K.K.BOSS - DUBAI

 

बीमारी HINDU LAYERS DUBAI K.K.BOSS

My lawyers K.K. Boss email From Click http://www.needjustice.net/file20.doc

 Mr. Dayal, you and your family travel on the right path).I will not have any hesitation to file a case against you in Australia  With Best Regards, Bose.Boselaw (PARTNER) Dar Al-Adalah  K-K SENT SON P. P.

 

DUBAI COURT CHECK http://www.needjustice.net/index1.html

  

AdUBAI  DAYAL2006 NoticeCOURT& 4/32016    CLICK DUBAI Notice + needjustice_Case_10 + CLICK www.needjustice.net/file35.doc

DAYAL QLD  CLICK 2b_Affidavit

GANDHI KILLS 1948 MUMS STOP MAILS JUSTICE LAWYERS BORN BORN DAYAL11/12/1948 SAME GANDHI

DAYAL GOLD COAST + CLICK www.needjustice.net/d380.html

Website LINK DAYAL GOLD www.loungetec.com + DAYAL4 LAW FIRM PROJECT LINK: Click Here

 

Website DAYAL GOLD www.loungetec.com + DAYAL4PROJECT LINK: Click Here

JOBS CLICK  http://www.needjustice.net/job/

DUBAI ALL JOBS10KTO25K  CLICKhttp://www.needjustice.net/file32.docx

DAYAL HINDU NOT CONVERTED UAE MUSLIMS LAW AUSTRALIA CHRISTIAN WHY LAWCLICKwww.needjustice.net/hm

 

K.K. BOSE EMAIL FILE20  + FILE41 BOSE ACCOUNT DETAILS AED20000++MORE  

DUBAI COURT DISMISSED. A 903/98 &  557/98. WHY FRAUD

 

 

mr bose and dayal agreement page 2mr bose and dayal agreement

My lawyers K.K. Bose email From Click http://www.needjustice.net/file20.doc

 Mr. Dayal, you and your family travel on the right path).I will not have any hesitation to file a case against you in Australia  With Best Regards, Bose.Boselaw (PARTNER) Dar Al-Adalah  K-K SENT SON P. P.

With K K Bose I was in constant touch until 2006, 2007 and in 2008 also I had sent hi notices. In 2005 and before I was in frequent touch with him. Whatever unjust he has done to my cases has not got time barred. I have all his emails. If I file police case then all the cases can be easily re-opened

From: boselaw@hotmail.com

Mar To Jun 2003 &10 Mar+ July 14, 2006

 

Dear Mr. Dayal Mansukhani,  10 Mar+ July 14, 2006   In respect to SCB original cheques, we have filed application to the court to bring the file from the archives and get us the original cheques and till date  the file has not come to the judge. We are following the matter and gat back to you in due course.

 

In respect to your Bombay cases, I had handed over all the original cheques to the Bombay lawyer

MRS. VANDANA D. JAISINGH  ADVOCATE & NOTARY and she served notice to all the parties. She had at that time informed me that all the cases were time barred as per the laws applicable in India.

 

24 Apr 2003    The execution and arrest warrant is in the case of Besco-Dayal.

I have good experience and a big name in the market. you had absolute faith in me and that you were leaving for Australia etc.
all your cases were in a mess. I will not handle any more cases for your Please take all your cases and entrust to another lawyer.
 
Original Message Follows----
From: "Pooja Mansukhani" <poojamans@hotmail.com>
To: boselaw@hotmail.com, aladalah@emirates.net.ae
Subject: urgent - reply me soon -
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2003 13:58:23 +0000
Mr Bose

I have other 3 more lawyers – whom I shall approach – Mr Ahmed Hashim who knows about the 557/98 case – and the other is Mr Naseer al Jaroodi – he knows hindi as well and had won a case for me of dhs 500,000/, he is a clever one too. And he has Mr Mohan who is from your kerala as well, knows hindi, Al Khaleej Advocates & legal consultants knows hindi

All the below mentioned cases were filed after the 2nd august 1998 against the SBC –except the CBI case. All these cases are related with Raj and SCB. All these cases have been followed up by you as you are my lawyer.

all 6 cases details from Lower court till the Supreme Court – all the details are with you.

Case no. 557/98, (454/02) case no 658/2001, case no. 183/2000, case no 1247/2003, case no CBI 827/02 (467/02) and case no 157/2000

From: boselaw@hotmail.com 29 Apr 2003

The power of attorney that you issued to me was only for those cases entrusted to me, and I am not paid any money for acting as your attorney, and I have no wish to remain your attorney anymore. There is no law to compel me to act for you on your command. All other issues raised by you were answered several times by me, and I do not want to repeat again and again.

What you have to do is to appoint another lawyerYou cannot go on publishing tarnishing remarks against a system in which I am also working.

 

From: poojamans@hotmail.com   Dayal comments:

the casealready closed / dismissed. It got reopened and they won it.  Why my money, this amount – more than dhs 1,000,000/ is – a small amount? It is not only dhs 1,000,000/ but my reputation and my health, has it no value?    From: boselaw@hotmail.com

In the case of Dayal-Besco, the court of appeal has decided not to hear any more witnesses and has passed judgment in your favour and ordered Raj and Besco jointly and severally to pay you a sum of Dh.618,383/- plus costs. In my opinion, this is a good judment. Besco may appeal against this judgment.

