulty, he is required to specifically and clearly advice his client so that the client can take remedial measures. Secondly, a lawyer is expected to carry out every lawful instruction from the client honestly and truthfully. A lawyer is required to act with ordinary diligence and it is expected of him that he must take timely decision with
regard to various matters by making optimum use of his own conscience and judgment. A lawyer is also duty bound that he should not defy the client’s
instructions particularly when such instructions are of material relevance to the evidence in led any case. Whenever respondents sent us any e-mail, we replied the same by return e-mail.  However, they kept us in dark. Even in instances where there were adverse developments, they failed to inform us on the same day.   Only when we contacted them, we were given intimation about the happening.

15  Unfortunately, in the litigation relating to Mr. Raj Bernard and of his firm Besco, we find that the litigation was completely mis-handled by respondents. Respondents had acted in a reckless and careless manner and have failed and neglected to protect my interest. A favorable judgment obtained by me was reversed at my back and by taking advantage of various deficiencies at the appellate stage proceedings which occurred only and only because of your criminal negligence and probably your collusion with the opposite party.  Mr. Raj owed huge dues to me. Financial irregularities were committed by him and in fact when litigation was going on in my presence, Mr. Raj was evading the same and he did not even participate in the proceedings. The court at Dubai however, went on giving opportunities to him for a long period of 3 ½ years. However, while deciding the litigation in my absence, the matters were extraordinarily expedited which was not even opposed by respondents. They were also aware that this legal case had a background history connected with the episode of Standard Chartered Bank and final outcome of this case was closely linked to every step to be taken by them with regard to my dispute with Standard Chartered Bank. Therefore when a favorable judgment was received by me against Mr. Raj, I was very happy that I would be in a position to take up pending issues against Standard Chartered Bank. However my hopes were shattered. In my absence when Mr. Raj sought to reopen the case, but respondents did not even resist the same properly. Subsequent case filed against me by Mr. Raj succeeded and decree was awarded against me.
When Mr. Raj attempted to reopen the previous case, the same should have been forcefully opposed. In this connection respondents knew that I had made available to them every evidence with particular reference to the episode relating to Standard Chartered Bank. I had properly kept all my accounts and chronology of all events was available with them personally. It was only a matter of properly explaining the true facts to the
court of law. I had also entrusted complete and full authority in respondents and empowered them to represent myself any all these litigations so that my presence would not be required. I had furnished to them the fact of all Cheques, correspondences, auditors’ report, previous complaints, and correspondences with Standard Chartered Bank and supplied them with detailed notes made by me in the matter.

16  On my personal website all documentary evidence was displayed and respondents were personally aware of the same. They could have referred to any evidence any time, if at all at any particular point of time they found any difficulty. Secondly, I had been communicating with them over email and it was not difficult for them to get in touch with me over email or on phone.  Last but not the least, our contract was very much clear wherein respondents  were assured a very good return for their work and this incentive per se was sufficient for them to independently conduct the matter in an effective way. Any single payment of their charges in the past was not delayed by me. In addition, fee structure was incentive based so far as respondents were entitled to share of recovery from out of the decree to be obtained. In this background, it was not unusual for me to expect that respondent would fight out litigation vehemently and forcefully by representing my interest properly. Unfortunately, they did not do so. The case was successfully reopened by Mr. Raj. The matter did not stop here. Mr. Raj succeeded in quashing the decree within a short period. In addition a decree was awarded against me.