What do you think – that dhs 600,000/ that they have to pay me – while the claim was for 10,000,000/ - -

From: poojamans@hotmail.com

 

Do you think they will pay this also? Their lawyer is so smart that when he could win the lost / dismissed case – he can even prove this case to be wrong.

Besco has submitted the Expert report and judgment in the case

of Besco-Dayal in Dayal-Besco appeal and requested the court to dismiss the case

stating that both are one matter. We are fighting the case in the appeal court.

From: boselaw@hotmail.com  24 Mar 2003 From: boselaw@hotmail.com  24 Mar 2003

In the case of Besco-Dayal, the Supreme Court has passed its judgment confirming the Appeal court’s judgment and ordered you to pay the sum of Dh.1 million plus costs. Since this judgment is final, nothing more could be done in this case.

For you to come back to Dubai, no body will stop you provided you remit the amount to the execution court. And I am sure, this is not a big deal for you, as you told me earlier.

 

The court refused to give us time on the grounds that the case itself has taken long time. The court of cassation dismissed our objection and comments on the audit report and approved the report and upheld the appeal court's judgment. From: boselaw@hotmail.com  27 Mar 2003

A verbal objection noted in the minutes of the court is as good as written objection, and there is no difference between the two.

The court refused to give us time on the grounds that the case itself has taken long time. The court of cassation dismissed our objection and comments on the audit report and approved the report and upheld the appeal court's judgment.

I believe that the auditor's report is biased and is one sided. I think that you should file a criminal case against the auditor.if you want me to file the case, I will charge a

fee not less than Dh.50,000/- From: poojamans@hotmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DUBAI COURT CHECK http://www.needjustice.net/index1.html

DHAHI KHALFAN DUBAI COURT 223796 AED WHY DAYAL FAVOUR CHEQUE RE OPEN HISTORY?

 

 

 DUBAI CLICK www.needjustice.net/file35.doc

 

 

 

Case No: 577 of 1998, was dismissed.

Government of Dubai
Dubai Court of
First Instance
Behalf of His
Highness Sheikh Maktoum bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai
Public meeting
held on ethane at the Dubai Court of First Instance.
Under the chairmanship of
Mr. Justice: Fouad Mahmoud Amin Shalaby
The
membership of:
Mr.
Judge: Mohamed Hani
Mr.
Judge: Ghassan al-Shawa
And the presence of
Secretary: Abdullah Mohamed Ahmed
Issued
the following provision
In
Case No.: 577 of 1998 total commercial
Uploads
: Pisco International (LLC. LLC. M. M)
Against:
Dial Manso Khani
After reviewing
the documents and hearing oral argument and deliberation

PO 2 continued rule in the proceedings 557 \ 1998 total trade
Tthsal facts - it shows the view from the papers - in that the Prosecutor
Argued about the defendant to judge my appoint an expert to determine the amount of the loan
And the amounts calculated from the portable dry basin Dubai, Mashreq Bank and Habib
Chartz Bank and Standard Bank for the defendant and inventory checks in the possession of the defendant
And determining the amounts of additional own and then be obligated to pay additional amounts in addition to expenses
            She said her statement that, under an agreement concluded between them in the borrowed 23/07/1996
Of which $ 400,000 AED without Fouad and committed to remit installments of the amounts
Owed to it by the pool and Dubai Dry account with Mashreq Bank as collateral for the implementation of the obligation of restitution also handed over checks of the numbers 625347 to 625356 and
Sending it back once fully pay the entire loan Taking The total amounts received
Statement from both sides Safatty amount 1,544,599 AED, but he refused to re-team

 

P. 3 continued rule in the case 557 \ 1998 total trade
, Prompting a lawsuit to establish the above statement.
      Provided Taida portfolio documents turned a copy of:
Of the loan contract concluded between them in the 07/23/1996.
Messages issued from the Dubai Dry Docks, and several banks to transfer funds from their account
To the account of the defendant.
Payroll calculation and disclosure checks delivered to him.
Photo penal provisions.
      Such as a note guaranteed by the defendant and his defense based on the existence of
Financial transactions between them and the attached photocopies of several checks and accounting reports
    3/21/1999 session and ruled the court appointment of an expert accounting for the statement 'What is the amount
Delivered from the defendant to the plaintiff and the percentage and total amount paid by him to
Heya and checks issued by him and appropriate at the failure of this expert and Managing Director
To provide for his request of the parties a hearing on 15.5.2000 replaced rivalry

 

P. 4 continued rule in the case 557 \ 1998 total commercial
The court held
the sentencing hearing today, Deputy Prosecutor introduced and applied
To bring it back
to the pleadings and annexed documents, pay attention to him the court.
Since the
original clearance in humans and that the evidence of the alleged
And the right
of denied based on this that if the plaintiff did not provide the same reasons,
Documents
and data, it is considered to have failed to establish the right claimed by
And
his claim should be dismissed.

 

 


Since
it was obvious Prosecutor newspaper which reported her claim and a note
Defense
that it is not merely a word sending it as there is no evidence that it provided
Documents
does not indicate the fact contractual relations and the parties and the defendant Naqdha
Despite the
Court's response to request appointment of an expert, but it could not be directly due to the Tax Office
Closed
some time ago and then her claim to be non-support of fact and law
Rejection
due to bind with their expenses pursuant to Article 133 of the Criminal Procedure Law

The below mentioned agreement proves that BESCO was supplying man power to dubai dry dock. And BESCO gets the payment after 60 days. Since the labor should be paid every one month , Mr Raj took 400,000 cash from me and gave me PDC cheques  and said that Dubai Dry docks would transfer the money in to my account every month and I was deducting my installment amount and was paying the remaining amount. All the details  of the cheques and cash that I had given to him are mentioned below.