17  This was shocking. The whole
episode looked like a stage managed drama. For any person with ordinary wisdom it is very difficult to find out as to how reopening of judicial decision was done with such quickness when decision was made in the first place after a very long indulgence given to Mr. Raj. I was in Australia and due to my business problems I was unable to return to Dubai. Taking advantage of this position, various adverse rulings were obtained against me. On my part I expressed myself and spoke out my mind very clearly. With particular reference to the auditors’ report about various transactions. It was necessary for respondents to rely upon such substantial issues such as auditors’ report and ensure that attention is attracted only to genuine issues of substance.  They should have ensured that Mr. Raj did not succeed in misleading the court only on technical grounds. I had past business relation with Mr. Raj and the entire gamut of transactions was routed through bank accounts. Every transaction was reflected in bank account and there was hardly any scope for oral submissions. It is a cardinal principle of law that
written word has more weight than a word of mouth. The documents speak for themselves. When I was absent on the scene and when there was already a ruling from the court of law in my favour, it was their duty to stress the documentary part of evidence properly. This consisted of two parts. Firstly, respondents should have properly invited court’s attention to the documents on record. Secondly, if there was need to bring fresh documents on record, respondents should have obtained leave of
the court for the same.
The criminal negligence on respondent’s part assumes importance on account of your omission to take proper benefit of the courts directives of appointing accountant to submit report. When the court appoints its agency/ officer for the purpose of fact finding, both the sides get an equal opportunity to bring proper documents before the court. It was respondent’s duty to submit every piece of paper to the accountant and thereafter see to it that every vital piece of paper is duly incorporated in the financial report submitted by the auditor to the court. Even though I am a layman, I am aware of the practices in the court and about principles of natural justice whereby documents
and written submissions made by one party are invariably made available to the opposite party. The submission of accountant’s report is not one day’s job. It is a long drawn process wherein both the parties are given due opportunity to examine each
others documents and arguments and to make further arguments, rejoinder and supplementary submissions. Therefore respondents ought to have properly checked that every document from our side is taken on record. Simultaneously they should have also thoroughly checked the documents tendered by Mr. Raj to ensured that any concocted or manipulated documents are not allowed to be taken on record With regard to documentary evidence, we had an upper hand and there was every likelihood that the opposite side would try to mislead the court by submitting either concocted documents or by tendering incorrect interpretation of evidence. Respondents should have been extremely alert and vigilant on this front. However, they have adopted a very casual and non-serious attitude. While the opposite side and its lawyers were fighting litigation with vehemence and vigor and were not leaving any stone unturned to get
better judgment, respondents have adopted an attitude of complacence. In fact I clearly apprehend that this not an attitude of complacence but an attitude of complicity. Respondents did not defend our interest at all. They failed to point out the lacunae of the opposite side, documentary evidence as well as interpretation of such evidence.
 It is also extremely doubtful whether respondents really submitted documentary evidence that I had furnished to them. Throughout this period they did not even try seriously to involve me in any of the processes. If at all there were any genuine difficulties, they should have got in touch with me. The damages caused to me were known to me only later. When the court pronounced its judgment respondents ought to have raised certain basic
issues in relation to the accountant’s report. They failed on this front as well. When I took up the issues with them, they tried to defend themselves by stating that they had recorded objections verbally. As a lawyer, respondents are well aware of the fact that in any court proceedings there is always a scope to submit written arguments. Secondly, while on the date of pronouncement of judgment, the heat and anxiety in the court may create difficulties in properly recording the oral argument we fail to understand as to why written arguments were not submitted to the accountant. Secondly, if at all