 

This document is the auditing report of Al Rubaie and co . he is n authorized auditor and the Dubai court accepts his auditing report. This report was done for me in 1998 , because on February 7 1998 Raj , wrote a letter to Dubai dry docks  to stop paying me and so all my cheques were bouncing from then on. I had submitted the below mentioned report to court in 1998. In UAE ,  charging interest is illegal and Raj had filed a wrong case on him making charges that I was charging interest on him. So I had submitted this report in the Dubai court

file11007

 

 

.

file11008

 

 

file11009

 

 

file11010

 

 

 

file11011

 

 

 

file11012

 

 

 

file11013

The court refused to give us time on the grounds that the case itself has taken long time. The court of cassation dismissed our objection and comments on the audit report and approved the report and upheld the appeal court's judgment. From: boselaw@hotmail.com  27 Mar 2003

A verbal objection noted in the minutes of the court is as good as written objection, and there is no difference between the two.

The court refused to give us time on the grounds that the case itself has taken long time. The court of cassation dismissed our objection and comments on the audit report and approved the report and upheld the appeal court's judgment.

I believe that the auditor's report is biased and is one sided. I think that you should file a criminal case against the auditor.if you want me to file the case, I will charge a

fee not less than Dh.50,000/- From: poojamans@hotmail.com

 

haris document

 

file-14-17-1-ext009

 

file-14-17-1-ext010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

addfile2001

Date: 4/8/98 Al Khaleej Advocates Dubai  Public Prosecution 

S C BANK’ SOUR MIGHT IS RIGHT AND OUR MONEY CANS BY ANY CITIZEN ANY WHERE IN UAE. IN UAE EVERY WHERE S C BANK’ MONEY POWER IS THERE WE CAN MANIPULATE THE CIVIL LAW INTO CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST YOU AND WE WILL PROVE THAT WE ARE ALWAYS RIGHT EVEN IF WE INDEED WRONG OTHERWISE


Reopened the record on Monday, 15/03/1999 m at exactly 12:30 pm at the Public Prosecution

Place: Investigation office – Registries    Time: 11:20

Date: 4/8/98  Name: Mohammad Abdullah Al Obaidally

Nationality: UAE  Sex: Male

Occupation : Lawyer

Age: 36 years old   Place of Birth: Abu Dhabi

Mothers Name Aziza

Residence Address: (Illigible) – Misherif  Tel: 050-6468616

Work Address: Al Khaleej Advocates – Maktoum Street, Ras Al Khaima Bldg.

Tel: 28808

I, Lieutenant Abdul Magid Fadil, have written the testimony of the abovementioned person who is the reporter of this incident, he testified as follows:

Korespan Lawrence issued a cheque for the benefit of our client Mansukhani Dayal Hassaram, Indian national. The bank that the cheque drawn from – Standard Chartered have stamped and guaranteed the value of the cheque – or the cheque was verified and can be on its due date, considering that the bank had taken all necessary procedures before certifying and guaranteeing the value of the cheque, for which reason the beneficiary (our client) accepted the cheque.

When our client submitted the cheque, the bank refused to fulfill the cheque and told our client to refer to the drawer.  This kind of procedure can only be done on normal cheques which are not certified or guaranteed.  Our client attempted so many times to collect the amount of the cheque but the bank refused without any right, and that is a crime that the law punishes for according the article 402 of the Federall Punishment Law No. 3 of 1987.

Stewart Hamond Nationality: British

According to the copy, we were sure that the cheque was forge and that was why we refused to fulfill the cheque.

 

Place: Investigation office  Time: 12:30    Date: 4/8/98

Name: Stewart Hamond

Nationality: British

Sex: Male

Occupation: Chief of Investigation –investigation

Age: 40 years    Place of Birth: Britain

Mothers Name: Watson

Residence Address: Al Wasl near the Iranian

Tel: 421692 

Work Address: Standard Chartered Bank

Tel: 5070670

 

I,  Lieutenant Abdul Magid Fadil, have written the testimony of the above mentioned person who is investigated in the fact of the returned cheque.  He is the representative of the defendant bank. He testified as follows:

Yes, it happened that Korespan Lorence of Besco International Company have issued a cheque No. 404977 drawn from our bank on 15/7/96, or that is due date was for more than two years. TRhe cheque was actuallu certified by the bank to be fulfilled on its due date, but the benefiaciary did not forward the cheque until 15/7/98.

 

It was clear that there was an alteration on the date of the year which was changed for the same year. We had a copy of the same cheque that we took from the owner f the account when we suspected the cherub to be forged.  According to the copy, we were sure that the cheque was forge and that was why we refused to fulfill the cheque.

 

They returned again on 22/7 after being visited by the bearer of the cheque the beneficiary – Mr. Dayal Mansukhani whereas he contacted the bank and the bank sent for receiving the matter and investigating the same, and told him the reason for not fulfilling the cheque. The amount is One Hundred thousand dirhams.  It was a forgery on the cheque.  Another cheque had been reviewed that is dated 15/10/98, it was also forged on the date of the year. The year was altered to 98 instead of 96, and the number of the cheque / 404976. He requested assistance on the matter, and I told him to write a letter to the bank and the bank would officially reply with the reasons for not fulfilling the cheque, but he submitted the cheque for the second time and it was again returned. He then wrote a letter to the bank that was received on 28/7/98 and we replied to him on the matter. As previously did and refused to cash the cheque.

 

On the same date, I met the lawyer of the drawer or Besco International and they owed the bank an amount more than one hundred thoudsand. There I found the ssame copy of the same cheques, that bear clearly the due year which is 1996. I took the copy from them. No, Irequested them to give me the copy f the cheque but they refused in the urgent meeting. And on 26/7/98, the said beneficiary sent us a copy of a letter written to the Cetral Bank, and did not add anything tothat when the cheque was submitted for the third time on 25/7/98.

 

The same cheque returned and on 2/8/98, I received a letter (copy) by fax from the lawyer of the beneficiary requesting fulfillment or cashing the cheque within three days, and did not add anything because the three days did not end yet – or still I have one day more to reply to them. On Sunday 30/8/98 I contacted the lawyer of he drawer (Besco International), they sent me three copies of the three cheques related to the subject in the name of the beneficiary and it was clear on the cheques in comparison with the furnished cheque that there is a forgery on the date.

 

I would like to add in my testimony that he book from which the cheques were taken (illegible) from the bank on 95 and one of the people who signed on the certification was Mr. Khorshid Anphala, who left the job on 96, and the second person was transferred to a branch of the bank in Qatar on 97 and the latter left our branch on April 96 after the certification, that clearly (illegible) that the alteration on the cheques was done on the certification after issuance of the cheques wa done on the certification after issuance of the cheques and that is a clear forgery for not having a signature on the alteration or on the erasure on the furnished cheque.

 

We are in the process of issuing a complaint to submit to the police- for the accusation of forgery and this is the letter of the bank for the complaint of this cheque, and I have explained to the beneficiary that if he wanted to make a complaint against anybody in this regard, we would be ready to forward the necessary assistance.  This is my testimony and on it I sign.

(Signed)

3http://www.mummedia.co/dayalp_files/image107.jpg

 

Bernard RajI & Public Prosecution 15.03.1999

 

The minutes of the Public Prosecution beset with: Director of Bisco named Bernard Raj

Reopened the record on Monday, 15.03.1999 M in the 12 noon at the Public Prosecution

Authority above

As today is the deadline for achieving the company with the Director of the World Bisco called Bernard RajI borrowed an amount of five hundred thousand dirhams from the accused Minsokany return, handed him three checks in that amount AED 100,000 and rolled Statendr Chartdr bank and the check is payable on 15.07.199--? AD has paid the full amount of the loan to the defendant at different times has not taken or recovered checks from the defendant on merit and after the due date are not entitled to claim its value has fulfilled it in all the debts after the due date requested by the accused Minsokany checks, but he told me he had Christnfez checks for the friendly and he is prepared to lend me any time I want a month ago Director called and learned that the accused had forged the due date in item Year

Note we have presented the check in question to a witness present

Q: Can we check the thermometer and you Bahrdah site by you?

A: I signed on the check Vtm The rest of the data printed by the bank in my presence and the bank manager and the employee concerned and signed on the back of the check to ensure the collection of value to the beneficiary on 07/15/199--?6 at maturity m

Q: Are you who you hand over a check for the invited Minsokany dayal  A: Yes,

 

 

Bernard RajI

Name: Lawrence Bernard Korisaban Nationality: Indian Age: 42 years Date: 12/02/99 two checks (200000404975or76 ?

Yes I handed over the check with no data asked them to edit the amount of (200000) AED for the benefit of the beneficiary and then guaranteed to pay for the purpose of enabling me to get a loan from the called / humus - the part of banking facilities but I told the bank I can not meet the value of the check that date and requested an extension and was before the days of the date of Due the above-mentioned and already asked me to bring the check to them, where the Bank has changed the due date I signed the amendment reported at the front of the check as adopted by the Bank once again from behind and with respect to the change that I see now the most stylish of any in the box months, I do not think one may be caused by other than the beneficiary of any humus because the check has stayed with him until now and I would like to add that there are two checks others were Aatmahma to push the coffee one amount (200000) AED As to how any change to obliterate the ancient history and print the new date does not mention that he had been to check one or all of history, as is evident by check subject of this complaint and this can advise me on the validity of the overall sign.

 

 

 

 

 

10

CHEQUE 404977  

 

CHEQUE404976  

7

 

3http://www.mummedia.co/dayalp_files/image107.jpg

 

 

CHEQUE404975?

 

 

CHEQUE404976  

7

CHEQUE 404977  

10

 

 

Original cheque with legal alteration above – has no value but seen below the photocopy has been given value by the Dubai Public Prosecutor and Dubai Court. This proves influence can buy anyone and everything. SCB buy Dubai Law. Indian, Dubai residents have no value.

Standard Chartered bank filed a case on me based on behalf of the photo copy of a cheque and Dubai police filed case on evidence of this photo copy.