written arguments were not accepted at the time of pronouncing judgment and if they really observed various lacunae in the accountant’s report, respondents could have submitted a review application forthwith through which certain written arguments could have been brought on record. When I was totally disillusioned about the role played by the accountant, I insisted that there is something fishy about the role and insisted initiation of proceedings against the accountant. Respondents did not take any steps. I made it clear to respondents that we need to take further steps to repudiate the report of the accountant and to bring out its non-acceptability as evidence before the court of law. When the report very much adversely affected us, there was no option but to challenge the same and to demand action against the accountants if there were any maladies. However for the reasons best known to respondents, they chose to defend the accountants. It is still not clear to me as to how they chose to defend the accountants when the accountant’s report was the basis of our setback in the legal case. Unless and until we legitimately reverse this report, it was not possible for us to reverse the verdict to the court of law. Repudiating the report required that the deficiency in the report should be first highlighted so that fresh evidence and fresh interpretations would be brought on record. Unfortunately, respondents adopted a very dogmatic and negative approach towards my
suggestion. As I was respondent’s client, they were duty bound to properly consider my suggestion and instructions. If they differed with my suggestions, they ought to have explained the same in writing and given me an option to engage another lawyer. Instead respondent adopted various techniques to evade action against the accountants. This was unbecoming of a lawyer. Already we were in Australia and we had our own business difficulties due to which time at our disposal was too short. We were
struggling to consolidate our various matters. In this situation, when time was running out, respondents should have stuck to their professional locus and facilitated prompt and quick action in our litigation / dispute. The accountant’s report had many irregularities. The letter from Besco on record acknowledged the receipts of payments.  Bank statements were also on record.   It was an admitted position that in Criminal Proceedings initiated by me, Raj had accepted the debt and has in fact sought lenience by offering to make payment over a period of time.  He had never claimed that any amounts are owed by me.  If these facts were properly explained to the accountant, there was no question of accountant giving any erroneous report. Even in the likely event of any intentional lapses on the part of the accountant, respondent’s timely and vigilant action would have created apprehensions for the Accountant.
The respondents had not handled the matter with due diligence. Instead they went on tossing back our queries and when we demanded papers and proceedings from them, they did
not even make the same available. As per laws applicable to lawyers, a lawyer is required to return all proofs and papers to his clients so that the client can seek relief from alternate sources. If a lawyer does not implement or execute his client’s instructions and at the same time holds up papers with him, thereby making it impossible for the client to go to another lawyer as well, it is an offence punishable
under law. Throughout this period, respondent’s intentions were to stop legal remedies against Mr. Raj on some or the other pretext. Even till recently, when we requested them to make available to us soft copies of the various documents that are available in their computer, they declined our request without satisfactory explanation. It is an admitted position
that respondents are not having any Arabic knowledge and they are relying on the papers translated from Arabic to English. Therefore in an era of technology, it is ridiculous that they claim non-availability of soft copies of the papers. Since respondents were actively involved in getting papers translated from Arabic to English and from English to Arabic, it would have been readily possible for them to forward soft copies of papers to us. If all soft copies were not available at least all available soft copies should have been given to us with list of those specific papers where soft copies are not available. Even in such cases, hard copies should have been provided to us. They did not provide us with any copies. Instead they went on giving evasive replies and at one point of time stated that we
should obtain the papers from the court of law. During these communications, when respondents informed us orally that hard copies in Arabic could be collected, we clarified to them that as they had got these papers translated into English, the soft copies could be forwarded to us so that we can properly study the matter and give instructions to the counsel conducting the matter in Australia. We pointed out that they must be having soft copies in your computer. However, they still did not provide us with the soft copies. This non-cooperative attitude on his part has convinced us that the judgment obtained at our back against our interest was obtained by collusion and conspiracy between him and Mr. Raj. Therefore, we have decided to initiate stringent legal action against the respondent.