 

http://www.needjustice.net/index_files/image023.jpg  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.needjustice.net/index_files/image025.jpg

 

 

file1-to-5004

 

 

 

 

 

 

file1-to-5016

 

 

 

 

file1-to-5005

 

file1-to-5003

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This letter from bank confirms that my Juma trading which was 20 years old business was closed in 1998, due to my passport being blocked from 17th oct. 1999 to 25th april 2000 and filed against me 2 cases and my local partner was afraid of all this so stopped business with me. Even Raj filed against me false civil case 557/98 for more than dhs 1,000,000/.

 

uk complaint number 5723 T

 

 

file1-to-5010

 

 

file3001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Chartered Bank  

Group Investigations          

P. O. Box: 999            

Dubai    

United Arab Emirates  

Tel : +971(4)507 0670        

Fax: +971(4)521 827       

05.08.1998  

Al Rafa Police Station      

Complainant: Standard Chartered Bank   

Complainee: Dayal Mansukhani               

Residing at apartment No. 302, Al Mansour Building, near Ramada Hotel, Bur Dubai.

Report under Articles 216 – 34/399 of the punishment law of 1987.

Director, Al Rafa Police Station      

Please permit us to furnish the following:         

1-The above complainant is a bank established in England and licensed to operate in Dubai (the Bank).

2-                      The complainee is an Indian national, residing at the above-mentioned address.

3-                      The bank has previously approved the cheque No. 404976, drawn to the account of Besco International at the bank, for the benefit of the above-mentioned complainee for an amount of Dirhams One Hundred Thousand (200,000) provided that the same is presented on a specified date, which is 15.06.1996. (Copy attached)

4-                       On 15.10.1998, the complainee presented the cheque to the bank and requested the value of the same. Upon perusal, it appeared that there is a clear alteration on the due date specified on the cheque. Therefore, the bank refused to pay the value of the cheque (Original attached).

 

 

5-                      In addition to the above-mentioned, the issuer of the cheque, Besco International, did not have a credit balance on the date when the cheque was presented, but was indebted to the bank for an amount that exceeds the value of the cheque.

 

7-                      One of the persons, who signed the approval of the cheqe on behalf of the complainant bank, left the service at the bank since 1996, and the other one left the said branch since 1996 and has been transferred to the branch of the bank in Qatar since April 1997. The book from which the cheques were drawn has been given in 1995.

8-                      The complainant bank sees that the act of the complainee in seeking taking over the bank’s money in the said manner is considered a violation to Articles 216 and 399 read with Article 34 of the punishment law.

Therefore, the matter requires taking the necessary procedures in pursuing the complainee and anyone proved to be involved in approving such fraud manner.

Thanks and regards.     

Stewart Hamond                                 

(Signed)                      

for / Standard Chartered Bank

cancelled.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

files12004

 

Note: the first 3 cheques are guarantied by standard charted bank guaranty cheques. The numbers are 404975 and 404976 and 404977.

I had not received the first cheque with number 404975 and so I had replied him that I did not receive this cheque.

SCB bank issued on 5th August 1998 a letter to the Dubai Police, to hide its own crime. In this

letter there are so many evidences which prove crimes committed by the SCB.

Besco International – Raj Bernard got 3 blank cheques photocopies and told that he would like to take a loan against bank guarantee - chq no 404975 and 404976 and 404977. On viewing these

documents – issued by SCB I gave him the loan. SCB issued PDC for Besco Intl. in my favor and certified it in my favor.

Raj came to my home and told me that his business partner (local) is from a sheik family and he had a big amount in the standard charted bank. For this reason standard charted bank has given me the guaranty.

Me a personal loan of amount 500,000 and tat he would provide a certified bank guaranty cheque. He brought photo copies of 3 cheques with out date in my favor. I had seen the bank guaranty and gave him 300,000 during the period November / December 1997. after words he gave me original cheques due on 1998.

Note: the first sample onDate cheques are guarantied by standard charted bank guaranty cheques. The numbers are 404975 and 404976 and 404977. I had not received the first cheque with number 404975 and so I had replied him that I did not receive this cheque.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Raj Bernard 1995 – 1997 December 4 Agreements.

 

1)      Agreement No. 1 – Mr. Thomas Gauarantee PDC Cheques Raj

2)      Agreement No.2 & 3 – Dubai Drydock Letter PDC Cheques Raj Installments

3)      Agreement No. 4 – Standard Chartered Bank issued Certified Cheques 15/07/1998 & 15/10/1998 = AED100,000 + 200,000 = AED300,000

Mr. KL Bernard Raj, Besco International LLC as Manager & Mr. Dayal Masakhuni, starts business together on November 1995. Some financial assistance has been issued to Mr. KL Bernard Raj thru PDC’s Cheques without Agreement signed by both parties, only the copy of cheques as an evidence amounting to AED600,000/-

 

After 1 – 2 & more long-term years of  business together, they entered 2 Agreements dated 23/17/1996 & Renewal Agreement 20/12/1997. For this 2 years, business going smoothly and after 27/02/1998, BESCO Int’l changed to BESCO LLC company.

 

Above AED 1 Million due from Mr. Dayal payments, Besco LLC not do a proper follow-up and stopped  on 07/02/1998 M/S Dubai DryDocks payments and legal issues starts.

 

Between AED3 Million to 4Million Turn-Over, too many issued Cheques passed & returned cheques but BESCO LLC Letter dated 20/01/1998, Mr. Dayal Masakhuni, Total Balance Amount AED 1,408,124/-

 

 

 

files12006

 

 

files12007

File12 The below is the agreement made by Raj with me with respect to the PDC cheques on 20th December  1997.

 

files12005

 

 

 

 

 

The below mentioned agreement proves that BESCO was supplying man power to dubai drydock. And BESCO gets the payment after 60 days. Since the labor should be paid every one month , Mr Raj took cash from me and gave me PDC cheques  and said that Dubai Dry docks would transfer the money in to my account every month and I was deducting my installment amount and was paying the remaining amount. All the details  of the cheques and cash that I had given to him are mentioned below.

These are the 12 PDC cheques  with were bounced and so I had filed a criminal case against Raj.

 

file12-add001

files12011

 

 

files12008

 

 

The translation of the above letter in Arabic language.

file12-add004

 

 

 

 

 

This letter proves that Raj had given me PDC cheques worth more than 900,000 and stopped the payment from the next month. Instead of receiving 900,000 I received 38,800 from Dubai drydocks.

files12009

 

 

Arabic translation of the above mentioned letter.

 

1

 

firm Dayal H Mansukhani to Besco 27/11/1995 to 20/12/1997.

 

 

FILE10  cheque no 1, amount  400,000 cash received from Raj.

Cheque No.

Date

Amount AED

Bank and Branch

Favouring/ Recipient

115877

27.11.1995

400,000

Commonwealth Bank International, plc, Main Branch, Dubai

Bernard Raj KL

500004

09.12.1995

100,000

Mashreq Bank,  Khor,  Dubai

Bernard Raj KL

115880

16.12.1995

100,000

Commonwealth Bank International, plc, Main Branch, Dubai

Dayal (Cash paid through Bernard Raj KL)

115916

22.05.1996

200,000

Mashreq Bank,  Khor, Dubai

Self (Cash paid through Bernard Raj KL)

000259

23.07.1996

3,64,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

KL Bernard Raj

-

23.07.1996

4,00,000

Cash Paid

Cash paid as per Agreement

000507

09.09.1996

98,360

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Hari Kumar

000342

05.11.1996

100,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Hari Kumar

000395

10.03.1997

160,345

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Cash (Countersigned by Hari Kumar)

000496

26.05.1997

205,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Leslie

-

27.06.1997

90,000

Cash

Cash paid to Raj (No Proof)

000539

19.07.1997

300,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Cash (Paying in Slip confirms credit in Besco Account No. 5490663421 Mashreq Bank)

000545

23.07.1997

2,04,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Leslie Nunez (Countersigned by Leslie)

000852

10.08.1997

149,519

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Leslie Nunez (Countersigned by Leslie)

000561

24.08.1997

190,000

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Leslie Nunez (Countersigned)

000828

20.12.1997

9,986

Mashreq Bank, Khor, Dubai

Harikumar S (Countersigned)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

file-10-13001

cheque no2 100,000 cheque received from raj.

file-10-13002

 

 

I had with drawn cash from the bank and delivered to Raj on 16-12-95 100,000 and 200,000 on 25-5-96.

file-10-13003

 

 

on 20-7-96 I had given him 36,000 cash.

I had given a PDC cheque on 23-7-96 for 364,000 to Raj.

file-10-13004

 

I gave amount 98,364 in  cash to Hari Kumar on 9-9-96. Hari Kumar is Besco accountant.

file-10-13005

 

 

on 5-11-96 I gave hari kumar 100,000 cheque.

cheque amount 160,345 was received by Hari Kumar on 10-3-97  and  35,000 cash on 22-4-97 to Raj.

file-10-13007

FILE11  Amount 205,000 cheque  received by Leslie ( BESCO STAFF) on 26-5-97

file11001

on 26-5-97 226,000 cash was received by Raj.

On 20-7-96 36,000 cash was received by Raj from Dayal.

Raj requested me a loan of 300,000 for the purpose of guaranty towards LLC license. He had promised me to return the money in one month. He also promised me to make me as an investing partner. This company is 100%  owned by Almullah  and so he cannot make be as an investor partner legally. So I gave him 300,000 cheque.

 

 

file11002

 

Leslie ( BESCO staff) received  204,000 on 23-7-97.

file11003

 

on 27-6-97 Raj received 90,000 cash from Dayal Leslie received cheque for amount  dh 149519 dated 11-8-97.

file11004

 

 

Raj received 10,000 cash on 20-08-97.  And Leslie received 190,000 cheque on 24-8-97.

file11005

 

Hari received amount 9986 on 20-12-97.

 

file11006

the below are the details of the money transferred by Dubai Drydock into my account in English

files689018

 

 

the below are the details of the money transferred by Dubai Drydock into my account in Arabic.

files689026

 

 

 

 

ajmantransfercriminalcase dubai

 

rajchequebounce

 

557-98 case documant

 

903-98 PP cancel case

 

PP 903-98 cancel case

 

 

File 13.  CASE 157/ 2000 Khaleej time appeal  457/2002

.file-10-13010

This file will prove that before 1998, I had no crime against me. After 2nd August 1998, I registered complaint against SCB and all the wrong cases were filed against me and my entire family was tortured by threatening calls. SCB issued 2 bank guarantee checks – while bank officer confirmed that our bank never certifies checks in this way, which means bank’s crime confirmed and crime was supported by Dubai Public Prosecutor. The complaint which I had filed against SCB was cancelled and instead criminal case was filed on me 1246/99. And in the second check even after legal alteration proved, I did not get payment till today. And during the case period my passport was blocked and also we all brothers received strange calls and were pressured. In 1998 and 1999 I suffered 2 heart attacks and was admitted in Rashid hospital.