18  The petitioner has not filed any other petition or challenged the orders in any other court of law.

19  The delay in taking out this petition be condoned as the petitioner being held up in Australia for his Business purpose and presently residing in India, he could not due to legal knowledge file this petition earlier.

20  The petitioner is paying the court fees of DHR.___________ as fixed court fees.

21  The petitioner has no alternate and efficacious alternate remedy available and reliefs sought in the present petition will be suffice to do full and final justice between the parties.

22  The petitioner submits that there is substantial and crucial issues regarding law are involved in the above matter.

23  The petitioner craves leave to refer and rely upon the compilation of documents in support of this petition.

24  The petitioner shall rely upon the compilation of documents in support of this case separately.

25  The petitioner therefore prays that-

 

f)      That after going through the legalities and proprieties in the above matte records and proceedings from the lower court be called for.

g)     That after going through the records and proceedings in the above matter and hearing the parties this Hon’ble court be pleased to deal with the respondents in accordance with law.

h)    That any other just and appropriate order as this court thinks fit and proper may be passed.

i)       That cost of this petition be provided with.

 

 

Dated –

Place

Petitioner.

 

 

IN THE COURT OF FEDRAL SUPREME COURT OF CASSATION IN ABU DHABI

 

REVIEW/ CURATIVE PETITION NO.                 OF 2006

IN

APPEAL NO.                     OF

IN

PETITION NO.                   OF

 

Mr. Dayal H. Mansukhani                                    ]

Having his permanent address at                         ]

19, Malkani Mahal, Dr. A. B. Road,                      ]

Worli, Mumbai 400 030.                                                ] Petitioner

 

Versus

 

1     HARIS & ASSOCIATES                                           ]

Auditors & Business Consultants                                  ]

P.O.Box No. 31367,                                                        ]

Dubai, U.A.E.                                                                 ]

Email: info@ harisaudit.com                                          ]

 

2     Raj Bernard of BESCO                                            ]Resp

 

 

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP :-

 

THE HUMBLE PETITION ON BEHALF

OF THE PETITIONER ABOVENAMED

 

36          The petitioner is a Citizen of India having his address at as stated above in the cause title of the petition. The respondent is  authorized auditor and the Dubai court accepts his auditing report. The respondent No. 2 is a manager of BESCO a registered company under the UAE law. The petitioner is a Businessmen and he was running his business from Dubai, UAE for around 25 years. The petitioner has traded and carried out business in Transportation, Textile trading, Finance etc. the petitioner has financed many individual and organization in Dubai. The petitioner has a good reputation in Dubai trade circle as he is very successful businessman. Though the petitioner has many friends in Dubai business class he has also attracted some enemies due to business competition.

37          The petitioner has financed respondents NO. 2 around 3 million Dhr. For different years, this finance was spread upto 2 years. All this financial transaction was by cheque payment. The respondent NO. 2 for discharging his legal debt issued some post dated Cheques in favour of the petitioner, a few Cheques were drawn on Standard Chartered Bank to which I have separately sued. Interestingly some Cheques were having endorsement from the said Bank “we guarantee that this cheque is good for payment on 15.10.98” believing the endorsement the petitioner agreed to accept post dated Cheques. Hereto annexed and Marked Exhibit A  collectively are the cheques issued by the 4th respondent MR. Raj Bernard to discharge his legal debt.

38          To the shock and surprise of the petitioner all these cheque were dishonored by the Standard Chartered Bank. Initially the bank gave vague reasons for dishonoring the cheque but subsequently they stated in their memo that there are alteration in the Cheques as far as date are concerned. The petitioner challenged that contention the matter was highly contested and ultimately it was held that the bank officers were responsible for the alteration if any and they have endorsed their signature at the place of alteration. Hereto annexed and marked Exhibit B is the copy of the Forensic Lab report issued  dated ___________.

39          The petitioner submits that once it was made clear that I was not responsible for the alteration in the cheques I should be given the cheque amount but surprisingly the bank and public prosecutor conspiring with all the above respondents delayed that matter and when ultimately when the cheque was handed over to me the time for presenting the same lapsed. This way the public prosecutor and Dubai police is also responsible for causing delay under the guise of investigation. I reserve my right to sue them as and when situation permits. Thereafter the petitioner went to the central bank for help – UAE. They could not help me down below is their reply. Then he also went to London for justice, but there also the bank of ombudsman took my case but after one month – sent negative response, England bank has big power – and big relations. uk – bank of ombudsman could not help me and asked me to go to Dubai so the petitioner went to Dubai central bank and also to the Indian consulate, in Dubai. But they also could do nothing to help an Indian in Dubai. i am attaching all these evidences.