29th Jan. 1999 my brother received such calls, and was nervous and expired in afternoon.

 

When paper was started from 28th jan. 99, then why was the claim rejected? Is the alteration on payment received place – alteration is at witness place and when paper was starting – can be witness signed a day later. Here also –crime is supported.

Case No. 157/2000 Khaleej Times – recd. Payment on 27th January 99 – and started paper from28th Jan. 99 – insurance covered by Alliance Ins. From 28th Jan., 99, paper started on the same day. The subscriber expired on 29/1/98, afternoon. Khaleej Times – did not pay the claim and Dubai Court – rejected the claim. Why? NOTE: newspaper boy also is from Kerala. I doubt the boy has given witness under pressure from Raj.

 

 

file-10-13009

 

this is good that I have this proof – by Dubai Government that his death was on 29th January 1999. (if it would had been of some other country then they could say it is fake certificate)

 

 

 

 

file-10-13008

Khaleej Times received payment on 27th January 1999, receipt of payment voucher. (above)

Below – Alliance Insurance policy confirms insurance date – starts from 28/1/99 to 27/1/00. ( no alteration in both these dates)

 

 

 

My other brother also expired when visited Mumbai – at night he slept and other

day did not wake up- he was all alone there – and he received some SCB strange call and was not alive anymore..file-10-13011

 

 

Why did the Dubai Court and appeal court reject the claims?

. On 8th july 1999, I was admitted to Dubai Hospital for Heart Balloon Surgery. On 9th I receive a phone call that if I don’t take back the appeal against SCB and If I don’t agree to the crime then the other day i.e 10th while on operation bed – I shall be killed and would be gone to where my brothers were. (dead) I trust God and so I was not afraid with these threats.

 

The below document proves that Dubai hospital cancelled my operation on 10th july 1999 before 5 mins. On 9th july I had received a phone call and they have threatened me that there could be an accident in the operation theatre. But the doctor DR.Redhwan cancelled my operation on some reasons. This proves that some one was pressing the doctor, but the doctor being a good man saved my life by canceling the operation.

 

file-10-13014

file-10-13015

 

 

This statement proves that my operation is cancelled on 10th july 1999. In this manner they have pressurizeda heart patient by phone calls.

file-10-13024

 

 

1st July 1999, hospital called me and asked me to get admitted on 8th july 1999– and that the stent was available. Accordingly I was admitted in Dubai Hospital on 8th july 1999. On 9th july 1999 I received a call that I should take back all the cases against Raj Bernard and SCB and if I don’t do so then maybe during operation an accident can occur and I will be declared dead. When my arteries were blocked as you can read – all the 3 – one 100%, one 90% and one 65% and if someone in this state receives a call in this way – then you can understand what can happen – he can die on the spot. And the next day really it happened – my operation was cancelled – Dr Redhwan cancelled the operation. This proves that so big hospital was also under the SCB and Raj, they had powers and Dr Redhwan was good as he could not kill me but cancelled the operation. This is how Dubai resident is looked after.

 

 

file-10-13016

 

file-10-13017

 

 

file11014

 

 

 

 

 

file11015

 

 

file11016

file11017

 

 

 

file11018

 

 

 

 

 

file11019

 

 

file11020

 

file11021

This file is proof  that BESCO is 100% local ALMULLAH. The passport copy is attached. Almullah had given the power of attorney to Raj Bharnal. I am attaching the trade licence photo copy from 1995- 1997 july . Almullah is the owner and Raj is the manager.

Also I am attaching , a copy of the application for LLC licence of Mr.Raj . Raj took loan from me on the 20th July 1997 for an amount of 300 ,000 Dirams. This proves that there is no local capital involved in the LLC. Also there is no Raj’s capital.

 

5

 

please check Raj’s visa. He has a work visa. Not a business visa.

 

6

 

Almulla gave power of attorney to Raj. Almullah’s signature is below.

Almullah is working as a Dubai labour officer with a high designation.  He can approve as many labor visas as he want. He owns a man power recruitment company and supplies to different companies. Raj took loan for this company and he issued PDC cheques of this company. All of them were bounced, so Almullah is responsible.

 

7

 

 

This is the certificate of license issued by UAE government that BESCO is 100% local company , owner is Almullah and he gave him power of attorney to Raj. So if any cheque is bounced then Almullah is responsible for it.

file12-add002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

file1-to-5016

 

 

 

uk complaint number 5723 T

file-14-17-1-ext011

Original cheque with legal alteration above – has no value but seen below the photocopy has been given value by the Dubai Public Prosecutor and Dubai Court. This proves influence can buy anyone and everything. SCB buy Dubai Law. Indian, Dubai residents have no value.

Standard Chartered bank filed a case on me based on behalf of the photo copy of a cheque and Dubai police filed case on evidence of this photo copy. (Seventh Crime)

 

 

 

file1-to-5004

 

file1-to-5016

 

 

file1-to-5005

 

file1-to-5003

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This letter from bank confirms that my Juma trading which was 20 years old business was closed in 1998, due to my passport being blocked from 17th oct. 1999 to 25th april 2000 and filed against me 2 cases and my local partner was afraid of all this so stopped business with me. Even Raj filed against me false civil case 557/98 for more than dhs 1,000,000/.

 

uk complaint number 5723 T

file1-to-5010

 

file3001

 

 

 

 

 

 

File8: Arabic translation for SCB bank. Private criminal lab report.

The name of the expert is Mr.Ahmed obaid Al-Bah, Arab Lab for Technical Inspection, PO Box 27790, Dubai , Tel 2698244/ Fax 2698344/ Email : arablab@emirates.net.ae

File 7 The name of the expert is Mr.Ahmed obaid Al-Bah, Arab Lab for Technical Inspection, PO Box 27790, Dubai , Tel 2698244/ Fax 2698344/ Email : arablab@emirates.net.ae

 

 

files12005

file1-to-5002

 

 

haris document

 

file-14-17-1-ext009file-14-17-1-ext010

 

 

 

File 13.  CASE 157/ 2000 Khaleej time appeal  457/2002

 

.file-10-13010

This file will prove that before 1998, I had no crime against me. After 2nd August 1998, I registered complaint against SCB and all the wrong cases were filed against me and my entire family was tortured by threatening calls. SCB issued 2 bank guarantee checks – while bank officer confirmed that our bank never certifies checks in this way, which means bank’s crime confirmed and crime was supported by Dubai Public Prosecutor. The complaint which I had filed against SCB was cancelled and instead criminal case was filed on me 1246/99. And in the second check even after legal alteration proved, I did not get payment till today. And during the case period my passport was blocked and also we all brothers received strange calls and were pressured. In 1998 and 1999 I suffered 2 heart attacks and was admitted in Rashid hospital.

29th Jan. 1999 my brother received such calls, and was nervous and expired in afternoon.

 

When paper was started from 28th jan. 99, then why was the claim rejected? Is the alteration on payment received place – alteration is at witness place and when paper was starting – can be witness signed a day later. Here also –crime is supported.

Case No. 157/2000 Khaleej Times – recd. Payment on 27th January 99 – and started paper from28th Jan. 99 – insurance covered by Alliance Ins. From 28th Jan., 99, paper started on the same day. The subscriber expired on 29/1/98, afternoon. Khaleej Times – did not pay the claim and Dubai Court – rejected the claim. Why? NOTE: newspaper boy also is from Kerala. I doubt the boy has given witness under pressure from Raj.

 

 

file-10-13009

 

this is good that I have this proof – by Dubai Government that his death was on 29th January 1999. (if it would had been of some other country then they could say it is fake certificate)

 

 

 

 

file-10-13008

Khaleej Times received payment on 27th January 1999, receipt of payment voucher. (above)

Below – Alliance Insurance policy confirms insurance date – starts from 28/1/99 to 27/1/00. ( no alteration in both these dates)

 

 

 

My other brother also expired when visited Mumbai – at night he slept and other

day did not wake up- he was all alone there – and he received some SCB strange call and was not alive anymore..file-10-13011

 

 

Why did the Dubai Court and appeal court reject the claims?

. On 8th july 1999, I was admitted to Dubai Hospital for Heart Balloon Surgery. On 9th I receive a phone call that if I don’t take back the appeal against SCB and If I don’t agree to the crime then the other day i.e 10th while on operation bed – I shall be killed and would be gone to where my brothers were. (dead) I trust God and so I was not afraid with these threats.

 

The below document proves that Dubai hospital cancelled my operation on 10th july 1999 before 5 mins. On 9th july I had received a phone call and they have threatened me that there could be an accident in the operation theatre. But the doctor DR.Redhwan cancelled my operation on some reasons. This proves that some one was pressing the doctor, but the doctor being a good man saved my life by canceling the operation.

 

file-10-13014

file-10-13015

 

 

This statement proves that my operation is cancelled on 10th july 1999. In this manner they have pressurizeda heart patient by phone calls.

file-10-13024

 

 

1st July 1999, hospital called me and asked me to get admitted on 8th july 1999– and that the stent was available. Accordingly I was admitted in Dubai Hospital on 8th july 1999. On 9th july 1999 I received a call that I should take back all the cases against Raj Bernard and SCB and if I don’t do so then maybe during operation an accident can occur and I will be declared dead. When my arteries were blocked as you can read – all the 3 – one 100%, one 90% and one 65% and if someone in this state receives a call in this way – then you can understand what can happen – he can die on the spot. And the next day really it happened – my operation was cancelled – Dr Redhwan cancelled the operation. This proves that so big hospital was also under the SCB and Raj, they had powers and Dr Redhwan was good as he could not kill me but cancelled the operation. This is how Dubai resident is looked after.

 

 

file-10-13016

 

file-10-13017

 

 

file11014

 

please check Raj’s visa. He has a work visa. Not a business visa.

 

6

 

Almulla gave power of attorney to Raj. Almullah’s signature is below.

Almullah is working as a Dubai labour officer with a high designation.  He can approve as many labor visas as he want. He owns a man power recruitment company and supplies to different companies. Raj took loan for this company and he issued PDC cheques of this company. All of them were bounced, so Almullah is responsible.

 

7

 

 

This is the certificate of license issued by UAE government that BESCO is 100% local company , owner is Almullah and he gave him power of attorney to Raj. So if any cheque is bounced then Almullah is responsible for it.

file12-add002