 

 

 

40          The brief facts about the lis between the petitioner and the respondents is as under:-

41          The petitioner went to Dubai in around may 1977. he is a businessman his business in Dubai includes-Transportation, Cars selling and buying, Man Power supply- Whole sale Textile, and Financial support/Investor. The respondent No. 2      BESCO- the respondent no. 2  It’s a Dubai Govt. Undertaking run by Dubai Labor Ministry. One Al Mullah is the Owner, who is in Business of Supplying Manpower from Asia and particularly from India. The          Dubai Dry Dock is another such company managed by the Dubai Government. One RAJ BERNARD present respondent NO. 2 is an Employee of BESCO holding a Managerial Capacity in BESCO. The petitioner  financed BESCO since 1995 to 1997 Dec. I financed around 3 Million Dhm. To this company. Out of which I recovered around 1.8 Million and the outstanding is around 1.2 Millions.    In December 1997 we have entered into New Agreement and BESCO issued me through Mr. Raj Bernard New Cheques for Balance amount. The balance amount was divided into 12 different Cheques, payable in installment.

42          To the shock of the petitioner All these 12 Cheques were returned dishonored at different time and period. Besides these 12 Cheques 2 other Cheques were issued drawn at Standard Chartered Bank with Bank guarantee, these two Cheques were also returned dishonored. ( all during the 8 months period)        All these Cheques were signed by Mr. Raj Bernard on behalf of BESCO.

43          The petitioner initially when the Cheques were returned dishonored  warn Mr. Raj Bernard on telephone. Then he filed a criminal case in Feb 1998 in Dubai Court. For 2.23. Lakhs Dhm. The amount being of two Cheques. ( pending this case my other Cheques were also returned dishonored)  as the petitioner was made to believe In UAE according to its law the place of issuance consideration is the place of filing of criminal complaint irrespective of the place of issuance of Cheques) Accordingly the petitioner has  filed complained in Dubai, Sharjah, and Ajman.  Against Mr. Raj Bernard.

44          All these cases proceeded simultaneously in different courts.The Dubai Court case concluded in July 1998. The court ordered and directed Mr. Bernard to pay me Cheques amount and he was fined for 2000 Dhm. This money was deposited in court which was afterward on given to petitioner. In sharjah court the court directed the case to be transferred to Dubai court.  Similarly the Ajman court also taken similar view.

45          In mean time the accused was put in police custody for around 10 days. Finally the Dubai court decided the cases so transferred to it and dismissed the case holding that I should file civil case. The petitioner filed civil case in 2000, being case No. 183 of 2000 the civil court ordered in my favour around 6 lakhs dhr. Aggrieved by this ordered we both went in to appeal. The appellate court dismissed my appeal and allowed the appeal of Mr. Raj Bernard.

46          Then subsequently the petitioner went to  Supreme Court in 2005 his appeal in Supreme Court was also dismissed. As the the Hon’ble supreme court relied upon the repost of the court appointed accountant who has submitted wrong report for reason know best to him. The petitioner instructed his lawyer Mr. Bose to file civil case who following my instruction transferred theses cases to local lawyer.Thus the petitioner filed civil case against Raj Bernard.

47          The petitioner submits that In the mean time out of the two Cheques drawn at Standard Chartered Bank one Cheque returned dishonored, despite Bank assurance to Good Cheques. The Cheques returned with the remark refer to drawer. When I confronted with the officers of the Standard Chartered bank they told me that bank Guarantee Cheques have been discontinued, and there is some fraud in issuance of this Cheques some Bank Officers might be involved. Subsequently the Standard Chartered bank dismissed its employee who has made endorsement on the Cheques.the petitioner again represented the Cheques with the Bank this time the remark was alteration in Cheques. On the third time of my presenting the Cheques the Bank remarked alteration in date.

48          The petitioner  instructed his  lawyer to issue notice to Standard Chartered Bank, he accordingly sent notice on 2/8/98 ( Lawyer All Kaleen )    On 5/8/98 the Standard Chartered Bank filed complaint against the petitioner with Dubai Police regarding Cheques No. 404976 ironically this Cheques was never presented with the Bank)

49          The police sent the said Cheques with the Forensic lab Dubai for investigation. Even in this matter thee is no reference to Cheques No. 4049776. The  lab submitted the report that the Cheques looks as of 1996, there were three dated on the Cheques put by Mr. Raj Bernard and two Bank officers. The Dubai Police sent the matter to court.The court fined the petitioner  2000 Dhm. The petitioner paid the penalty and demanded the Cheques back.

50          The petitioner submits that Since the Cheques was not returned to me I went to appeal court, the appeal court dismissed my appeal on fine part but directed to return the Cheques to me.    Against this order both myself and Mr. Raj Bernard went to Supreme Court where the humble court continued my fine but ordered to return the Cheques back to me.  In the mean time the other Cheques being chq No. 4049776 dated Oct 15 1998 matured and I presented the Cheques in Mashreq Bank, surprisingly the Standard Chartered bank without returning the Cheques to my Banker sent the Cheques to Dubai Police, which was informed to me by Mashrewq Bank.     The Dubai Police ordered me o furnish bail Bond. And Cheques was sent to Forensic Lab. In Feb 1999 the Forensic lab sent its report that there is no illegal alteration on the said Cheques. The public prosecutor again sent the said Cheques for reexamination to the laboratory.  The second report of the Forensic lab again concluded that thee is no illegal alteration on the Cheques.         The public prosecutor directed the police to drop the case against me and return the Cheques to me. The Cheques was returned to me on 28/4/1999.  I presented the Cheques with the Banker on 29/4/99 the same returned dishonored on the ground that the cheque was out of limitation. Thereafter I went to London before the Banking Ombudsman of Standard Chartered bank. I registered the complaint in around 2000 Sept. in Oct 2000 the Ombudsman rejected my complaint saying they do not have jurisdiction over the Dubai Bank.          I have not filed any legal proceedings for the recovery of the cheque amount.  In Jan 1999 Mr. Raj Bernard filed one case against me for recovery of 1 Million Dhm. The court ordered Mr. Raj Bernard to submit account with the court. He could not submit the account for nearly two years and as such the case was dismissed with costs.   Raj Bernard went to appeal against the dismissal order, the appeal court appointed 3rd auditor for taking account, incidentally I was also in Dubai during that period so I requested my lawyer to produce account from my side to the auditor, I also personally visited the office of the auditor but he did not entertain me saying he do not have time.    Since Aug 2002 I did not went to Dubai again. The appeal was allowed and court directed me to pay Mr. Raj Bernard 1.1 Million Dhm. My lawyer could not produce counter account form my side. As the audit done by the courts auditor was incorrect I directed my lawyer to file case against the auditor for submitting wrong account/audit.          My lawyer did not file the case nor did he return me the case papers so I could file a case personally. There are many email correspondence between me and my lawyer.  I did not pay the 1.1 million and went to appeal in Supreme Court, the appeal was dismissed.

51          The petitioner have already issued appropriate notices not only to the court appointed accountant the respondent NO. 1  who is also an culprit in the matter for not submitting the correct and unbiased report but also to my own legal advisor. I have also addressed appropriate communications to your previous local partner and I shall be marking a copy of the same to his new partner. It would be petitioners endeavour before the court of law to establish that the court -appointed accountant acted in a manner prejudicial to justice and he was negligent and prejudiced in his whole approach. The errors made be him in analysing the data are enormous. The petitioner submits that the accountant’s report is based on not only inadequate information but also incorrect information supplied by my lawyer. Legally, this is treated as perjury and contempt of court. Whatever may be the reasons for the accountant to give adverse report against the petitioner, the consequence of reopening of cases would have to be suffered by the respondents not only in terms of legal cases but also in terms of penal actions and punishments from courts of law. It is already on record that in criminal proceedings initiated by the petitioner, the respondents NO. 2 officer MR. Raj Bernard has admitted his liability before the court of law in Dubai, Sharjah and Ajman and he was making mainly two pleas viz. i) he needed time to settle, ii) he  wanted me to resort to civil remedy. The above two statements from him  are part of records and accountant’s report in any manner will not erase the past records. Maybe because the petitioner  was abroad and because of communication gap or maybe because of errors on the part of petitioners previous lawyer, a holistic picture was not available to the court of law. However, if  now the petitioner bring these facts on record and at the same time offer to deposit the amount, the chances of getting cases reopened are bright.